High residency of a Critically Endangered hammerhead shark to a small area: implications for marine protected area management and design

被引:0
|
作者
Herrera, Maria A. [1 ,2 ]
Cardenosa, Diego [3 ]
Papastamatiou, Yannis P. [4 ]
Vaudo, Jeremy [1 ,2 ]
Bermudez-Rivas, Christian [5 ]
Shivji, Mahmood [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nova Southeastern Univ, Guy Harvey Res Inst, Shark Res Ctr, Dania, FL 33004 USA
[2] Nova Southeastern Univ, Save Our Seas Fdn, Shark Res Ctr, Dania, FL 33004 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Global Forens & Justice Ctr, North Miami, FL 33181 USA
[4] Florida Int Univ, Inst Environm, Dept Biol Sci, North Miami, FL 33181 USA
[5] Ctr Invest Oceanog & Hidrograf Pacif, Direcc Gen Maritima DIMAR, Tumaco, Narino, Colombia
关键词
Spatial ecology; Acoustic telemetry; Residency; Movement ecology; ACOUSTIC TELEMETRY; MOVEMENT PATTERNS; TRIAKIS SEMIFASCIATA; SPHYRNA-TIBURO; LEOPARD SHARKS; SITE FIDELITY; CONSERVATION; DIET; SIZE; SEGREGATION;
D O I
10.3354/meps14658
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Hammerhead sharks are among the most iconic and threatened shark species. Research has focused on the large hammerhead species, with relatively little work conducted on their smaller-bodied relatives, which face many of the same threats. One such species, the scalloped bonnethead Sphyrna corona, is assessed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List; however, there is no knowledge about its movements, which can compromise management and conservation efforts. Here, we used acoustic telemetry to describe the spatiotemporal movements of scalloped bonnetheads inside a national park's marine protected area along the Colombian Pacific coast, where this species still occurs in high numbers. The movements of 25 adult sharks were monitored over a 1.4 km(2) area for up to similar to 10 mo between 2022 and 2023. Scalloped bonnetheads exhibited high residency to the area (RImax = 0.78 +/- 0.18, RImin = 0.59 +/- 0.32, +/- SD), with most sharks present during the majority of their monitoring period. Shark movements were influenced by tides and diel period, and the space sharks used was generally small (mean 50% utilization distribution: 0.3 +/- 0.2 km(2)), with most of their movements detected by 2 (out of 5) receivers separated by less than 2 km. These results indicate that scalloped bonnetheads spend a large amount of time in a small area, suggesting that even a spatially limited no-take zone in the National Natural Park is likely to benefit the conservation of this species. This study provides the first insights into the movement behavior of the scalloped bonnethead, with important information for its protection and management.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 63
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring biodiversity patterns in a marine and coastal protected area: Implications for management within and outside MCPAs
    Molinet, Carlos
    Diaz, Manuel
    Gonzalez, Alejandra
    Henriquez, Jorge
    Matamala, Thamara
    Boldt, Jacqueline
    Brito, Nathalie
    Espinoza, Katherine
    Lafon, Alejandra
    Merino, Patricio
    Parra, Rodrigo
    Raimilla, Victor
    Salgado, Cesar
    Valencia, Jaime
    Soto, Doris
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2023, 294
  • [42] Socioeconomic implications of recreational shore angling for the management of coastal resources in a Mediterranean marine protected area
    Font, Toni
    Lloret, Josep
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2011, 108 (01) : 214 - 217
  • [43] Recognizing the contribution of Indigenous Protected Areas to marine protected area management in Australia
    Gould, Jackie
    Smyth, Dermot
    Rassip, Whitney
    Rist, Phil
    Oxenham, Katie
    MARITIME STUDIES, 2021, 20 (01) : 5 - 26
  • [44] Recognizing the contribution of Indigenous Protected Areas to marine protected area management in Australia
    Jackie Gould
    Dermot Smyth
    Whitney Rassip
    Phil Rist
    Katie Oxenham
    Maritime Studies, 2021, 20 : 5 - 26
  • [45] Management effectiveness of a large marine protected area in Northeastern Brazil
    Araujo, Julio Lustosa
    Bernard, Enrico
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 130 : 43 - 49
  • [46] Entry fees enhance marine protected area management and outcomes
    Brown, Chris
    Ahmadia, Gabby N.
    Andradi-Brown, Dominic A.
    Arafeh-Dalmau, Nur
    Buelow, Christina A.
    Campbell, Max D.
    Edgar, Graham J.
    Geldmann, Jonas
    Gill, David
    Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2023, 283
  • [47] Tourist perception of recreational environment and management in a marine protected area
    Petrosillo, I.
    Zurlini, G.
    Corliano, M. E.
    Zaccarelli, N.
    Dadamo, M.
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2007, 79 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [48] Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management
    Brown, K
    Adger, WN
    Tompkins, E
    Bacon, P
    Shim, D
    Young, K
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 37 (03) : 417 - 434
  • [49] Using compliance data to improve marine protected area management
    Read, Andrew D.
    West, Ronald J.
    Kelaher, Brendan P.
    MARINE POLICY, 2015, 60 : 119 - 127
  • [50] Effects of management strategies on the landscape ecology of a Marine Protected Area
    Rioja-Nieto, Rodolfo
    Sheppard, Charles
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (05) : 397 - 404