Crypto Volatility Forecasting: Mounting a HAR, Sentiment, and Machine Learning Horserace

被引:0
|
作者
Brauneis, Alexander [1 ]
Sahiner, Mehmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Trent Univ, Finance & Accounting, Business Sch, 50 Shakespeare St, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, England
[2] Univ Dundee, Sch Business, Econ, Nethergate, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
关键词
Cryptocurrencies; Sentiment; Machine learning; Volatility forecasting; G10; G14; G17; BITCOIN RETURNS; INVESTOR SENTIMENT; PRICE; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1007/s10690-024-09510-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The relationship between investor sentiment and cryptocurrency market volatility remains an area of growing interest in empirical finance. In this study, we present an innovative forecasting approach by utilizing a unique dataset of AI-generated sentiment from a comprehensive database of crypto market news. In a horserace fashion, we first evaluate the Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR) model and then compare its forecasting performance to five advanced machine learning (ML) methods. ML performs reasonably well and improves the accuracy of the benchmark HAR model. Interestingly, including sentiment does not improve the forecasting accuracy of the HAR model. However, our findings highlight that investor sentiment seems to influence crypto market volatility in a nonlinear fashion that can (only) be captured by ML methods. In other words, LightGBM, XGBoost, and LSTM models show enhanced predictive accuracy when sentiment data is incorporated, improving no-sentiment forecasts in 54.17% of the cases studied. Overall, our results emphasize the significant potential of integrating machine learning and sentiment analysis as a promising avenue for improved forecasting, offering potential benefits for risk management strategies and provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Forecasting Realized Volatility Based on Sentiment Index and GRU Model
    Gu, Wentao
    Zheng, Suhao
    Wang, Ru
    Dong, Cui
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATICS, 2020, 24 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [32] Which is the better forecasting model? A comparison between HAR-RV and multifractality volatility
    Ma, Feng
    Wei, Yu
    Huang, Dengshi
    Chen, Yixiang
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2014, 405 : 171 - 180
  • [33] Forecasting realized volatility of agricultural commodity futures with infinite Hidden Markov HAR models
    Luo, Jiawen
    Klein, Tony
    Ji, Qiang
    Hou, Chenghan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2022, 38 (01) : 51 - 73
  • [34] Forecasting Ethereum's volatility: an expansive approach using HAR models and structural breaks
    Chen, Ruijie
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [35] Forecasting volatility of the Chinese stock markets using TVP HAR-type models
    Liu, Guangqiang
    Wang, Yan
    Chen, Xiaodan
    Zhang, Yifeng
    Shang, Yue
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2020, 542
  • [36] Forecasting realized volatility: HAR against Principal Components Combining, neural networks and GARCH
    Vortelinos, Dimitrios I.
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2017, 39 : 824 - 839
  • [37] New energy vehicles sales forecasting using machine learning: The role of media sentiment
    Shao, Jin
    Hong, Jingke
    Wang, Meiping
    Wang, Xianzhu
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 201
  • [38] Realized Volatility Forecasting for Stocks and Futures Indices with Rolling CEEMDAN and Machine Learning Models
    Zhang, Yuetong
    Peng, Ying
    Song, Yuping
    COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [39] Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures using HAR-type models with structural breaks
    Wen, Fenghua
    Gong, Xu
    Cai, Shenghua
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 59 : 400 - 413
  • [40] The HAR-type models with leverage and structural breaks and their applications to the volatility forecasting of stock market
    Gong X.
    Cao J.
    Wen F.
    Yang X.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2020, 40 (05): : 1113 - 1133