Evaluation of six latest precipitation datasets for extreme precipitation estimates and hydrological application across various climate regions in China

被引:0
|
作者
Wan, Yongjing [1 ]
Li, Daiyuan [2 ]
Sun, Jingjing [3 ]
Wang, Mingming [1 ]
Liu, Han [4 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Maanshan 243002, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Hydraul Res Inst, Hydrol & Water Resources Dept, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[3] Water Resources Res Inst Shandong Prov, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn Sc, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
关键词
Global precipitation datasets; Performance evaluation; Hydrological modeling; Extreme precipitation; Extreme streamflow; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; GAUGE; PERFORMANCE; PRODUCTS; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY; IMPROVEMENT; SATELLITE; ENSEMBLE; METRICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.107932
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets is crucial for enhancing precipitation accuracy and supporting its applications. This study comprehensively evaluated the performances of six widely used long-term precipitation datasets in capturing extreme precipitation and streamflow over China using two hydrological models. These datasets include one satellite-reanalysis-gauge dataset (MSWEP V2), two gauged-based datasets (GPCC and CPC), and three reanalysis datasets (NECP-2, MERRA-2, and ERA5). The evaluation was performed at a daily timescale for the period 1982-2020. Compared with the rain gauge observations, GPCC provides the best performance in extreme precipitation estimation, followed by MSWEPV2, CPC, and MERRA-2. All precipitation datasets tend to underestimate annual maximum 1-day precipitation (Rx1) and annual maximum consecutive 5day precipitation (RX5), while they overestimate the extremely wet days (R95p) in dry northwestern China and underestimate it in wet southeastern China. Integrating gauge data into gridded precipitation datasets enhances the accuracy of extreme precipitation measurements. For streamflow simulation, GPCC shows the best performances across most catchments regarding hydrological calibration score (Kling-Gupta efficiency, KGE), except in arid northwestern China, where MSWEP V2 performed best. The ability of precipitation datasets to capture extreme streamflow is associated with considerable uncertainties, depending on the hydrological model used, and no single dataset consistently outperforms others. Besides, the influence of hydrological model selection in streamflow simulations is more significant in dry and high-latitude mountainous regions than in wet and low- latitude regions. This study provides significant insights into the reliability of the latest precipitation datasets and their applications in hydrological modeling, which is expected to serve as a reference for utilizing these datasets.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Evaluation of hydrological response to extreme climate variability using SWAT model: application to the Fuhe basin of Poyang Lake watershed, China
    Lu, Jianzhong
    Cui, Xiaolin
    Chen, Xiaoling
    Sauvage, Sabine
    Perez, Jose-Miguel Sanchez
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 48 (06): : 1730 - 1744
  • [32] Accuracy evaluation of GPM multi-satellite precipitation products in the hydrological application over alpine and gorge regions with sparse rain gauge network
    Chen, Jiachao
    Wang, Zhaoli
    Wu, Xushu
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Lai, Chengguang
    Zeng, Zhaoyang
    Li, Jun
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 50 (06): : 1710 - 1729
  • [33] Comparison of on-site versus NOAA's extreme precipitation intensity-duration-frequency estimates for six forest headwater catchments across the continental United States
    Mukherjee, Sourav
    Amatya, Devendra M. M.
    Jalowska, Anna M. M.
    Campbell, John L. L.
    Johnson, Sherri L. L.
    Elder, Kelly
    Panda, Sudhanshu
    Grace, Johnny M. M.
    Kikoyo, Duncan
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023, 37 (10) : 4051 - 4070
  • [34] Comparison of on-site versus NOAA’s extreme precipitation intensity-duration-frequency estimates for six forest headwater catchments across the continental United States
    Sourav Mukherjee
    Devendra M. Amatya
    Anna M. Jalowska
    John L. Campbell
    Sherri L. Johnson
    Kelly Elder
    Sudhanshu Panda
    Johnny M. Grace
    Duncan Kikoyo
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2023, 37 : 4051 - 4070
  • [35] Evaluation of Multi-Satellite Precipitation Products and Their Ability in Capturing the Characteristics of Extreme Climate Events over the Yangtze River Basin, China
    Xiao, Shuai
    Xia, Jun
    Zou, Lei
    WATER, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [36] Evaluation of multi-satellite precipitation products and their ability in capturing the characteristics of extreme climate events over the Yangtze River Basin, China
    Xiao S.
    Xia J.
    Zou L.
    Water (Switzerland), 2020, 12 (04):
  • [37] Evaluation of extreme precipitation in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China using a 1.5 km mesh convection‑permitting regional climate model
    Guangtao Dong
    Zhiyu Jiang
    Ya Wang
    Zhan Tian
    Junguo Liu
    Climate Dynamics, 2022, 59 : 2257 - 2273
  • [38] Evaluation of six equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimating using public weather forecast message for different climate regions across China
    Yang, Yang
    Luo, Yufeng
    Wu, Conglin
    Zheng, Hezhen
    Zhang, Lei
    Cui, Yuanlai
    Sun, Ningning
    Wang, Li
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 222 : 386 - 399
  • [39] Evaluation of extreme precipitation in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China using a 1.5 km mesh convection-permitting regional climate model
    Dong, Guangtao
    Jiang, Zhiyu
    Wang, Ya
    Tian, Zhan
    Liu, Junguo
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2022, 59 (7-8) : 2257 - 2273
  • [40] Evaluation of the performance of the Beijing Climate Centre Climate System Model 1.1(m) to simulate precipitation across China based on long-range correlation characteristics
    Zhao, Shanshan
    He, Wenping
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2015, 120 (24) : 12576 - 12588