Curbing myopic R&D behavior: How private meetings serve as a channel

被引:1
|
作者
Ge, Jiaying [1 ]
Cahan, Steven F. [1 ]
Chen, Jerry W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW | 2024年 / 56卷 / 06期
关键词
Institutional investors; R & D; Private meetings; Corporate site visits; Monitoring; REAL EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; CORPORATE SITE VISITS; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM; GOVERNANCE; QUALITY; INFORMATIVENESS; DISCLOSURE; RETURNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bar.2024.101326
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study considers whether investor-manager private meetings serve as a potential channel to detect and restrain corporate myopic R&D behavior in firms subject to earnings pressure. To do so, we exploit a unique dataset of corporate site visits, a particular form of private meetings. Our results indicate that the myopic R&D behavior of firms under earnings pressure is significantly lower when the firm hosts more institutional investors' site visits. To further tease out the underlying mechanisms, we conduct cross-sectional analyses and find that the constraining effect of site visits is greater when there is more need for monitoring by institutional investors, i.e., when the information environment is weak and product market competition is low. Further, this monitoring effect is stronger when more questions are asked about R&D during the site visit, when the site visit involves more than one institutional investor, and when the site visit occurs earlier in the fiscal year. The main findings are robust to alternative model specifications, estimation approaches, and endogeneity issues. Overall, our evidence suggests that site visits cannot only reduce information asymmetry, but they have an important monitoring role as well.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Public and private incentives to R&D cooperation in Italy
    Cantabene, Claudia
    Grassi, Iacopo
    ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 28 (03) : 217 - 242
  • [42] Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors
    Kleer, Robin
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (10) : 1361 - 1374
  • [43] Private returns to R&D in the presence of spillovers, revisited
    Millo, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2019, 34 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [44] Editorial: R&D-How to Evaluate Value of R&D
    Mujumdar, Arun S.
    DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 28 (09) : 1033 - 1033
  • [45] R&D funding and private R&D: empirical evidence on the impact of the leading-edge cluster competition
    Dirk Engel
    Verena Eckl
    Michael Rothgang
    The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2019, 44 : 1720 - 1743
  • [46] Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure
    Marino, Marianna
    Lhuillery, Stephane
    Parrotta, Pierpaolo
    Sala, Davide
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (09) : 1715 - 1730
  • [47] R&D funding and private R&D: empirical evidence on the impact of the leading-edge cluster competition
    Engel, Dirk
    Eckl, Verena
    Rothgang, Michael
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2019, 44 (06): : 1720 - 1743
  • [48] How can R&D programs induce unplanned R&D collaborative networks in clusters?
    Belso-Martinez, Jose A.
    Diez-Vial, Isabel
    Lopez-Sanchez, Maria J.
    Sanchez, Maria D.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGRAPHIE, 2021, 65 (3-4): : 118 - 131
  • [49] How much is energy R&D worth?
    Energy (Norwalk, Connecticut), 2000, 25 (02):
  • [50] How Language Influences R&D Spending
    不详
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 2020, 98 (06) : 29 - 29