Forecasting drought using machine learning: a systematic literature review

被引:0
|
作者
Oyarzabal, Ricardo S. [1 ]
Santos, Leonardo B. L. [1 ]
Cunningham, Christopher [1 ]
Broedel, Elisangela [1 ]
de Lima, Glauston R. T. [1 ]
Cunha-Zeri, Gisleine [2 ]
Peixoto, Jerusa S. [1 ]
Anochi, Juliana A. [2 ]
Garcia, Klaifer [1 ]
Costa, Lidiane C. O. [1 ]
Pampuch, Luana A. [3 ]
Cuartas, Luz Adriana [1 ]
Zeri, Marcelo [1 ]
Guedes, Marcia R. G. [1 ]
Negri, Rogerio G. [3 ]
Munoz, Viviana A. [1 ]
Cunha, Ana Paula M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Monitoring & Early Warning Nat Disasters, BR-12247016 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[2] Natl Inst Space Res INPE, BR-12227010 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, BR-12247016 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Machine learning; Drought forecasting; Climate change; Systematic literature review; LEVEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-025-07195-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The number of reported drought events per year and their impacts have significantly increased in the last two decades. In addition to monitoring drought conditions, forecasting is essential for planning activities. Various Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have experienced a substantial increase in popularity in geoscience applications. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review on drought forecasting utilizing Machine Learning models. Following the PRISMA 2020 protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), the total number of papers was reduced from approximately a thousand to a hundred. The majority of the papers found study areas from Asia and Oceania. Meteorological drought was the most studied event in the articles evaluated due to the greater ease of its estimation using only rainfall data. The Standardized Precipitation Index and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index are the most widely used indices in research relating to drought and Machine Learning. Precipitation is the most commonly used input among the various input data used in ML models. Remote sensing has yet to be widely used in drought forecasting, with less than 20% of papers utilizing remote sensing data. What still needs to be addressed is drought forecasting in the time scale of days, which is less utilized compared to the monthly scale. The regression method is the most commonly used, with 77% of papers utilizing it. In conclusion, we formulated five recommendations based on the critical evidence and insights from our review: (1) it is essential to foster interdisciplinary collaborations among experts in ML, climatology, and hydrology while investing in initiatives that promote the sharing of data and code repositories; (2) satellite remote sensing technologies and crowd-sourced data collection methods should be considered in ML studies while enhancing existing monitoring infrastructure to increase the spatial and temporal coverage of datasets for validation of ML methods; (3) it is recommended to increase the availability of additional environmental variables, such as soil moisture and vegetation health, to promote more studies of agricultural drought and ML methods; (4) it is crucial to prioritize the integration of daily-scale climate data into drought modeling and forecasting for developing effective adaptation and mitigation measures to flash drought events; and finally (5) ethical considerations of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for drought forecasting, emphasizing the environmental impact, issues of digital sovereignty, and the urgent need for a broader dialogue on AI's role in sustainable climate solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Convergence of Gamification and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
    Alireza Khakpour
    Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
    Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2021, 26 : 597 - 636
  • [32] Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Mathematical Models to Analyze Forecasting and Epidemiology of COVID-19: A Systematic Literature Review
    Saleem, Farrukh
    Al-Ghamdi, Abdullah Saad Al-Malaise
    Alassafi, Madini O.
    AlGhamdi, Saad Abdulla
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (09)
  • [33] Applications of machine learning to BIM: A systematic literature review
    Zabin, Asem
    Gonzalez, Vicente A.
    Zou, Yang
    Amor, Robert
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2022, 51
  • [34] A Systematic Literature Review on Machine Learning in Shared Mobility
    Teusch, Julian
    Gremmel, Jan Niklas
    Koetsier, Christian
    Johora, Fatema Tuj
    Sester, Monika
    Woisetschlaeger, David M.
    Mueller, Jorg P.
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 4 : 870 - 899
  • [35] Data cleaning and machine learning: a systematic literature review
    Cote, Pierre-Olivier
    Nikanjam, Amin
    Ahmed, Nafisa
    Humeniuk, Dmytro
    Khomh, Foutse
    AUTOMATED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2024, 31 (02)
  • [36] Adversarial Machine Learning in Industry: A Systematic Literature Review
    Jedrzejewski, Felix Viktor
    Thode, Lukas
    Fischbach, Jannik
    Gorschek, Tony
    Mendez, Daniel
    Lavesson, Niklas
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2024, 145
  • [37] Systematic Literature Review of Machine Learning for IoT Security
    Yemmanuru, Prathibha Kiran
    Yeboah, Jones
    Esther, Khakata N. G.
    2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, CSCI 2023, 2023, : 227 - 233
  • [38] Operationalizing Machine Learning Models - A Systematic Literature Review
    Kolltveit, Ask Berstad
    Li, Jingyue
    2022 IEEE/ACM 1ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR RESPONSIBLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (SE4RAI 2022), 2022, : 1 - 8
  • [39] Machine learning techniques in chemostratigraphy: A systematic literature review
    Garcia, Luciano Garim
    Ramos, Gabriel de Oliveira
    Teixeira, Jose Manuel Marques
    da Silveira, Ariane Santos
    Cardoso Jr, Marcio
    de Oliveira, Rita Gausina
    Rigo, Sandro Jose
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 243
  • [40] Cyberbullying detection and machine learning: a systematic literature review
    Vimala Balakrisnan
    Mohammed Kaity
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56 : 1375 - 1416