Fentanyl versus nebulized ketamine for prehospital analgesia: A retrospective data review

被引:0
|
作者
Mcarthur, Robert [1 ]
Cash, Rebecca E. [2 ]
Anderso, Jordan [2 ]
de la Rosa, Xavier [2 ]
Peckne, Pandora [2 ]
Hogue, Dana [2 ]
Badawood, Lojain [1 ]
Secrist, Emily [1 ]
Andrabi, Sara [1 ]
Patrick, Casey [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Henry JN Taub Dept Emergency Med, 1504 Taub Loop, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Harris Cty Emergency Serv, Dist 11, Spring, TX USA
来源
关键词
Prehospital; Analgesia; Non-opioid; Ketamine; Breath-Actuated Nebulizer; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; INTRANASAL KETAMINE; PAIN MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.033
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of fentanyl and ketamine via Breath Actuated Nebulizer (BAN) for analgesia in the prehospital setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional evaluation of patients receiving fentanyl or ketamine via BAN for pain management in a large suburban EMS system between 3/1/2022 and 6/1/2023. The primary outcome was change in first to last pain score. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients with traumatic pain. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) to estimate the treatment effect of fentanyl vs ketamine via BAN among all patients and the subgroup of those with traumatic pain. Results: Of the total 1480 patients included, 1317 (89.0 %) received fentanyl and 163 (11.0 %) received ketamine via BAN. The unadjusted mean change in pain score was -2.9 (SD 3.0) for fentanyl and -3.5 (SD 3.4) for ketamine. In the propensity score analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in pain score change for the fentanyl group versus ketamine among all patients (mean difference, IPTW: -0.45, 95 %CI -1.18, 0.28; PSM: -0.36, 95 %CI -0.93, 0.21). Subgroup analysis of patients treated for traumatic pain showed a significant reduction in pain for patients treated with ketamine compared to fentanyl, indicating a higher degree of analgesia from ketamine for traumatic pain (unadjusted: -1.37, 95 % CI -2.20, -0.54; IPTW: -1.10, 95 % CI -1.96, -0.23; PSM: -0.92, 95% CI -1.17, -0.12). Conclusion: We found no statistically significant difference in the analgesic treatment effect for the overall fentanyl and ketamine groups. Subgroup analysis of patients treated for traumatic pain showed greater analgesia for ketamine via BAN over fentanyl. Given the ease of administration and lack of need for intravenous access, ketamine via BAN is a reasonable and effective choice for prehospital pain management. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 128
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Procedural Sedation and Analgesia Outcomes in Children After Discharge From the Emergency Department: Ketamine Versus Fentanyl/Midazolam
    McQueen, Alisa
    Wright, Robert O.
    Kido, Maya M.
    Kaye, Erica
    Krauss, Baruch
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 54 (02) : 191 - 197
  • [22] Subdissociative-dose Ketamine versus Fentanyl for Analgesia during Propofol Procedural Sedation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Messenger, David W.
    Murray, Heather E.
    Dungey, Paul E.
    van Vlymen, Janet
    Sivilotti, Marco L. A.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (10) : 877 - 886
  • [23] Efficacy and safety in ketamine-guided prehospital analgesia for abdominal pain
    Haeske, David
    Dorau, Wolfgang
    Heinemann, Niklas
    Eppler, Fabian
    Schopp, Tobias
    Schempf, Benjamin
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (08) : 2291 - 2297
  • [24] Efficacy and safety in ketamine-guided prehospital analgesia for abdominal pain
    David Häske
    Wolfgang Dorau
    Niklas Heinemann
    Fabian Eppler
    Tobias Schopp
    Benjamin Schempf
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2022, 17 : 2291 - 2297
  • [25] Prehospital procedural sedation and analgesia agent selection: propofol, etomidate, ketamine
    Yilmaz, Sarper
    Tatliparmak, Ali Cankut
    Ak, Rohat
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 32 (01):
  • [26] FENTANYL AND ALFENTANIL VERSUS MORPHINE FOR EPIDURAL ANALGESIA
    BLEDSOE, SW
    READY, LB
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (06) : 1024 - 1025
  • [27] Intravenous ketamine or fentanyl prolongs postoperative analgesia after intrathecal neostigmine
    Lauretti, GR
    Azevedo, VMS
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (04): : 766 - 770
  • [28] Propofol and ketamine versus fentanyl for open heart surgery
    Botero, CA
    Smith, CE
    Holbrook, C
    Pinchak, AC
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (04): : SC121 - SC121
  • [29] A randomized, double-blind study comparing morphine with fentanyl in prehospital analgesia
    Galinski, M
    Dolveck, F
    Borron, SW
    Tual, L
    Van Laer, V
    Lardeur, JY
    Lapostolle, F
    Adnet, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (02): : 114 - 119
  • [30] Prehospital analgesia using nasal administration of S-ketamine - a case series
    Johansson, Joakim
    Sjoberg, Jonas
    Nordgren, Marie
    Sandstrom, Erik
    Sjoberg, Folke
    Zetterstrom, Henrik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 21