Optimization of Large-scale Aeroengine Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing

被引:0
|
作者
Herzog, Dirk [1 ]
Maiwald, Maria I. [1 ]
Kelbassal, Ingomar [1 ]
Sharma, Ashish [2 ]
Markovic, Nick [3 ]
Manger, Philipp [3 ]
McGugan, Ailsa [3 ]
Harris, Andy [3 ]
Uffrecht, Wieland [4 ]
Lingner, Markus [5 ]
Becker, Malte [6 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Univ Technol, Inst Ind Smart Mat, D-21029 Hamburg, Germany
[2] GE Aerosp, Thermal Syst Adv Aviat Technol, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[3] Autodesk Ltd, Autodesk Res, London WC2N 4HN, England
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Mech Sci & Engn, Inst Engn Mech, Chair Magnetofluiddynam Measurement & Automat Tec, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[5] Fraunhofer IAPT, Proc Qualificat Dept, DED Grp, D-21029 Hamburg, Germany
[6] Fraunhofer IAPT, Proc Chain Automat Dept, Post Proc Grp, D-21029 Hamburg, Germany
来源
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Additive Manufacturing (AM) presents a ground-breaking opportunity to produce lightweight parts with enhanced functionality and design flexibility. It revolutionizes assembly by enabling integrated designs that significantly reduce component counts, minimizing assembly efforts and potential faults. Consequently, AM stands out as an appealing choice for manufacturing aerospace engine parts. Among AM techniques for metal parts, Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF), also known as Direct Metal Laser Melting (DMLM), currently dominates the industry due to its capability to achieve high part quality and density using advanced machinery. However, limitations in part size stem from the build envelopes of these machines. Hence, this study explores the feasibility of printing large-scale engine parts, covering the design process, additive manufacturing, and aerothermal testing. A turbine center frame, nearly one meter in diameter, serves as a demonstrator case. Employing a multi-objective Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) approach, the frame's structure underwent optimization through generative design, aiming to minimize mass, maximize stiffness, and meet strength requirements. Furthermore, the manifold section of the frame was optimized to reduce system pressure loss within the designated design space. Inconel 718 using LPBF was selected, with initial segments confirming manufacturability. The manufacturing process was fine-tuned for productivity and part properties, establishing design guidelines accordingly. Subsequently, the optimized manifold design underwent successful aerothermal testing on a specific test rig under various flow conditions. The redesigned frame showcased a 34% weight reduction and a 91% decrease in pressure loss while consolidating over 100 parts into one assembly. For the production, two alternatives are discussed. On the one hand, the final design was printed using the GE Additive ATLAS, the largest available LPBF system, validating the AM feasibility for large-scale parts under controlled laboratory conditions. On the other hand, a modified design is proposed that allows for the printing of segments on a regular-sized AM machine and a subsequent welding.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thermal analysis of additive manufacturing of large-scale thermoplastic polymer composites
    Compton, Brett G.
    Post, Brian K.
    Duty, Chad E.
    Love, Lonnie
    Kunc, Vlastimil
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2017, 17 : 77 - 86
  • [22] Large-scale additive manufacturing tooling for extrusion-compression molds
    Yeole, Pritesh
    Kim, Seokpum
    Hassen, Ahmed Arabi
    Kumar, Vipin
    Kunc, Vlastimil
    Vaidya, Uday
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2021, 1
  • [23] LARGE-SCALE EQUIPMENT AND HIGHER PERFORMANCE MATERIALS FOR LASER ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Shi, Yusheng
    Yan, Chunze
    Wei, Qingsong
    Zhang, Lichao
    Wen, Shifeng
    Zhao, Xiao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2014, : 256 - 269
  • [24] Mitigation of distortion in large additive manufacturing parts
    Denlinger, Erik R.
    Michaleris, Pan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2017, 231 (06) : 983 - 993
  • [25] Thermomechanical Modeling of Additive Manufacturing Large Parts
    Denlinger, Erik R.
    Irwin, Jeff
    Michaleris, Pan
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (06):
  • [26] TEMPERATURE EVALUATION AND BONDING QUALITY OF LARGE SCALE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING THIN WALL PARTS
    Eyercioglu, Omer
    Aladag, Mehmet
    Sever, Samet
    SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2018, 36 (03): : 645 - 654
  • [27] Allocation and scheduling of deposition paths in a layer for multi-robot coordinated wire and arc additive manufacturing of large-scale parts
    Li, Yongzhe
    Meng, Lingyi
    Li, Minglang
    Zhou, Yijun
    Liu, Xiaochao
    Li, Xinlei
    Zhang, Guangjun
    VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [28] Knowledge management with additive manufacturing – a basic approach to manage knowledge about additive manufacturing technologies in large-scale enterprises
    Burkhart, Mathias
    Aurich, Jan C.
    ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 2015, 110 (06): : 327 - 330
  • [29] PROPOSALS FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF PIECES PRODUCED BY ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Garcia-Dominguez, Amabel
    Claver-Gil, Juan
    Angel Sebastian-Perez, Miguel
    DYNA, 2018, 93 (03):
  • [30] Defect Identification and Mitigation Via Visual Inspection in Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing
    Borish, Michael
    Post, Brian K.
    Roschli, Alex
    Chesser, Phillip C.
    Love, Lonnie J.
    Gaul, Katherine T.
    JOM, 2019, 71 (03) : 893 - 899