Efficacy of naproxen in patients with sciatica: multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

被引:3
|
作者
Grovle, Lars [1 ]
Hasvik, Eivind [2 ]
Holst, Rene [3 ,4 ]
Saetre, Anders [5 ]
Brox, Jens Ivar [6 ,7 ]
Mathiassen, Stale [8 ]
Myhre, Kjersti [6 ]
Holmgard, Thor Einar [9 ]
Haugen, Anne Julsrud [1 ]
机构
[1] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Rheumatol, Gralum, Norway
[2] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Gralum, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Res, Gralum, Norway
[5] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Skien, Norway
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[8] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Stavanger, Norway
[9] Norwegian Back Pain Assoc, Drammen, Norway
关键词
Sciatica; Radiculopathy; Intervertebral disc displacement; NSAIDs; Randomized controlled trial; Rescue medication; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RISK-FACTORS; PREVALENCE; OUTCOMES; DISK;
D O I
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003280
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.Ten days of naproxen treatment, a traditional nonselective NSAID, did not yield clinically important efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe sciatica. This trial assessed the efficacy of naproxen in patients with sciatica in outpatient clinics across 4 Norwegian hospitals. A total of 123 adults with radiating pain below the knee (>= 4 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale) and signs consistent with nerve root involvement were included. Participants were randomized to receive either naproxen 500 mg or a placebo twice daily for 10 days. The primary outcome, daily leg pain intensity measured on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale throughout the treatment period, revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of naproxen, with an adjusted mean difference of -0.5 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.1, P = 0.015). In the naproxen group, the treatment effect was significantly related to time, and over the whole 10-day period, the average adjusted difference was -0.6 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.5). Mean numbers needed to treat for 30% and 50% improvement were 9.9 (95% CI 4.7-15.0) and 20.7 (8.7-32.7), respectively. The adjusted mean difference for back pain was -0.4 (95% CI -0.8 to 0.0), and for Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica, it was -1.5 (95% CI -3.0 to 0.0). No differences were found for sciatica bothersomeness or consumption of rescue medication or opioids. Participants in the naproxen group exhibited an adjusted odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI 1.3-16.2) for improvement by 1 level on the global perceived change scale. In conclusion, naproxen treatment showed small, likely clinically unimportant benefits compared with placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe sciatica.
引用
收藏
页码:2606 / 2614
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anakinra in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    de Boysson, Hubert
    Ly, Kim
    Geffray, Loik
    Quemeneur, Thomas
    Liozon, Eric
    Bezanahary, Holy
    Le Gouellec, Noemie
    Audemard, Alexandra
    Deshayes, Samuel
    Boutemy, Jonathan
    Maigne, Gwenola
    Silva, Nicolas Martin
    Parienti, Jean-Jacques
    Aouba, Achille
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 76 : 3467 - 3469
  • [32] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of valproate for agitation associated with dementia
    Tariot, PN
    Thal, L
    Jakimovich, L
    Thomas, R
    Raman, R
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2004, 25 : S189 - S189
  • [33] Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial
    Fleischer, David M.
    Burks, A. Wesley
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Wood, Robert A.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Sicherer, Scott H.
    Liu, Andrew H.
    Stablein, Donald
    Henning, Alice K.
    Mayer, Lloyd
    Lindblad, Robert
    Plaut, Marshall
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 131 (01) : 119 - U184
  • [34] Multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled glucosamine discontinuation trial in osteoarthritis.
    Cibere, J
    Esdaile, JM
    Thorne, A
    Singer, J
    Kopec, JA
    Canvin, J
    Robinson, DB
    Pope, J
    Hong, P
    Grant, E
    Ionescu, M
    Poole, AR
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (09): : S576 - S577
  • [35] Meniett Device in Meniere Disease: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Trial
    Russo, Francesca Yoshie
    Yann Nguyen
    De Seta, Daniele
    Bouccara, Didier
    Sterkers, Olivier
    Ferrary, Evelyne
    Bernardeschi, Daniele
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (02): : 470 - 475
  • [36] Distal Ureteric Stones and Tamsulosin: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Trial
    Furyk, Jeremy S.
    Chu, Kevin
    Banks, Colin
    Greenslade, Jaimi
    Keijzers, Gerben
    Thom, Ogilvie
    Torpie, Tom
    Dux, Carl
    Narula, Rajan
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 67 (01) : 86 - 95
  • [37] Applicability of Press Needles to a Double-blind Trial A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Miyazaki, Shougo
    Hagihara, Akihito
    Kanda, Ryo
    Mukaino, Yoshito
    Nobutomo, Koichi
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 25 (05): : 438 - 444
  • [38] Budesonide treatment for collagenous colitis:: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial
    Miehlke, S
    Heymer, P
    Bethke, B
    Bästlein, E
    Meier, E
    Bartram, HP
    Wilhelms, G
    Lehn, N
    Dorta, G
    Delarive, J
    Tromm, A
    Bayerdörffer, E
    Stolte, M
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 123 (04) : 978 - 984
  • [39] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of influenza immunization in multiple sclerosis
    Miller, AE
    Morgante, LA
    Buchwald, LY
    Coyle, PK
    Krupp, LB
    Doscher, CA
    Lublin, FD
    Knobler, RL
    Trantas, F
    Kelley, L
    Smith, CR
    LaRocca, N
    Lopez, S
    NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (02) : 312 - 314
  • [40] Effects of Omeprazole on Sleep Disturbance: Randomized Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Aimi, Masahito
    Komazawa, Yoshinori
    Hamamoto, Naoharu
    Yamane, Yuko
    Furuta, Koichiro
    Uchida, Yasushi
    Yano, Shozo
    Ota, Miwa
    Oguro, Hiroaki
    Miyake, Tatsuya
    Sugimoto, Toshitsugu
    Naora, Kohji
    Nagi, Seiichi
    Ishihara, Shunji
    Goubaru, Yoshiyuki
    Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S739 - S739