Efficacy of naproxen in patients with sciatica: multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

被引:3
|
作者
Grovle, Lars [1 ]
Hasvik, Eivind [2 ]
Holst, Rene [3 ,4 ]
Saetre, Anders [5 ]
Brox, Jens Ivar [6 ,7 ]
Mathiassen, Stale [8 ]
Myhre, Kjersti [6 ]
Holmgard, Thor Einar [9 ]
Haugen, Anne Julsrud [1 ]
机构
[1] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Rheumatol, Gralum, Norway
[2] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Gralum, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Res, Gralum, Norway
[5] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Skien, Norway
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[8] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Stavanger, Norway
[9] Norwegian Back Pain Assoc, Drammen, Norway
关键词
Sciatica; Radiculopathy; Intervertebral disc displacement; NSAIDs; Randomized controlled trial; Rescue medication; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RISK-FACTORS; PREVALENCE; OUTCOMES; DISK;
D O I
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003280
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.Ten days of naproxen treatment, a traditional nonselective NSAID, did not yield clinically important efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe sciatica. This trial assessed the efficacy of naproxen in patients with sciatica in outpatient clinics across 4 Norwegian hospitals. A total of 123 adults with radiating pain below the knee (>= 4 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale) and signs consistent with nerve root involvement were included. Participants were randomized to receive either naproxen 500 mg or a placebo twice daily for 10 days. The primary outcome, daily leg pain intensity measured on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale throughout the treatment period, revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of naproxen, with an adjusted mean difference of -0.5 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.1, P = 0.015). In the naproxen group, the treatment effect was significantly related to time, and over the whole 10-day period, the average adjusted difference was -0.6 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.5). Mean numbers needed to treat for 30% and 50% improvement were 9.9 (95% CI 4.7-15.0) and 20.7 (8.7-32.7), respectively. The adjusted mean difference for back pain was -0.4 (95% CI -0.8 to 0.0), and for Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica, it was -1.5 (95% CI -3.0 to 0.0). No differences were found for sciatica bothersomeness or consumption of rescue medication or opioids. Participants in the naproxen group exhibited an adjusted odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI 1.3-16.2) for improvement by 1 level on the global perceived change scale. In conclusion, naproxen treatment showed small, likely clinically unimportant benefits compared with placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe sciatica.
引用
收藏
页码:2606 / 2614
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adalimumab in Severe and Acute Sciatica A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Genevay, Stephane
    Viatte, Sebastien
    Finckh, Axel
    Zufferey, Pascal
    Balague, Federico
    Gabay, Cem
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2010, 62 (08): : 2339 - 2346
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of Toutongning Capsule in Patients with Migraine: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Yu, Shengyuan
    Ran, Ye
    Wan, Qi
    Yang, Xiaosu
    Chen, Huisheng
    Wang, Hebo
    Hu, Xueqiang
    Mao, Shanping
    Yu, Tingming
    Luo, Guogang
    Guan, Yangtai
    Gao, Xuguang
    Li, Xin
    Zhou, Muke
    Li, Yu
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (12) : 1215 - 1224
  • [3] Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Sciatica Pain: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Das, Siddharth Kumar
    Basu, Trishita
    Tabassum, Saleema Naaz
    Sarkar, Ashish
    Ghosh, Shubhamoy
    Koley, Munmun
    Saha, Subhranil
    Nath, Arunava
    Khamrui, Srimanta
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2024, 30 (07): : 671 - 681
  • [4] Pentoxifylline in ALS: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial
    Levin, B
    Thompson, JLP
    Levy, G
    Mitsumoto, H
    Kaufmann, P
    NEUROLOGY, 2006, 66 (11) : 1786 - 1786
  • [5] Pentoxifylline in ALS - A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial
    Meininger, V
    Asselain, B
    Guillet, P
    Leigh, PN
    Ludolph, A
    Lacomblez, L
    Robberecht, W
    NEUROLOGY, 2006, 66 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [6] DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF NAPROXEN FOR THE TREATMENT OF DYSMENORRHEA
    DAWOOD, MY
    RIMANDORAMOS, J
    SPANN, J
    NILAND, N
    HALLADAY, S
    FRANCISCO, C
    SKARE, K
    BARTIZEK, R
    SORRENTINO, J
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 57 (02) : 166 - 166
  • [7] Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial comparing the safety and efficacy of rufinamide
    Biton, V
    Rosenfeld, W
    Schachter, S
    Perdomo, C
    Arroyo, S
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2005, 58 : S114 - S114
  • [8] Efficacy of Prednisolone for Bell Palsy in Children A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial
    Babl, Franz E.
    Herd, David
    Borland, Meredith L.
    Kochar, Amit
    Lawton, Ben
    Hort, Jason
    West, Adam
    George, Shane
    Zhang, Michael
    Velusamy, Karthik
    Sullivan, Frank
    Oakley, Ed
    Davidson, Andrew
    Hopper, Sandy M.
    Cheek, John A.
    Berkowitz, Robert G.
    Hearps, Stephen
    Wilson, Catherine L.
    Williams, Amanda
    Elborough, Hannah
    Legge, Donna
    Mackay, Mark T.
    Lee, Katherine J.
    Dalziel, Stuart R.
    NEUROLOGY, 2022, 99 (20) : E2241 - E2252
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis - Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    van der Heijde, Desiree
    Kivitz, Alan
    Schiff, Michael H.
    Sieper, Joachim
    Dijkmans, Ben A. C.
    Braun, Juergen
    Dougados, Maxime
    Reveille, John D.
    Wong, Robert L.
    Kupper, Hartmut
    Davis, John C., Jr.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (07): : 2136 - 2146
  • [10] Gabapentin in the treatment of fibromyalgia - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial
    Arnold, Lesley M.
    Goldenberg, Don L.
    Stanford, Sharon B.
    Lalonde, Justine K.
    Sandhu, H. S.
    Keck, Paul E., Jr.
    Welge, Jeffrey A.
    Bishop, Fred
    Stanford, Kevin E.
    Hess, Evelyn V.
    Hudson, James I.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2007, 56 (04): : 1336 - 1344