Quality disclosure in agricultural supply chains: farmer versus platform disclosure

被引:0
|
作者
Tan, Yong [1 ]
Zhou, Ziwei [1 ]
Guan, Xu [2 ]
Jiang, Yuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Polytech Univ, Sch Management, Wuhan 430048, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Econ, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
quality disclosure; information asymmetry; farmer disclosure format; platform disclosure format; agricultural economics; INFORMATION; ACQUISITION; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1111/itor.70008
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the firms' equilibrium disclosure strategies in an agricultural supply chain, wherein the farmer sells agricultural products through an intermediary platform to the end market. Both the farmer and the platform privately observe the product quality information and independently determine whether to disclose this information to the consumers. We examine two disclosure formats, farmer disclosure format and platform disclosure format, depending on who is responsible for quality disclosure. Our analysis reveals that the commission rate exerts a nontrivial impact on the farmer's and platform's disclosure incentive and their profits. The farmer has the incentive to disclose the quality information only when the commission rate is low, while the platform chooses to disclose the quality information only when the commission rate is high. Additionally, under farmer (platform) disclosure format, the platform's (farmer's) profit exhibits nonmonotonic pattern with respect to the commission rate when the disclosure cost is low. Moreover, we show that both the farmer and the platform may opt to take the disclosure responsibility by itself, and in certain conditions, their preferences for two disclosure formats could be aligned, resulting in a "win-win" situation for both parties.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impacts of distributional fairness concerns on quality disclosure in a dyadic supply chain
    Ding, Long
    Huang, He
    Yuan, Hongping
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 182
  • [32] Quality Improvement in African Food Supply Chains: Determinants of Farmer Performance
    Tefera, Delelegne Abera
    Bijman, Jos
    Slingerland, Maja
    van der Velde, Gerben
    Omta, Onno
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (01): : 152 - 175
  • [33] Quality Improvement in African Food Supply Chains: Determinants of Farmer Performance
    Delelegne Abera Tefera
    Jos Bijman
    Maja Slingerland
    Gerben van der Velde
    Onno Omta
    The European Journal of Development Research, 2020, 32 : 152 - 175
  • [34] Voluntary versus mandatory disclosure
    Bertomeu, Jeremy
    Vaysman, Igor
    Xue, Wenjie
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2021, 26 (02) : 658 - 692
  • [35] Voluntary versus mandatory disclosure
    Jeremy Bertomeu
    Igor Vaysman
    Wenjie Xue
    Review of Accounting Studies, 2021, 26 : 658 - 692
  • [36] Platform-enabled information disclosure
    Gambato, Jacopo
    Peitz, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2025, 99
  • [37] Supply chain disclosure and ethical sourcing
    Chen, Jen-Yi
    Slotnick, Susan A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 161 : 17 - 30
  • [38] THE LIMITATIONS OF SUPPLY CHAIN DISCLOSURE REGIMES
    Chilton, Adam S.
    Sarfaty, Galit A.
    STANFORD JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2017, 53 (01) : 1 - 54
  • [39] Platform financing or bank financing in agricultural supply chains: The impact of platform digital empowerment
    Lu, Qihui
    Liao, Changhua
    Chen, Meilan
    Shi, Victor
    Hu, Xiangling
    Hu, Weiwei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 315 (03) : 952 - 964
  • [40] RELIGION AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE QUALITY
    Oh, Frederick Dongchuhl
    Shin, Donglim
    HITOTSUBASHI JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2020, 61 (01) : 20 - 37