Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Central Sensitization Inventory in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain

被引:0
|
作者
Tamboosi, Sarah E. [1 ]
Alzahrani, Hosam [2 ]
Alshehri, Fahad H. [2 ]
Alzhrani, Msaad [3 ]
Alshehri, Yasir S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Al khorma Gen Hosp, Dept Phys Therapy, Taif, Saudi Arabia
[2] Taif Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Taif, Saudi Arabia
[3] Majmaah Univ, Dept Phys Therapy & Hlth Rehabil, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia
[4] Taibah Univ, Coll Med Rehabil Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
来源
PEERJ | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
Central Sensitization Inventory; CSI; CSI-Ar; Pain; Cross-cultural adaptation; Psychometric validation; HEALTH-STATUS; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; VALIDATION; HYPERSENSITIVITY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; GUIDELINES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.18251
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is a patient-reported screening instrument that can be used to identify and assess central sensitization (CS)/Central Sensitization Syndrome (CSS)-related symptoms. Objective: The aim was to translate the CSI into Arabic (CSI-Ar) and to subsequently validate its psychometric properties. Design: Cross-sectional. Methods: The CSI was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Arabic, and validated following international standardized guidelines. This study included patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (n = 264) and healthy control participants (n = 56). Patients completed the CSI-Ar, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Depression, Anxiety, and Stress scale (DASS-21), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and 5-level EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Patients completed the CSI-Ar twice to assess test-retest - retest reliability. To evaluate discriminative validity, healthy controls participants completed the CSI-Ar. Statistical analyses were conducted to test the internal consistency, reliability, and structural, construct and discriminant validity of CSI-Ar. Results: The CSI-Ar showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's ' s alpha = 0.919) and excellent test-retest - retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient fi cient = 0.874). The CSI-Ar scale had significant fi cant correlations (P < 0.001) with all PCS subscales and total score (Spearman's ' s rho = 0.459-0.563, - 0.563, P < 0.001), all DASS-21 subscales and total score (Spearman's ' s rho = 0.599-0.685, - 0.685, P < 0.001), the TSK (Spearman's ' s rho = 0.395, P < 0.001), and the EQ-5D (Spearman's ' s rho = - 0.396, P < 0.001). The Mann-Whitney U-test showed a statistically significant fi cant difference between the patient group and the healthy control group (P < 0.001), with the healthy controls displaying a lower average CSI-Ar score (12.27 +/- 11.50) when compared to the patient group (27.97 +/- 16.08). Factor analysis indicated that the CSI-Ar is a unidimensional tool. Conclusion: The CSI-Ar is a reliable and valid screening tool that can be used to assess CS/CSS-related symptoms in Arabic-speaking people with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Psychometric validation of the Polish version of the Central Sensitization Inventory in subjects with chronic spinal pain
    Kosinska, Barbara
    Tarnacka, Beata
    Turczyn, Pawel
    Gromadzka, Grazyna
    Malec-Milewska, Malgorzata
    Janikowska-Holowenko, Dorota
    Neblett, Randy
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [42] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Cancer Behavior Inventory-Brief Version
    Iyigun, Emine
    Tastan, Sevinc
    Gezginci, Elif
    Korkmaz, Serap
    Demiral, Selcuk
    Beyzadeoglu, Murat
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2017, 54 (06) : 929 - 935
  • [43] Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and psychometric evaluation of the attitudes to back pain scale in musculoskeletal practitioners-Hebrew version
    Nudelman, Yaniv
    Pincus, Tamar
    Shashua, Anat
    Ben Ami, Noa
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 56
  • [44] The Portuguese version of the Epilepsy Surgery Inventory (ESI-55): Cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of psychometric properties
    Alonso, Neide Barreira
    Ciconelli, Rozana Mesquita
    da Silva, Tatiana Indelicato
    Westphal-Guitti, Ana Carolina
    Azevedo, Auro Mauro
    da Silva Noffs, Maria Helena
    Sales Ferreira Caboclo, Luis Otavio
    Sakamoto, Americo Ceiki
    Targas Yacubian, Elza Marcia
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 9 (01) : 126 - 132
  • [45] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Central Sensitization Inventory Among Chinese Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
    Tang, Rui
    Wan, Dongping
    Leng, Chuan
    Fan, Xiaohong
    Li, Yang
    Ma, Jianbing
    Huang, Yuanchi
    Xu, Chao
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 4263 - 4276
  • [46] CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE ARABIC VERSION OF THE INTERMITTENT AND CONSTANT OSTEOARTHRITIS PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE
    Nasef, S. I.
    El-Shafei, T. M.
    Fahim, A. E.
    Ghaly, M. S.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 30 : S431 - S431
  • [47] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Body Perception Questionnaire
    Cerritelli, Francesco
    Galli, Matteo
    Consorti, Giacomo
    D'Alessandro, Giandomenico
    Kolacz, Jacek
    Porges, Stephen W.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [48] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the SCOPA-Sleep-German version
    Goebel, Simone
    Steinmann, Elisabeth
    Leplow, Bernd
    Mehdorn, H. Maximilian
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 39 (07) : 1225 - 1230
  • [49] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the SCOPA-Sleep—German version
    Simone Goebel
    Elisabeth Steinmann
    Bernd Leplow
    H. Maximilian Mehdorn
    Neurological Sciences, 2018, 39 : 1225 - 1230
  • [50] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Malay Version of the Short Sensory Profile
    Ee, Su Im
    Loh, Siew Yim
    Chinna, Karuthan
    Marret, Mary J.
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2016, 36 (02) : 117 - 130