Perioperative Infection Prophylaxis With Vancomycin is a Significant Risk Factor for Deep Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Kazarian, Gregory S. [1 ]
Mok, Jung K. [1 ]
Johnson, Mitchell [1 ]
Jordan, Yusef Y. [1 ]
Hirase, Takashi [1 ]
Subramanian, Tejas [1 ]
Brause, Barry [1 ]
Kim, Han Jo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
infection; perioperative prophylaxis; vancomycin; cefazolin; Ancef; intravenous; topical; TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; CEPHALOSPORIN; PENICILLIN; CEFAZOLIN; FUSION; SCOLIOSIS; ALLERGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000005081
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design.Retrospective cohort. Objective.The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of cefazolin versus vancomycin for perioperative infection prophylaxis. Summary of Background Data.The relative efficacy of cefazolin alternatives for perioperative infection prophylaxis is poorly understood. Materials and Methods.This study was a single-center multisurgeon retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary spine surgery from an institutional registry. Postoperative infection was defined by the combination of three criteria: irrigation and debridement within 3 months of the index procedure, clinical suspicion for infection, and positive intraoperative cultures. Microbiology records for all infections were reviewed to assess the infectious organism and organism susceptibilities. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results.A total of 10,122 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of infection was 0.78%, with an incidence of 0.73% in patients who received cefazolin and 2.03% in patients who received vancomycin (OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.35-5.91, P=0.004). Use of IV vancomycin (OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.35-5.91, P=0.006), BMI (MD: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.32-2.79, P=0.014), presence of a fusion (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.04-2.52, P=0.033), and operative time (MD: 42.04, 95% CI: 16.88-67.21, P=0.001) were significant risk factors in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, only noncefazolin antibiotics (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.18-5.22, P=0.017) and BMI (MD: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.32-2.79, P=0.026) remained significant independent risk factors. Neither IV antibiotic regimen nor topical vancomycin significantly impacted Gram type, organism type, or antibiotic resistance (P>0.05). The most common reason for antibiosis with vancomycin was a penicillin allergy (75.0%). Conclusions.Prophylactic antibiosis with IV vancomycin leads to a 2.5 times higher risk of infection compared with IV cefazolin in primary spine surgery. We recommend the routine use of IV cefazolin for infection prophylaxis, and caution against the elective use of alternative regimens like IV vancomycin unless clinically warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1583 / 1590
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Topical Vancomycin in Pediatric Spine Surgery Does Not Reduce Surgical Site Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Garg S.
    Bloch N.
    Potter M.
    Quick H.
    Palmer C.
    Michael N.
    O'Donnell C.
    Erickson M.
    Spine Deformity, 2018, 6 (5) : 523 - 528
  • [32] Decreasing Wound Infection and Deep Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery: The Benefits of Minimally Invasive Surgery and a Rigorous Perioperative Protocol
    Perez, Rafael
    Adams, Paige C.
    Elnagar, Jaafar
    Schoonyoung, Henry
    Marks, John H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (05) : E28 - E28
  • [33] Independent risk factor for surgical site infection after orthopedic surgery
    Feng, Yingfa
    Feng, Qi
    Guo, Peng
    Wang, Dong-lai
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (52) : E32429
  • [34] Prophylaxis for surgical site infection
    Yamamoto, Shingo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 136 - 136
  • [35] Prevalence of Spin in Reviews on Intrawound Application of Vancomycin for Surgical Site Prophylaxis in Spine Surgery
    Telang, Sahil S.
    Podosin, Mallory A.
    Fathi, Amir
    Kotlier, Jacob L.
    Feingold, Cailan L.
    Alluri, Ram K.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [36] High Perioperative Oxygen Fraction for Abdominal Surgery and Risk of Surgical Site Infection Reply
    Meyhoff, Christian S.
    Jorgensen, Lars N.
    Rasmussen, Lars S.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (06): : 515 - 515
  • [37] Perioperative blood transfusion increases risk of surgical site infection after bariatric surgery
    Higgins, Rana M.
    Helm, Melissa C.
    Kindel, Tammy L.
    Gould, Jon C.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2019, 15 (04) : 582 - 587
  • [38] Surgical Site Infection in Thoracic Surgery Is Not Associated With Perioperative Hypothermia
    Nguyen, Albert P.
    Tran, Minh
    Khoche, Swapnil
    Gabriel, Rodney A.
    Schmidt, Ulrich
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [39] Surgical site infection prophylaxis with intra-wound vancomycin powder for uninstrumented spine surgeries: a meta-analysis
    Connor Zale
    Marc Nicholes
    Serena Hu
    JMatthew Cage
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 4259 - 4264
  • [40] Failure to Redose Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Long Surgery Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection
    Kasatpibal, Nongyao
    Whitney, Joanne D.
    Dellinger, E. Patchen
    Nair, Bala G.
    Pike, Kenneth C.
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2017, 18 (04) : 474 - 484