Comparison of Outpatient Mechanical Cervical Ripening Methods to Standard Inpatient Ripening

被引:0
|
作者
Goering, Mary P. [1 ]
Wunderlich, Whitney L. [2 ]
Vacquier, Marc C. [2 ]
Watson, David A. [3 ]
Drake, Kelly A. [4 ]
Hoffman, Sandra I. [4 ]
Schulte, Anna [2 ]
Colicchia, Laura C. [5 ]
Sidebottom, Abbey C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Allina Hlth, United Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Allina Hlth, Care Delivery Res, Minneapolis, MN 55402 USA
[3] Childrens Minnesota, Childrens Minnesota Res Inst, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Allina Hlth, Abbott Northwestern Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Allina Hlth, Minnesota Perinatal Phys, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
cervical ripening; induction; Foley balloon; osmotic dilator; outpatient; Dilapan-S; FOLEY CATHETER; LABOR INDUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1055/a-2553-9258
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to assess clinical efficiency and maternal and neonatal outcomes for patients who underwent outpatient cervical ripening using mechanical methods (osmotic dilators and Foley balloon) compared with patients who underwent inpatient ripening. Study Design A retrospective cohort study from March 2020 to March 2022 compared patients with low-risk, term, singleton pregnancies who underwent outpatient cervical ripening to clinically similar patients who had inpatient ripening. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for analysis of outcomes to account for differences in groups and comparisons of outcomes are reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The cohort included 391 patients (116 outpatient, 275 inpatient). Among the outpatient group, half used only mechanical devices, and all others received additional pharmacological methods after admission for labor induction. Among the inpatient group, the most common cervical ripening method was pharmacological only (66.2%), followed by both pharmacological and mechanical (25.8%), and 8% used only mechanical. After outpatient cervical ripening, patients had significantly higher cervical dilation (mean difference 1.9 cm, 95% CI: 1.6, 2.3) and simplified bishop scores (mean difference 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.1) on admission compared with the inpatient group. The average time from admission to delivery was 5.8 hours shorter (95% CI: -8.6, -2.9) for the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group, and the average total length of stay was 7.1 hours shorter (95% CI: -12.1, -2.1) for the outpatients among patients with vaginal deliveries. Both groups had similar hours of oxytocin use, and mode of delivery, and did not differ for maternal complications or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion Outpatient cervical ripening using multiple mechanical methods was associated with significantly higher cervical dilation, shorter average time from patient admission to delivery, and shorter total length of stay for vaginal deliveries. Outpatient cervical ripening may be an important option for easing resource utilization for induced labor.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MECHANICAL METHODS OF CERVICAL RIPENING
    KRAMMER, J
    OBRIEN, WF
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 38 (02): : 280 - 286
  • [2] Comparison of outpatient with inpatient mifepristone usage for cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial
    Baev, O.
    Karapetian, A.
    Babich, D.
    Sukhikh, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2023, 18
  • [3] OUTPATIENT CERVICAL RIPENING
    SAWAI, SK
    OBRIEN, WF
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 38 (02): : 301 - 309
  • [4] Outpatient cervical ripening
    Amorosa, Jennifer M. H.
    Stone, Joanne L.
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 488 - 494
  • [5] Medical and mechanical methods for cervical ripening
    Biron-Shental, T
    Fishman, A
    Fejgin, MD
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 85 (02) : 159 - 160
  • [6] Outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening in obese parous women
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Blanchard, Christina T.
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S437 - S437
  • [7] A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Wilkinson, Chris
    Adelson, Pamela
    Turnbull, Deborah
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [8] A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Chris Wilkinson
    Pamela Adelson
    Deborah Turnbull
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15
  • [9] Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening at term - Comparison of outpatient vs. inpatient administration
    Chang, DW
    Velazquez, MD
    Colyer, M
    Klaus, P
    Mallipeddi, SK
    Rayburn, WE
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 50 (10) : 735 - 739
  • [10] Cervical Ripening in the Outpatient Setting
    Rogers, Tyler S.
    Lampe, Ben
    Skelly, Stephanie
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2022, 105 (02) : 193 - 195