A surrogate model for the variable infiltration capacity model using physics-informed machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Gu, Haiting [1 ]
Liang, Xiao [1 ]
Liu, Li [1 ]
Wang, Lu [1 ]
Guo, Yuxue [1 ]
Pan, Suli [2 ]
Xu, Yue-Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Water Sci & Engn, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Coll Water Conservancy & Environm Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
empirical orthogonal function; surrogate model; physics-informed machine learning; variable infiltration capacity model; ZANGBO RIVER-BASIN; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGY; ENSEMBLE; RUNOFF; QUANTIFICATION; ALGORITHMS; PREDICTION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.2166/wcc.2025.767
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
In this study, a physics-informed machine learning-based surrogate model (SM) for the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model was developed to improve simulation efficiency in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin. The approach combines the empirical orthogonal function decomposition of low-fidelity VIC models to extract spatial and temporal features, with machine learning techniques applied to refine temporal feature series. This allows for accurate reconstruction of high-fidelity spatial simulations from the results of the low-fidelity model. Using the SM built from the 1.0 degrees-resolution VIC model as an example, the study highlights the challenges and solutions associated with low-fidelity simulations. The SM significantly improves accuracy, achieving a Kling-Gupta efficiency of 0.88, an Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.97, and a PBIAS value of -6.21% with reduced computational demands. Additionally, different machine learning methods impact the performance of the SM, with the support vector machine regression model performing best in these methods. SMs from varying low-fidelity resolutions maintain similar accuracy, but higher resolutions notably enhance computational efficiency, reducing time by 86.31% when compared to the high-fidelity VIC model. These findings demonstrate the potential of the SM to enhance VIC model simulations while reducing computational requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 799
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimizing a Physics-Informed Machine Learning Model for Pulsatile Shear-Thinning Channel Flow
    Son, Junwon
    Park, Nayeon
    Kwak, Hyungyeol
    Nam, Jaewook
    NIHON REOROJI GAKKAISHI, 2024, 52 (02) : 113 - 122
  • [32] Physics-informed machine-learning model of temperature evolution under solid phase processes
    King, Ethan
    Li, Yulan
    Hu, Shenyang
    Machorro, Eric
    COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2023, 72 (01) : 125 - 136
  • [33] Physics-informed machine-learning model of temperature evolution under solid phase processes
    Ethan King
    Yulan Li
    Shenyang Hu
    Eric Machorro
    Computational Mechanics, 2023, 72 : 125 - 136
  • [34] A physics-informed machine learning for generalized bathtub model in large-scale urban networks
    Ka, Eunhan
    Xue, Jiawei
    Leclercq, Ludovic
    Ukkusuri, Satish, V
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 164
  • [35] A physics-informed machine learning model for the prediction of drop breakup in two-phase flows
    Cundy, Chris
    Mirjalili, Shahab
    Laurent, Charlelie
    Ermon, Stefano
    Iaccarino, Gianluca
    Mani, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2024, 180
  • [36] Physics-informed machine learning for modeling multidimensional dynamics
    Abbasi, Amirhassan
    Kambali, Prashant N.
    Shahidi, Parham
    Nataraj, C.
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2024, 112 (24) : 21565 - 21585
  • [37] Physics-Informed Machine Learning for DRAM Error Modeling
    Baseman, Elisabeth
    DeBardeleben, Nathan
    Blanchard, Sean
    Moore, Juston
    Tkachenko, Olena
    Ferreira, Kurt
    Siddiqua, Taniya
    Sridharan, Vilas
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DEFECT AND FAULT TOLERANCE IN VLSI AND NANOTECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS (DFT), 2018,
  • [38] Physics-informed Machine Learning for Modeling Turbulence in Supernovae
    Karpov, Platon I.
    Huang, Chengkun
    Sitdikov, Iskandar
    Fryer, Chris L.
    Woosley, Stan
    Pilania, Ghanshyam
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 940 (01):
  • [39] The scaling of physics-informed machine learning with data and dimensions
    Miller S.T.
    Lindner J.F.
    Choudhary A.
    Sinha S.
    Ditto W.L.
    Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: X, 2020, 5
  • [40] A Review of Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Fluid Mechanics
    Sharma, Pushan
    Chung, Wai Tong
    Akoush, Bassem
    Ihme, Matthias
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (05)