Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health

被引:0
|
作者
Francis, Cathy J. [1 ]
Hazelton, Michael [1 ]
Wilson, Rhonda L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, Dept Nursing, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] NSW Hlth, Cent Coast Local Hlth Dist, Gosford, NSW, Australia
关键词
mental health; person-centred care; shared decision-making; supported decision-making; UNCRPD; PSYCHIATRIC ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; JOINT CRISIS PLANS; BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER; SERVICE USER; SELF-MANAGEMENT; PERSPECTIVES; MEDICATION; SAFETY; INDIVIDUALS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/hex.70134
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMost people with mental ill health want to be involved in decision-making about their care, many mental health professionals now recognise the importance of this (at least in-principle) and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities enshrines the ethical imperative to support people in making their own treatment decisions. Nonetheless, there are widespread reports of people with mental ill health being excluded from decision-making about their treatment in practice.ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed method research on interventions to improve opportunities for the involvement of mental healthcare service users in treatment planning. We sought to consolidate and understand the evidence on the outcomes of shared and supported decision-making for people with mental ill health.MethodsSeven databases were searched and 5137 articles were screened. Articles were included if they reported on an intervention for adult service users, were published between 2008 and October 2023 and were in English. Evidence in the 140 included articles was synthesised according to the JBI guidance on Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews.ResultsThere was evidence relating to the effects of these interventions on a range of outcomes for people with mental ill health, including on: suicidal crisis, symptoms, recovery, hospital admissions, treatment engagement and on the use of coercion by health professionals. There is favourable evidence for these types of interventions in improving some outcomes for people with mental ill health, more so than treatment-as-usual. For other outcomes, the evidence is preliminary but promising. Some areas for caution are also identified.ConclusionsThe review indicates that when the involvement of people with mental ill health in treatment planning is supported, there can be improved outcomes for their health and care. Areas for future research are highlighted.Patient or Public ContributionThis systematic review has been guided at all stages by a researcher with experience of mental health service use, who does not wish to be identified at this point in time. The findings may inform organisations, researchers and practitioners on the benefits of implementing supported decision-making, for the greater involvement of people with mental ill health in their healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Forensic mental health expert testimony and judicial decision-making: A systematic literature review
    van Es, R. M. S.
    Kunst, M. J. J.
    de Keijser, J. W.
    AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2020, 51
  • [22] Mental health in juvenile judges' decision-making: Review of literature
    Cappon, Leen
    Laenen, Freya Vander
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 36 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [23] The decision-making of the Mental Health Review Tribunal in New Zealand
    Thom, Katey
    Black, Stella
    Panther, Graham
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (03) : 667 - 678
  • [24] A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions
    Powell, Byron J.
    Proctor, Enola K.
    Glass, Joseph E.
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2014, 24 (02) : 192 - 212
  • [25] Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health
    Bavol'ar, Jozef
    Orosova, Ol'ga
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 10 (01): : 115 - 122
  • [26] Health literacy, health literacy interventions and decision-making: a systematic literature review
    Zolbin, Maedeh Ghorbanian
    Huvila, Isto
    Nikou, Shahrokh
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2022, 78 (07) : 405 - 428
  • [27] Bioethical procedure for decision-making in mental health
    Ramos Pozon, Sergio
    REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL, 2016, 9 (04): : 230 - 230
  • [28] Involving older people with multimorbidity in decision-making about their primary healthcare: A Cochrane systematic review of interventions (abridged)
    Butterworth, J. E.
    Hays, R.
    McDonagh, S. T. J.
    Bower, P.
    Pitchforth, E.
    Richards, S. H.
    Campbell, J. L.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (10) : 2078 - 2094
  • [29] A Review of Treatment Decision-Making Models and Factors in Mental Health Practice
    Verbist, A. Nathan
    Winters, Andrew M.
    Antle, Becky F.
    Collins-Camargo, Crystal
    FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SERVICES, 2020, 101 (04): : 444 - 455
  • [30] Person-Centred Decision-Making in Mental Health: A Scoping Review
    Hormazabal-Salgado, Raul
    Whitehead, Dean
    Osman, Abdi D.
    Hills, Danny
    ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 45 (03) : 294 - 310