Considerations for Regulatory Reusability of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Development

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Jiang [1 ]
Yang, Yuching [1 ]
Gobburu, Joga [2 ]
Musante, Cynthia J. [3 ]
Klein, Martin [4 ]
Zhao, Liang [5 ]
Madabushi, Rajanikanth [1 ,6 ]
Zhu, Hao [1 ]
机构
[1] Food & Drug Adm FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res CDER, Off Clin Pharmacol OCP, Off Translat Sci OTS, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] Univ Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Pfizer Res & Dev, Translat Clin Sci, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] FDA, Div Biometr VIII, Off Biostat, OTS,CDER, Silver Spring, MD USA
[5] FDA, Div Quantitat Methods & Modeling, Off Res & Stand ORS, Off Gener Drugs OGD,CDER, Silver Spring, MD USA
[6] FDA, Quantitat Med Ctr Excellence, CDER, DHP, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
modeling; reusability; simulation; workshop report;
D O I
10.1007/s11095-025-03831-5
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches have become indispensable for new drug development and to address regulatory challenges. Dynamic tools, such as population pharmacokinetics (popPK), physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK), and quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models, are routinely employed to enhance the efficiency of drug development. Recently, the Fit-for-Purpose (FFP) initiative and the Model Master File (MMF) framework have emerged to support model reusability and sharing in regulatory settings. In this manuscript we share key insights from the Session "Pathways for Regulatory Acceptance of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Space" of Workshop "Considerations and Potential Regulatory Applications for a Model Master File", hosted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) and discuss the considerations for regulatory acceptance of dynamic modeling tools. Presentations at the workshop explored current practices in PBPK model evaluation, the potential for popPK models in bioequivalence (BE) assessments, and the implications of reusing models. Challenges such as context-specific validation, version control, and the impact of scientific and technological advancements on model reuse were emphasized. The workshop underscored the importance of clear regulatory pathways and structured frameworks for the consistent application of reusable models. The MMF's potential to streamline reviews and reduce redundancies was noted, although operational details require further elaboration. Continued collaboration among stakeholders is essential to refine model-sharing practices, enhance model validation processes, and promote transparency, ensuring that MIDD approaches remain robust and adaptable to evolving regulatory needs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Food And Drug Administration Gets New Tools To Spur Regulatory Science
    Norman, Brett
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (09) : 1919 - 1922
  • [22] CHIRALITY IN NEW DRUG DEVELOPMENT - CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETIC CONSIDERATIONS
    NATION, RL
    CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1994, 27 (04) : 249 - 255
  • [24] New tools and methods accelerate drug discovery and development
    Caliper Life Sciences Inc.
    Biophoton Int, 2006, 12 (44-46):
  • [25] Regulatory considerations for successful implementation of digital endpoints in clinical trials for drug development
    Erdemli, Gul
    Murphy, Tina
    Walinsky, Sarah
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2025, 8 (01):
  • [26] Scientific and Regulatory Considerations in Solid Oral Modified Release Drug Product Development
    Min Li
    Sanna Sander
    John Duan
    Susan Rosencrance
    Sarah Pope Miksinski
    Lawrence Yu
    Paul Seo
    Bhagwant Rege
    The AAPS Journal, 2016, 18 : 1406 - 1417
  • [27] Scientific and Regulatory Considerations in Solid Oral Modified Release Drug Product Development
    Li, Min
    Sander, Sanna
    Duan, John
    Rosencrance, Susan
    Miksinski, Sarah Pope
    Yu, Lawrence
    Seo, Paul
    Rege, Bhagwant
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (06): : 1406 - 1417
  • [28] Regulatory considerations of pharmaceutical solid polymorphism in abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs)
    Raw, AS
    Furness, MS
    Gill, DS
    Adams, RC
    Holcombe, FO
    Yu, LX
    ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2004, 56 (03) : 397 - 414
  • [29] Digital Tools—Regulatory Considerations for Application in Clinical Trials
    Lian Gelis
    Isabelle Stoeckert
    Hans-Peter Podhaisky
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2023, 57 : 769 - 782
  • [30] Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools
    Kirchhoff, Carol F.
    Wang, Xiao-Zhuo Michelle
    Conlon, Hugh D.
    Anderson, Scott
    Ryan, Anne M.
    Bose, Arindam
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2017, 114 (12) : 2696 - 2705