EMMY trial: What we know and what we need to know

被引:0
|
作者
Jaiswal, Arvind [1 ]
Chaurasia, Swati [2 ]
Pradhan, Akshyaya [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Eras Med Coll & Univ, Dept Physiol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Pulm Med, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Empagliflozin; heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction; NT pro-BNP; HEART-FAILURE;
D O I
10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_361_24
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
SGLT-2 inhibitors are a class of antidiabetic drugs with additional cardiovascular benefits. Though initially developed for glycemic control, subsequent studies in the heart failure (HF) population also demonstrated positive outcomes. Currently, they are approved for use in HF with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction. More recently, encouraging data have emerged on acute HF. Following an episode of acute myocardial infarction, patients are also at high risk for developing HF and experiencing recurrent events despite optimal therapy. The PARADISE MI study failed to demonstrate any benefits of ARNI in this scenario. The EMMY trial explored the role of SGLT-2i in >450 odds patients with acute MI. At 26 weeks SGLT-2i (empagliflozin) use led to a higher fall in NT-pro-BNP levels compared to standard treatment. There was additional improvement in left ventricular echocardiographic parameters with empagliflozin too. However, it was a small trial, had a short follow-up and there were no clinical endpoints. But none the least, it attested to the safety of SGLT-2i in the post-MI scenario. Because the primary care physician frequently encounters patients in the post-MI scenario, the manuscript provides insights into their practice. Based on contemporary evidence, the universal use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients following acute MI is not warranted. A further role of these drugs in post-MI HF will be clarified in ongoing trials.
引用
收藏
页码:4145 / 4148
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What we know, what we don't know and what we need to know
    Chapple, Christopher R.
    MacNeil, Sheila
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2019, 29 (04) : 378 - 379
  • [2] Diversity: What We Know, What We Need to Know, and What We Need to Do
    Dukes, Charles
    Lamar-Dukes, Pamela
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2009, 34 (3-4) : 71 - 75
  • [3] Re: What we Know, What we Don't Know and What we Need to Know
    Wein, Alan J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (06): : 1068 - 1068
  • [4] Political Simulations: What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Still Need to Know
    Baranowski, Michael K.
    Weir, Kimberly A.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 11 (04) : 391 - 403
  • [5] Bronchial thermoplasty: what we know, what we don't know, and what we need to know
    Russell, Richard J.
    Brightling, Christopher E.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 59 (01)
  • [6] Syphilis and blood donors: What we know, what we do not know, and what we need to know
    Orton, S
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2001, 15 (04) : 282 - 291
  • [7] Population and consumption - What we know, what we need to know
    Kates, RW
    ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 42 (03): : 10 - 19
  • [8] Outcomes in CKD: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Clark, Laura E.
    Khan, Izhar
    NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 114 (02): : C95 - C102
  • [9] Trust in maps: what we know and what we need to know
    Prestby, Timothy J.
    CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2025, 52 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [10] Youth Violence: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Bushman, Brad J.
    Newman, Katherine
    Calvert, Sandra L.
    Downey, Geraldine
    Dredze, Mark
    Gottfredson, Michael
    Jablonski, Nina G.
    Masten, Ann S.
    Morrill, Calvin
    Neill, Daniel B.
    Romer, Daniel
    Webster, Daniel W.
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 71 (01) : 17 - 39