Occlusal and Cephalometric Outcomes of Cleft Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:0
|
作者
Stonehouse-Smith, Daniel [1 ]
Abd Rahman, Aida N. A. [2 ]
Beale, Victoria [3 ]
Bellardie, Haydn [4 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Ctr Craniofacial & Regenerat Biol, London, England
[2] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Dent, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Royal Manchester Childrens Hosp, North West England, Isle Man & North Wales Cleft Network, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Western Cape, Fac Dent, Cape Town, South Africa
来源
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cleft; occlusion; orthodontics; orthognathic surgery; LE-FORT-I; MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT; LIP; PALATE; OSTEOTOMY; NEED; EUROCLEFT; STANDARD; CHILDREN; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.70019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesAberrant facial growth in individuals affected by orofacial clefts can result in maxillary retrusion and class III malocclusion, with a proportion requiring surgical correction at cessation of growth. This study aimed to evaluate occlusal and cephalometric outcomes of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.Material and MethodsRetrospective cohort study in a United Kingdom cleft center. Participants included twenty-seven patients (20 males, 7 females) with cleft (n = 16 UCLP :7 BCLP :4 ICP) who consecutively underwent combined surgical treatment for Class III malocclusion between January 2013 and December 2017. Records were collected pre-treatment (T0), pre-surgery (T1) and at debond (T2). Models were scored using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and cephalometric radiographs were traced and analyzed. Outcomes were assessed by an independent rater.ResultsMean age at surgery was 21.4 years (SD 4.9). Le Fort 1 advancement (mean 6.1 mm, SD 4.0) was performed in all cases. Additional procedures included mandibular setback (n = 2), cortico-cancellous bone grafting (n = 6) and genioplasty (n = 1). Mean T0 PAR score was 44.8 (SD 11.7), reducing to 3.6 (SD 2.0) at T2, indicating a mean % PAR score reduction of 91.6% (SD 4.7). Class III skeletal profiles improved from a mean T0 ANB of -2.1 degrees (SD 2.2), to 2.8 degrees (SD 1.6) at T2. Mean T0 overjet was -3.3 mm (SD 2.3), increasing to 2.6 mm (SD 1.3) at T2.ConclusionCleft orthognathic surgery differs in complexity and approach to routine orthognathics, however, these results demonstrate that occlusal outcomes can still be comparable with non-cleft populations. Outcome data can be used for comparison with other centers providing cleft orthognathic treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Variation among cleft centres in the use of secondary surgery for children with cleft palate: a retrospective cohort study
    Sitzman, Thomas J.
    Hossain, Monir
    Carle, Adam C.
    Heaton, Pamela C.
    Britto, Maria T.
    BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2017, 1 (01)
  • [22] A comparison of craniofacial cephalometric morphology and the later need for orthognathic surgery in 6-year-old cleft children
    Heliovaara, Arja
    Rautio, Jorma
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 39 (03) : 173 - 176
  • [23] Outcomes of Maxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Literature Review
    Tulika Ganoo
    Mats Sjöström
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2019, 18 : 500 - 508
  • [24] Cephalometric for Orthognathic Surgery (COGS) Analysis for Saudi Population
    Siddika, Ayesha
    Ab Rahman, Shaifulizan
    Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2021, 21
  • [25] Outcomes of Maxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Literature Review
    Ganoo, Tulika
    Sjostrom, Mats
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2019, 18 (04): : 500 - 508
  • [26] A study to evaluate cephalometric hard tissue profile of Tamil population for orthognathic surgery
    Nachiappan, S.
    Tharanikumar, S.
    Chandran, Ajay
    Anusudha, P.
    Nandini, G. D.
    Balasubramaniam, Murali
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2015, 7 (06): : 680 - 686
  • [27] Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery for North Indian population
    Singh, Satinder Pal
    Utreja, Ashok Kumar
    Jena, Ashok Kumar
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2013, 4 (04) : 460 - 466
  • [28] Computerized Cephalometric Study of the Pharyngeal Airway Space in Patients Submitted to Orthognathic Surgery
    Gonçales E.S.
    Rocha J.F.
    Gonçales A.G.B.
    Yaedú R.Y.F.
    Sant’Ana E.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2014, 13 (3) : 253 - 258
  • [29] Soft Tissue Cephalometric Norms for Orthognathic and Cosmetic Surgery
    Maria Shindoi, Jose
    Matsumoto, Yoshiro
    Sato, Yutaka
    Ono, Takashi
    Harada, Kiyoshi
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 71 (01) : E24 - E30
  • [30] EVALUATION OF MCNAMARA CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY PATIENTS
    BIGELOW, WC
    WITKOWSKI, CE
    CHASE, DC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1984, 63 : 220 - 220