Perioperative Infection Prophylaxis With Vancomycin is a Significant Risk Factor for Deep Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Kazarian, Gregory S. [1 ]
Mok, Jung K. [1 ]
Johnson, Mitchell [1 ]
Jordan, Yusef Y. [1 ]
Hirase, Takashi [1 ]
Subramanian, Tejas [1 ]
Brause, Barry [1 ]
Kim, Han Jo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
infection; perioperative prophylaxis; vancomycin; cefazolin; Ancef; intravenous; topical; TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; CEPHALOSPORIN; PENICILLIN; CEFAZOLIN; FUSION; SCOLIOSIS; ALLERGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000005081
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design.Retrospective cohort. Objective.The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of cefazolin versus vancomycin for perioperative infection prophylaxis. Summary of Background Data.The relative efficacy of cefazolin alternatives for perioperative infection prophylaxis is poorly understood. Materials and Methods.This study was a single-center multisurgeon retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary spine surgery from an institutional registry. Postoperative infection was defined by the combination of three criteria: irrigation and debridement within 3 months of the index procedure, clinical suspicion for infection, and positive intraoperative cultures. Microbiology records for all infections were reviewed to assess the infectious organism and organism susceptibilities. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results.A total of 10,122 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of infection was 0.78%, with an incidence of 0.73% in patients who received cefazolin and 2.03% in patients who received vancomycin (OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.35-5.91, P=0.004). Use of IV vancomycin (OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.35-5.91, P=0.006), BMI (MD: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.32-2.79, P=0.014), presence of a fusion (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.04-2.52, P=0.033), and operative time (MD: 42.04, 95% CI: 16.88-67.21, P=0.001) were significant risk factors in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, only noncefazolin antibiotics (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.18-5.22, P=0.017) and BMI (MD: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.32-2.79, P=0.026) remained significant independent risk factors. Neither IV antibiotic regimen nor topical vancomycin significantly impacted Gram type, organism type, or antibiotic resistance (P>0.05). The most common reason for antibiosis with vancomycin was a penicillin allergy (75.0%). Conclusions.Prophylactic antibiosis with IV vancomycin leads to a 2.5 times higher risk of infection compared with IV cefazolin in primary spine surgery. We recommend the routine use of IV cefazolin for infection prophylaxis, and caution against the elective use of alternative regimens like IV vancomycin unless clinically warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1583 / 1590
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intrawound Vancomycin powder as the prophylaxis of surgical site infection after invasive spine surgery with a high risk of infection
    Hida, Tetsuro
    Ando, Kei
    Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
    Ito, Kenyu
    Tsushima, Mikito
    Matsumoto, Akiyuki
    Morozumi, Masayoshi
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Machino, Masaaki
    Ota, Kyotaro
    Kanbara, Shunsuke
    Ito, Sadayuki
    Nishida, Yoshihiro
    Ishiguro, Naoki
    Imagama, Shiro
    NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 79 (04): : 545 - 550
  • [2] Vancomycin Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infection in Clean Orthopedic Surgery
    Kanj, Wajdi W.
    Flynn, John M.
    Spiegel, David A.
    Dormans, John P.
    Baldwin, Keith D.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 36 (02) : 138 - 146
  • [3] Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis and Wound Management in Spine Surgery
    White, Alexandra J.
    Fiani, Brian
    Jarrah, Ryan
    Momin, Arbaz A.
    Rasouli, Jonathan
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (03) : 451 - 461
  • [4] Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery: Who Is at Risk?
    Yao, Reina
    Zhou, Hanbing
    Choma, Theodore J.
    Kwon, Brian K.
    Street, John
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 : 5S - 30S
  • [5] Prophylaxis of surgical site infection in adult spine surgery: A systematic review
    Yao, Reina
    Tan, Terence
    Tee, Jin Wee
    Street, John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 52 : 5 - 25
  • [6] Perioperative infection prophylaxis and risk factor impact in colon surgery
    Rau, HG
    Mittelkötter, U
    Zimmermann, A
    Lachmann, A
    Köhler, L
    Kullmann, KH
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 46 (05) : 353 - 363
  • [7] Spine surgery - the use of vancomycin powder in surgical site for postoperative infection prevention
    Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes
    Milano, Jeronimo Buzetti
    Daniel, Jefferson Walter
    Rolemberg Dantas, Fernando Luiz
    Onishi, Franz Jooji
    Bertolini, Eduardo de Freitas
    Mudo, Marcelo Luiz
    Botelho, Ricardo Vieira
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2018, 64 (08): : 663 - 669
  • [8] Does Intrawound Vancomycin Decrease Postoperative Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery
    Pinter, Zachariah
    Honig, Rachel
    Sebastian, Arjun
    Nassr, Ahmad
    Freedman, Brett
    Yaszemski, Michael
    Huddleston, Paul
    Berbari, Elie
    Currier, Bradford
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (06): : E264 - E268
  • [9] Intrawound Vancomycin Decreases the Risk of Surgical Site Infection After Posterior Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Analysis
    Devin, Clinton J.
    Chotai, Silky
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Youssef, Jim A.
    Orndorff, Douglas G.
    Arnold, Paul M.
    Frempong-Boadu, Anthony K.
    Lieberman, Isador H.
    Branch, Charles
    Hedayat, Hirad S.
    Liu, Ann
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    Radcliff, Kris E.
    Patt, Joshua C.
    Archer, Kristin R.
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [10] When is vancomycin prophylaxis necessary? Risk factors for MRSA surgical site infection
    Nguyen, Cynthia T.
    Baccile, Rachel
    Brown, Amanda M.
    Lew, Alison K.
    Pisano, Jennifer
    Pettit, Natasha N.
    ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP & HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 4 (01):