Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health

被引:0
|
作者
Francis, Cathy J. [1 ]
Hazelton, Michael [1 ]
Wilson, Rhonda L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, Dept Nursing, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] NSW Hlth, Cent Coast Local Hlth Dist, Gosford, NSW, Australia
关键词
mental health; person-centred care; shared decision-making; supported decision-making; UNCRPD; PSYCHIATRIC ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; JOINT CRISIS PLANS; BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER; SERVICE USER; SELF-MANAGEMENT; PERSPECTIVES; MEDICATION; SAFETY; INDIVIDUALS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/hex.70134
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMost people with mental ill health want to be involved in decision-making about their care, many mental health professionals now recognise the importance of this (at least in-principle) and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities enshrines the ethical imperative to support people in making their own treatment decisions. Nonetheless, there are widespread reports of people with mental ill health being excluded from decision-making about their treatment in practice.ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed method research on interventions to improve opportunities for the involvement of mental healthcare service users in treatment planning. We sought to consolidate and understand the evidence on the outcomes of shared and supported decision-making for people with mental ill health.MethodsSeven databases were searched and 5137 articles were screened. Articles were included if they reported on an intervention for adult service users, were published between 2008 and October 2023 and were in English. Evidence in the 140 included articles was synthesised according to the JBI guidance on Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews.ResultsThere was evidence relating to the effects of these interventions on a range of outcomes for people with mental ill health, including on: suicidal crisis, symptoms, recovery, hospital admissions, treatment engagement and on the use of coercion by health professionals. There is favourable evidence for these types of interventions in improving some outcomes for people with mental ill health, more so than treatment-as-usual. For other outcomes, the evidence is preliminary but promising. Some areas for caution are also identified.ConclusionsThe review indicates that when the involvement of people with mental ill health in treatment planning is supported, there can be improved outcomes for their health and care. Areas for future research are highlighted.Patient or Public ContributionThis systematic review has been guided at all stages by a researcher with experience of mental health service use, who does not wish to be identified at this point in time. The findings may inform organisations, researchers and practitioners on the benefits of implementing supported decision-making, for the greater involvement of people with mental ill health in their healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers
    Francis, Cathy J.
    Johnson, Amanda
    Wilson, Rhonda L.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (02)
  • [2] Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions
    Aoki, Yumi
    Yaju, Yukari
    Utsumi, Tomohiro
    Sanyaolu, Leigh
    Storm, Marianne
    Takaesu, Yoshikazu
    Watanabe, Koichiro
    Watanabe, Norio
    Duncan, Edward
    Edwards, Adrian G. K.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (11):
  • [3] Supported decision-making in mental health treatment planning: A systematic, integrative review
    Francis, Cathy
    Wilson, Rhonda
    Johnson, Amanda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 32 : 16 - 16
  • [4] Supported decision making for people with mental health disorders in clinical practice: a systematic review
    Penzenstadler, Louise
    Molodynski, Andrew
    Khazaal, Yasser
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 24 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [5] Digital Shared Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vitger, Tobias
    Korsbek, Lisa
    Austin, Stephen F.
    Petersen, Lone
    Nordentoft, Merete
    Hjorthoj, Carsten
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [6] Shared decision-making in mental and behavioural health interventions
    Trusty, Wilson T.
    Penix, Elizabeth A.
    Dimmick, A. Andrew
    Swift, Joshua K.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06) : 1210 - 1216
  • [7] SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING AND THE MENTAL HEALTH TRIBUNAL IN VICTORIA
    Brophy, L.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 50 : 43 - 44
  • [8] Supported Decision-Making for Persons with Mental Illness: A Review
    Pathare, Soumitra
    Shields, Laura S.
    PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS, 2012, 34 (02)
  • [9] Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions
    Duncan, E.
    Best, C.
    Hagen, S.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (01):
  • [10] Communication and decision-making in mental health: A systematic review focusing on Bipolar disorder
    Fisher, Alana
    Manicavasagar, Vijaya
    Kiln, Felicity
    Juraskova, Ilona
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (07) : 1106 - 1120