Efficacy and safety of laquinimod versus placebo in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Zeb Khan, Malik Waleed [1 ]
Ali, Aizaz [2 ]
Hussain, Amna [3 ]
Khan, Safeena [2 ]
Tahir, Ammara [3 ]
Khan, Muhammad Haris [4 ]
Azeem, Touba [2 ]
Moeez, Abdul [2 ]
Monis, Arysha [5 ]
Mian, Aban Masaud [2 ]
Khattak, Fazia [2 ]
Ali, Moosa [6 ]
Ikram, Jibran [7 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Imaging, CT USA, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Khyber Med Coll, Dept Med, Peshawar, Pakistan
[3] Liaquat Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Jamshoro, Pakistan
[4] Saidu Med Coll, Dept Med, Swat, Pakistan
[5] Baqai Med Univ, Dept Med, Karachi, Pakistan
[6] Khyber Med Coll, Dept Community Med, Peshawar, Pakistan
[7] Cleveland Clin, Dept Outcomes Res, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; laquinimod; relapsing-remitting; meta-analysis; disability; adverse event; disease-modifying therapy; secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; randomized controlled trial; ORAL LAQUINIMOD; DOUBLE-BLIND; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1177/03000605241311437
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of laquinimod in treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).Methods An extensive electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify suitable studies. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1.Results The meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials including 3665 patients found that laquinimod significantly reduced the annualized relapse rate compared with placebo (mean difference = -0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.12, -0.04, I2 = 0%). For disability progression confirmed at 3 months, laquinimod provided a significant advantage over placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.96, I2 = 25%), whereas no benefit was achieved at 6 months (HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.45, 1.06, I2 = 66%). Laquinimod was also significantly better than placebo in maintaining a relapse-free status (risk ratio [RR] = 1.14 95% CI = 1.06, 1.22, I2 = 10%). Laquinimod had a comparable safety profile as placebo (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.81, 1.39, I2 = 33%).Conclusions These findings support the efficacy of laquinimod in managing RRMS but necessitate careful monitoring during treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis in highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and rapidly evolving severe multiple sclerosis
    Huisman, Eline
    Papadimitropoulou, Katerina
    Jarrett, James
    Bending, Matthew
    Firth, Zoe
    Allen, Felicity
    Adlard, Nick
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [42] Safety and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
    Yan, Zeya
    Gu, Feng
    Wang, Zilan
    Meng, Jiahao
    Tao, Xinyu
    Dai, Qiling
    Wang, Wei
    Liu, Meirong
    Wang, Zhong
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [43] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GINGER IN OSTEOARTHRITIS PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Bartels, E. M.
    Folmer, V. N.
    Bliddal, H.
    Altman, R. D.
    Juhl, C.
    Tarp, S.
    Zhang, W.
    Christensen, R.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2014, 22 : S324 - S324
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of riluzole for depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials
    Yao, Ruzhan
    Wang, Haiquan
    Yuan, Mingqi
    Wang, Guanglin
    Wu, Chengxi
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2020, 284
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Qiao Shu-Kai
    Guo Xiao-Nan
    Ren Jin-Hai
    Ren Han-Yun
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2015, 128 (09) : 1215 - 1222
  • [46] Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Qiao, Shu-Kai
    Guo, Xiao-Nan
    Ren, Jin-Hai
    Ren, Han-Yun
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (09) : 1215 - 1222
  • [47] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of caplacizumab versus placebo in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a meta-analysis and systematic review based on randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Bin
    Li, Xihong
    Xiao, Dongqiong
    Raimundo, Rodrigo Daminello
    Zhou, Ruixi
    Lei, Yupeng
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus placebo in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Ligang
    Shi, Hekai
    Xie, Merilyn
    Sun, Yuxiao
    Nahata, Milap C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 46 (06) : 1268 - 1280
  • [49] The efficacy and safety of fluoxetine versus placebo for stroke recovery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wu, Jixiang
    Qin, Guoyong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (04) : 839 - 846
  • [50] The efficacy and safety of fluoxetine versus placebo for stroke recovery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jixiang Wu
    Guoyong Qin
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2023, 45 : 839 - 846