Harnessing Novel Data-Driven Techniques for Precise Rainfall-Runoff Modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Sammen, Saad Sh. [1 ]
Mohammadpour, Reza [2 ]
Alsafadi, Karam [3 ]
Mokhtar, Ali [4 ]
Shahid, Shamsuddin [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Diyala, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Baqubah, Diyala Governor, Iraq
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Estahban Branch, Estahban, Iran
[3] Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Key Lab, Minist Educ Coastal & Wetland Ecosyst, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Cairo Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Engn, Giza, Egypt
[5] Natl Ctr Meteodol, Reginla Climate Change Ctr, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
来源
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT | 2025年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
ANN plus Cuckoo; GMDH; hybrid models; machine learning; rainfall-runoff modeling; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; IMPROVING FORECASTING ACCURACY; NEURAL-NETWORK; HYBRID APPROACH; STREAMFLOW; UNCERTAINTY; SIMULATION; PREDICTION; CATCHMENT; FLOW;
D O I
10.1111/jfr3.70013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rainfall and runoff are considered the main components of the hydrological cycle, and their forecasting is of great significance in water resource management, particularly for reservoir operation. Developing an accurate model to capture the dynamic connection between rainfall and runoff remains problematic and challenging in water resource management due to the nonstationary characteristics of hydrologic processes and the effects of noise. In this study, data-driven techniques, such as the group method of data handling (GMDH), extreme learning machine (ELM), and two hybrids of artificial neural network (ANN) with Cuckoo search algorithm (ANN + Cuckoo) and genetic algorithm (ANN + GA) were used to model the rainfall-runoff relationship. For a comprehensive analysis, four scenarios were examined based on the different input combinations to test and select the best scenario and best model performance. The results indicated that the performance of ELM and GMDH in predicting runoff was more accurate than that of ANN + Cuckoo and ANN + GA. Although the GMDH predicts runoff with higher accuracy, ELM provides reliable performance in simulating both low and high values. The models' performance can be ranked based on the testing data in the following order: GMDH, ELM, ANN + GA, and ANN + CUKOO. The root mean squared error (RMSE) was recorded as 56.7 and 69.7 m3/s for the GMDH and ELM models, respectively. These low RMSE values highlight the potential of these models in effectively addressing the challenges associated with the complexity of rainfall-runoff simulations. Moreover, the results demonstrate that the machine learning models could be used as a simple, rapid, and inexpensive approach for timely and reliable runoff prediction that is expected to benefit reservoir management.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Benchmarking data-driven rainfall-runoff modeling across 54 catchments in the Yellow River Basin: Overfitting, calibration length, dry frequency
    Jin, Jin
    Zhang, Yanning
    Hao, Zhen
    Xia, Runliang
    Yang, Wushuang
    Yin, Hanlin
    Zhang, Xiuwei
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2022, 42
  • [32] Benchmarking data-driven rainfall-runoff modeling across 54 catchments in the Yellow River Basin: Overfitting, calibration length, dry frequency
    Jin, Jin
    Zhang, Yanning
    Hao, Zhen
    Xia, Runliang
    Yang, Wushuang
    Yin, Hanlin
    Zhang, Xiuwei
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2022, 42
  • [33] ERS data for rainfall-runoff models
    Halounova, L.
    Svec, M.
    Horak, J.
    Unucka, J.
    Hanzlova, M.
    Jurikovska, L.
    REMOTE SENSING FOR A CHANGING EUROPE, 2009, : 46 - 52
  • [34] Influence of lag time on event-based rainfall-runoff modeling using the data driven approach
    Talei, Amin
    Chua, Lloyd H. C.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 438 : 223 - 233
  • [35] Study on rainfall-runoff simulation and prediction in lake basin based on dynamic data-driven deep recurrent network
    Liao M.
    Zhan Z.
    Guo W.
    Pang C.
    Liu Y.
    Yaogan Xuebao/Journal of Remote Sensing, 2019, 23 (05): : 911 - 923
  • [36] Two integrated conceptual-wavelet-based data-driven model approaches for daily rainfall-runoff modelling
    Sezen, Cenk
    Partal, Turgay
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2022, 24 (05) : 949 - 975
  • [37] Assimilation of Observed Soil Moisture Data in Storm Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
    Brocca, L.
    Melone, F.
    Moramarco, T.
    Singh, V. P.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2009, 14 (02) : 153 - 165
  • [38] Impact of training data size on the LSTM performances for rainfall-runoff modeling
    Boulmaiz, T.
    Guermoui, M.
    Boutaghane, H.
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 6 (04) : 2153 - 2164
  • [39] Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: Comparison of Two Approaches with Different Data Requirements
    A. Bhadra
    A. Bandyopadhyay
    R. Singh
    N. S. Raghuwanshi
    Water Resources Management, 2010, 24 : 37 - 62
  • [40] Determining the Adequacy of CFSR Data for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Using SWAT
    Tomy, Tissa
    Sumam, K. S.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICETEST - 2015), 2016, 24 : 309 - 316