Methylation Biomarkers of Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dolcini, Jacopo [1 ]
Chiavarini, Manuela [2 ]
Firmani, Giorgio [1 ]
Brennan, Kasey J. M. [3 ]
Cardenas, Andres [4 ]
Baccarelli, Andrea A. [3 ]
Barbadoro, Pamela [1 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Marche Reg, Dept Biomed Sci & Publ Hlth, Sect Hyg Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Hlth Sci, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
关键词
lung cancer; DNA methylation; blood; meta-analysis; systematic review; epigenetic age; public health; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENETIC AGE; DOSE-RESPONSE; MORTALITY; BREAST; ACCELERATION; PATTERNS; MARKER; SEX;
D O I
10.3390/cancers17040690
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide among both men and women, and represents a major public health challenge. DNA methylation (DNAm) has shown potential in identifying individuals at higher risk of LC, but the overall evidence has not been systematically evaluated. This review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate and summarize existing research on the association between blood DNAm levels and LC risk. Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published until February 2024, following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria. Results: Using a random effects model, our pooled analysis showed a significant association between increased DNAm levels and LC risk (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.39; I2 = 93.90%, p = 0.0001). Stratifying the results by study design showed a stronger association in two prospective cohort studies (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.36-1.90; I2 = 14.42%, p = 0.32), while case-control studies showed a weaker association (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.11; I2 = 70.57%, p = 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses indicated that omitting individual studies did not significantly alter the LC risk estimates. Conclusions: These findings suggest that higher blood DNAm levels are associated with an increased risk of LC, especially in long-term cohort studies. Further research is recommended to explore the potential of DNAm as a screening biomarker for LC and to clarify the role of other influencing factors.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Occupational Physical Activity and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Benny Rana
    Liang Hu
    Andrew Harper
    Chao Cao
    Cheryl Peters
    Darren Brenner
    Lin Yang
    Sports Medicine, 2020, 50 : 1637 - 1651
  • [22] Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and risk of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kwak, Kyeongmin
    Paek, Domyung
    Park, Jong-Tae
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2020, 63 (04) : 312 - 327
  • [23] Blood Biomarkers and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Roy, Danielle Carole
    Wang, Tzu-Fei
    Lun, Ronda
    Zharai, Amin
    Mallick, Ranjeeta
    Burger, Dylan
    Zitikyte, Gabriele
    Hawken, Steven
    Wells, Philip Stephen
    BLOOD, 2023, 142
  • [24] HPV and lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Karnosky, Julia
    Dietmaier, Wolfgang
    Knuettel, Helge
    Freigang, Viola
    Koch, Myriam
    Koll, Franziska
    Zeman, Florian
    Schulz, Christian
    CANCER REPORTS, 2021, 4 (04)
  • [25] Screening for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ali, Muhammad Usman
    Miller, John
    Peirson, Leslea
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna
    Kenny, Meghan
    Sherifali, Diana
    Raina, Parminder
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 89 : 301 - 314
  • [26] Association between family history of lung cancer and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ang, Lina
    Chan, Cheryl Pui Yi
    Yau, Wai-Ping
    Seow, Wei Jie
    LUNG CANCER, 2020, 148 : 129 - 137
  • [27] Prognostic Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Coll-de la Rubia, Eva
    Martinez-Garcia, Elena
    Dittmar, Gunnar
    Gil-Moreno, Antonio
    Cabrera, Silvia
    Colas, Eva
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (06) : 1 - 20
  • [28] Head and neck cancer biomarkers: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marakala, Vijaya
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2023, 542
  • [29] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic effectiveness of human papillomavirus methylation biomarkers for detection of cervical cancer
    Hillyar, Christopher Rt
    Kanabar, Shivani S.
    Pufal, Kamil R.
    Lawson, Alexander W.
    Hee, Joshua Li Saw
    Rallis, Kathrine S.
    Nibber, Anjan
    Sideris, Michail
    EPIGENOMICS, 2022, 14 (18) : 1055 - 1072
  • [30] Association between previous lung diseases and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ang, Lina
    Ghosh, Pratyusha
    Seow, Wei Jie
    CARCINOGENESIS, 2021, 42 (12) : 1461 - 1474