Analyzing the Environmental Impacts and Empirical Limitations of Green Remodeling with Life Cycle Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jaemoon [1 ]
Ko, Wonkyeong [1 ]
Kim, Jaehee [1 ]
Byun, Jiyeon [1 ]
Nam, Seonghoon [1 ]
Jeong, Subin [2 ]
机构
[1] SAMOOCM Architect & Engineers, Technol Res Inst, Seoul 05556, South Korea
[2] Kongju Natl Univ, Grad Sch Energy Syst Engn, Dept Green Smart Architectural Engn, Gongju Si 32588, South Korea
关键词
green remodeling (GR); embodied carbon (EC); environmental impacts (EIs); building-LCA; GR-LCA; EPD materials; EMISSIONS; RETROFIT; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.3390/buildings15050783
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Government of Korea uses green remodeling (GR) as a central policy for achieving carbon neutrality in the building sector. However, despite GR's energy-saving benefits, it raises embodied carbon (EC) due to the incorporation of new materials, and there is a lack of impact analysis and assessment research. Thus, this study established the GR-LCA methodology to evaluate the environmental impacts (EIs) of GR, including EC. The methodology disaggregated and assessed the effects of EC and energy on GR in terms of GR's proportion of EC, six EI categories, and the carbon reduction impacts. The analysis revealed that GR's EC accounted for 10.6%, reducing to 9.89% when EPD materials were used. In terms of the reduction impact across six EIs, GWP was reduced to 0.84 and EP to 0.96. However, ODP, ADP, AP, and POCP, all elevated by high EIs from material inputs, increased to 626.7, 1.04, 1.16, and 250.09, respectively. Ultimately, the carbon reduction in GR was 24.9% when considering only energy usage, and 16.1% when including EC. When EPD materials were applied, the efficiency of reduction improved by an additional 0.6%, indicating a minimal application effect. Based on these findings, the differences in GR's EC compared to new constructions, reduction limitations, and potential improvements were discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How does Life Cycle Assessment capture the environmental impacts of A review
    Quevedo-Cascante, Monica
    Mogensen, Lisbeth
    Kongsted, Anne Grete
    Knudsen, Marie Trydeman
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 890
  • [32] A life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of cattle feedlot finishing rations
    Samantha J. Werth
    Alice S. Rocha
    James W. Oltjen
    Ermias Kebreab
    Frank M. Mitloehner
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1779 - 1793
  • [33] Environmental impacts of solar grade polysilicon based on life cycle assessment
    Xie, Minghui
    Ruan, Jiuli
    Bai, Lu
    Qiao, Qi
    Liu, Xiuqiong
    Yang, Deren
    Yang, Lifei
    2015, 28 (02): : 291 - 296
  • [34] ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF WIND ENERGY INSTALLATIONS DURING THEIR LIFE CYCLE
    Boyko, T. H.
    Ruda, M. V.
    UKRAINIAN METROLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2020, (3A): : 67 - 71
  • [35] Environmental life cycle assessment and social impacts of bioethanol production in Thailand
    Papong, Seksan
    Rewlay-ngoen, Chantima
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    Malakul, Pomthong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 : 254 - 266
  • [36] Integrating Protein Quality and Quantity with Environmental Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment
    Berardy, Andrew
    Johnston, Carol S.
    Plukis, Alexandra
    Vizcaino, Maricarmen
    Wharton, Christopher
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10):
  • [37] Environmental impacts of lighting technologies - Life cycle assessment and sensitivity analysis
    Welz, Tobias
    Hischier, Roland
    Hilty, Lorenz M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2011, 31 (03) : 334 - 343
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: Environmental impacts and energy balance
    Morales, Marjorie
    Quintero, Julian
    Conejeros, Raul
    Aroca, German
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 : 1349 - 1361
  • [39] Life cycle environmental impacts of inhalers
    Jeswani, Harish Kumar
    Azapagic, Adisa
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 237
  • [40] THE LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CONSUMPTION
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 23 (01) : 27 - 47