Systematic treatment in gastric cancer patients with overt bleeding: A propensity score matching analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Yao, Yan-Hong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hua [3 ]
Xiao, Yu [1 ]
Liu, Zhen-Tao [1 ]
Shi, Yan-Yan
Yu, Jin-Yu [1 ]
Li, Qian [1 ]
Cao, Bao-Shan [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Med Oncol & Radiat Sickness, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Canc Ctr, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Res Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
Gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer; Overt bleeding; Risk factors; Systematic treatment; Overall survival; DCF REGIMENS; OUTCOMES; CHEMOTHERAPY; HEMORRHAGE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1177
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Hemorrhage, which is not a rare complication in patients with gastric cancer (GC)/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC), can lead to a poor prognosis. However, no study has examined the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy as an initial therapy for GC/GEJC patients with overt bleeding (OB). AIM To investigate the impact of OB on the survival and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of GC/GEJC patients. METHODS Patients with advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC who received systematic treatment at Peking University Third Hospital were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. RESULTS After 1:2 PSM analysis, 93 patients were assessed, including 32 patients with OB before treatment (OBBT) and 61 patients without OBBT. The disease control rate was 90.6% in the group with OBBT and 88.5% in the group without OBBT, and this difference was not statistically significant. There was no difference in the incidence of TRAEs between the group with OBBT and the group without OBBT. The median overall survival (mOS) was 15.2 months for patients with OBBT and 23.7 months for those without OBBT [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.101, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.672-1.804, log rank P = 0.701]. The mOS was worse for patients with OB after treatment (OBAT) than for those without OBAT (11.4 months vs 23.7 months, HR = 1.787, 95%CI: 1.006-3.175, log rank P = 0.044). CONCLUSION The mOS for GC/GEJC patients with OBBT was similar to that for those without OBBT, but the mOS for patients with OBAT was worse than that for those without OBAT.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal Timing for Postsurgical Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study
    Huang, Shih-Ming
    Chen, Yen-Chao
    Chen, Wan-Yu
    Yang, Lan-Yan
    Tsan, Din-Li
    Tsang, Ngan-Ming
    Yap, Wing-Keen
    Tsai, Chien-Sheng
    Leung, Wai-Man
    Hong, Ji-Hong
    Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh
    Yeh, Ta-Sen
    Wu, Tsung-Han
    Chen, Yi-Chan
    Lin, Yun-Hsuan
    Huang, Bing-Shen
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 10 (02): : 332 - 340
  • [22] Robotic gastrectomy was reliable option for overweight patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study
    Wei, Ling-Hua
    Zheng, Hua-Long
    Xue, Zhen
    Xu, Bin-Bin
    Zheng, Hong-Hong
    Shen, Li-Li
    Zheng, Zhi-Wei
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Li, Ping
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (06): : 3156 - 3166
  • [23] The Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapies for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study
    Wang, Tongbo
    Chen, Yingtai
    Zhao, Lulu
    Zhou, Hong
    Wu, Chaorui
    Zhang, Xiaojie
    Zhou, Aiping
    Jin, Jing
    Zhao, Dongbing
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 12 (02): : 379 - 386
  • [24] PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS UPFRONT SURGERY FOR ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS
    Hong, Stefany
    Pereira, Marina Alessandra
    Victor, Carolina Ribeiro
    Gregorio, Joao Vitor Antunes
    Zilberstein, Bruno
    Ribeiro Junior, Ulysses
    D'Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro
    Ramos, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (01):
  • [25] Comparison of totally robotic and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Zheng, Yi-ming
    Luo, Zi-yan
    Li, Zheng-yan
    Liu, Jia-jia
    Ren, Zhi-xiang
    Wang, Jun-jie
    Yu, Pei-wu
    Shi, Yan
    Zhao, Yong-liang
    Qian, Feng
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (08): : 4476 - 4484
  • [26] Colorectal Post-polypectomy Bleeding in Outpatient versus Inpatient Treatment: Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Maeda, Takato
    Sakuraba, Hirotake
    Oyama, Takao
    Nakagawa, Satoru
    Ota, Shinji
    Murai, Yasuhisa
    Machida, Ryuma
    Ishidoya, Nao
    Kikuchi, Hidezumi
    Chinda, Daisuke
    Sakamoto, Juichi
    Iwamura, Hideki
    JOURNAL OF THE ANUS RECTUM AND COLON, 2024, 8 (03) : 204 - 211
  • [27] Benefit of laparoscopic compared to standard open gastric cancer surgery for sarcopenic patients: a propensity score-matching analysis
    Tsuneyuki Uchida
    Ryuichi Sekine
    Kenichi Matsuo
    Gaku Kigawa
    Takahiro Umemoto
    Kuniya Tanaka
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 9244 - 9253
  • [28] Advantages of Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients Aged Over 80 Years: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Ryo Tanaka
    Sang-Woong Lee
    Yoshiro Imai
    Kotaro Honda
    Kentaro Matsuo
    Keitaro Tashiro
    Masaru Kawai
    Kazuhisa Uchiyama
    World Journal of Surgery, 2021, 45 : 2830 - 2839
  • [29] Advantages of Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients Aged Over 80 Years: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Tanaka, Ryo
    Lee, Sang-Woong
    Imai, Yoshiro
    Honda, Kotaro
    Matsuo, Kentaro
    Tashiro, Keitaro
    Kawai, Masaru
    Uchiyama, Kazuhisa
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 45 (09) : 2830 - 2839
  • [30] Benefit of laparoscopic compared to standard open gastric cancer surgery for sarcopenic patients: a propensity score-matching analysis
    Uchida, Tsuneyuki
    Sekine, Ryuichi
    Matsuo, Kenichi
    Kigawa, Gaku
    Umemoto, Takahiro
    Tanaka, Kuniya
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (12): : 9244 - 9253