Quality disclosure in agricultural supply chains: farmer versus platform disclosure

被引:0
|
作者
Tan, Yong [1 ]
Zhou, Ziwei [1 ]
Guan, Xu [2 ]
Jiang, Yuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Polytech Univ, Sch Management, Wuhan 430048, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Econ, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
quality disclosure; information asymmetry; farmer disclosure format; platform disclosure format; agricultural economics; INFORMATION; ACQUISITION; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1111/itor.70008
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the firms' equilibrium disclosure strategies in an agricultural supply chain, wherein the farmer sells agricultural products through an intermediary platform to the end market. Both the farmer and the platform privately observe the product quality information and independently determine whether to disclose this information to the consumers. We examine two disclosure formats, farmer disclosure format and platform disclosure format, depending on who is responsible for quality disclosure. Our analysis reveals that the commission rate exerts a nontrivial impact on the farmer's and platform's disclosure incentive and their profits. The farmer has the incentive to disclose the quality information only when the commission rate is low, while the platform chooses to disclose the quality information only when the commission rate is high. Additionally, under farmer (platform) disclosure format, the platform's (farmer's) profit exhibits nonmonotonic pattern with respect to the commission rate when the disclosure cost is low. Moreover, we show that both the farmer and the platform may opt to take the disclosure responsibility by itself, and in certain conditions, their preferences for two disclosure formats could be aligned, resulting in a "win-win" situation for both parties.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality disclosure strategy with asymmetric demand information in food supply chains
    Yu, Yanan
    He, Yong
    Guo, Xiaotong
    Li, Dong
    Huang, Hongfu
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2024, 183
  • [2] Disclosure quality of biological assets in agricultural cooperatives
    Flach, Leonardo
    de Mattos, Luisa Karam
    CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2019, 15 (02): : 116 - 139
  • [3] COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY AND THE LIMITS OF DISCLOSURE IN REGULATING GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAINS
    Villiers, Charlotte
    DEAKIN LAW REVIEW, 2018, 23 : 143 - 176
  • [4] Information Disclosure Policy and Its Implications: Ratcheting in Supply Chains
    Mittendorf, Brian
    Shin, Jiwoong
    Yoon, Dae-Hee
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2022, 59 (02) : 290 - 305
  • [5] Price signal or blockchain technology? Quality information disclosure in dual-channel supply chains
    Zhang, Qian
    Li, Yongjian
    Hou, Pengwen
    Wang, Jun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 316 (01) : 126 - 137
  • [6] CSR disclosure quantity to CSR disclosure quality - in pursuit of a disclosure quality index
    Hameed, Faisal
    Wilmshurst, Trevor
    Horner, Claire
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2024, 36 (3/4) : 433 - 467
  • [7] Quality disclosure in a dual-channel supply chain with an online dual-purpose platform
    Huang, Song
    Xu, Jiawen
    Wang, Yun
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2025, 193
  • [8] Information disclosure quality: correlation versus precision
    Cheung, Adrian
    Hu, Wei
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2019, 59 (02): : 1033 - 1053
  • [9] Product upgrade and advanced quality disclosure in a supply chain
    Liu, Yang
    Shen, Bin
    Ivanov, Dmitry
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 198
  • [10] Quality information disclosure and advertising strategy in a supply chain
    Hong, Xianpei
    Zhou, Meiling
    Gong, Yeming
    Chen, Wanying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2023, 61 (19) : 6291 - 6307