EMMY trial: What we know and what we need to know

被引:0
|
作者
Jaiswal, Arvind [1 ]
Chaurasia, Swati [2 ]
Pradhan, Akshyaya [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Eras Med Coll & Univ, Dept Physiol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Pulm Med, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Empagliflozin; heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction; NT pro-BNP; HEART-FAILURE;
D O I
10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_361_24
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
SGLT-2 inhibitors are a class of antidiabetic drugs with additional cardiovascular benefits. Though initially developed for glycemic control, subsequent studies in the heart failure (HF) population also demonstrated positive outcomes. Currently, they are approved for use in HF with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction. More recently, encouraging data have emerged on acute HF. Following an episode of acute myocardial infarction, patients are also at high risk for developing HF and experiencing recurrent events despite optimal therapy. The PARADISE MI study failed to demonstrate any benefits of ARNI in this scenario. The EMMY trial explored the role of SGLT-2i in >450 odds patients with acute MI. At 26 weeks SGLT-2i (empagliflozin) use led to a higher fall in NT-pro-BNP levels compared to standard treatment. There was additional improvement in left ventricular echocardiographic parameters with empagliflozin too. However, it was a small trial, had a short follow-up and there were no clinical endpoints. But none the least, it attested to the safety of SGLT-2i in the post-MI scenario. Because the primary care physician frequently encounters patients in the post-MI scenario, the manuscript provides insights into their practice. Based on contemporary evidence, the universal use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients following acute MI is not warranted. A further role of these drugs in post-MI HF will be clarified in ongoing trials.
引用
收藏
页码:4145 / 4148
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: What we know, what we think we know, and what we need to know
    Dhawan, Rahul
    Gundry, Rebekah L.
    Brett-Major, David M.
    Mahr, Claudius
    Thiele, Geoffrey M.
    Lindsey, Merry L.
    Anderson, Daniel R.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 144 : 12 - 14
  • [42] OXIDATION OF CARBON: WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE STILL NEED TO KNOW
    Senneca, Osvalda
    INFUB - 11TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL FURNACES AND BOILERS (INFUB-11), 2017, 120 : 62 - 74
  • [43] Healthy workplaces: what we know and what else we need to know
    Jensen, Per Anker
    van der Voordt, Theo J. M.
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE REAL ESTATE, 2019, 22 (02) : 95 - 112
  • [44] Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Singh, Anisha
    Alexander, Patricia A.
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2022, 34 (02) : 677 - 715
  • [45] Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Surawicz, Christina M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 162 (09) : 662 - 663
  • [46] Forecasting support systems: What we know, what we need to know
    Fildes, Robert
    Goodwin, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2013, 29 (02) : 290 - 294
  • [47] RESEARCH IN CANCER PAIN - WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW
    CLEELAND, C
    CANCER, 1991, 67 (03) : 823 - 827
  • [48] Quercetin and iron metabolism: What we know and what we need to know
    Xiao, Lin
    Luo, Gang
    Tang, Yuhan
    Yao, Ping
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 114 : 190 - 203
  • [49] THE POWER OF BLENDED LEARNING: WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW
    Terbeek, Luuk
    Cremer, Marjolein
    van Klaveren, Chris
    13TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2019), 2019, : 2459 - 2469
  • [50] Screening for ovarian cancer: What we know, what we need to know
    Hensley, ML
    Castiel, M
    Robson, ME
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2000, 14 (11): : 1601 - 1607