Retrospective Analysis of Dental Implant Stability in Relation to Mandibular Bone Density and Cortical Thickness in Osteopenic and Osteoporotic Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Probst, Monika [1 ]
Probst, Florian [2 ]
Troeltzsch, Matthias [2 ]
Bruckbauer, Matthias [3 ]
Marka, Alexander W. [4 ]
Andreisek, Gustav [5 ,6 ]
Frauenfelder, Thomas [6 ,7 ]
Burian, Egon [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Neuroradiol, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Facial Plast Surg, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Salzburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[5] Cantonal Hosp Frauenfeld, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, CH-8500 Frauenfeld, Switzerland
[6] Univ Zurich, Fac Med, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[7] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
osteoporosis; mandibular bone density; dental implants; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; cone beam computed tomography; bone mineral density; HOUNSFIELD UNITS; IN-VIVO; TOMOGRAPHY; DXA;
D O I
10.3390/jcm14041339
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between cervical spine and jaw bone mineral density (BMD) and assess how cortical thickness and BMD influence primary implant stability (PIS) across different bone health conditions. Methods: The study included 29 patients (mean age: 63.7 +/- 13.7 years; 13 women) and 15 healthy controls (mean age: 25.3 +/- 3.0 years; seven women). Cervical spine (C2-C4) and mandibular BMD were evaluated using asynchronous calibration and manual segmentation. Cortical thickness was measured, and primary implant stability was assessed via insertion torque in Newton centimeters (Ncm). Results: Cervical spine BMD was significantly lower in the patient group compared to controls (203.0 +/- 51.0 vs. 252.0 +/- 21.7 mg/dL, p < 0.0001). No significant correlation was found between mandibular BMD and cervical spine BMD in both groups (patients: rho = 0.1287; p = 0.506, controls r = -0.1214; p = 0.667). Linear regression analysis revealed that cortical thickness alone, not implant site BMD, significantly influenced PIS (F(2.74) = 5.597, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Asynchronous calibration accurately quantifies cervical and mandibular BMD. Cortical thickness rather than overall bone density emerges as a critical factor in determining implant stability. These findings suggest that clinicians should prioritize cortical thickness assessment when planning dental implant procedures, potentially improving outcomes across diverse patient bone health profiles.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distributions for Mandibular Dental Implant-Supported Overdentures with Magnetic Attachments in Osteoporotic and Normal Bone
    Hu, Fengling
    Zhang, Limin
    Zhang, Jianguo
    Zheng, Yicai
    Li, Yuan
    Zhang, Xiaoying
    Song, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 37 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [22] Bone mineral density changes in osteoporotic and osteopenic patients after COVID-19 infection
    Elmedany, Samah Hamdy
    Badr, Omaima Ibrahim
    Abu-Zaid, Mohammed Hassan
    Tabra, Samar Abd Alhamed
    EGYPTIAN RHEUMATOLOGY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 49 (01)
  • [23] Histomorphometric Analysis of Bone Density in Relation to Tactile Sense of the Surgeon During Dental Implant Placement
    Rokn, Amir Reza
    Labibzadeh, Akram
    Ghohroudi, Amir Alireza Rasouli
    Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza
    Solhjoo, Somaye
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2018, 12 : 46 - 52
  • [24] Variations in crestal cortical bone thickness at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone
    Ko, Yi-Chun
    Huang, Heng-Li
    Shen, Yen-Wen
    Cai, Jyun-Yi
    Fuh, Lih-Jyh
    Hsu, Jui-Ting
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (03) : 440 - 446
  • [25] Evaluation of Peri-Implant Crestal Bone Loss with Different Implant Systems, Primary Stability, Bone Density and Soft Tissue Thickness: A Retrospective Study
    Shenoy A.
    Rohinikumar S.
    Maiti S.
    Sivaswamy V.
    Rajaraman V.
    Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 2023, 33 (04) : 53 - 58
  • [26] Bone mineral density and mandibular bone quality in patients receiving dental implants
    A. Taguchi
    Osteoporosis International, 2007, 18 : 121 - 122
  • [28] Optimal Microimplant Sites in the Mandibular Retromolar Area: Mesh Analysis of Cortical Bone Thickness and Density in CBCT Images
    Wang, Sen
    Bang, Li
    Park, Hyo-Sang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY, 2021, 39 (03): : 907 - 914
  • [29] Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: A retrospective clinical study
    Turkyilmaz I.
    McGlumphy E.A.
    BMC Oral Health, 8 (1)
  • [30] WNT16 Influences Bone Mineral Density, Cortical Bone Thickness, Bone Strength, and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk
    Zheng, Hou-Feng
    Tobias, Jon H.
    Duncan, Emma
    Evans, David M.
    Eriksson, Joel
    Paternoster, Lavinia
    Yerges-Armstrong, Laura M.
    Lehtimaki, Terho
    Bergstrom, Ulrica
    Kahonen, Mika
    Leo, Paul J.
    Raitakari, Olli
    Laaksonen, Marika
    Nicholson, Geoffrey C.
    Viikari, Jorma
    Ladouceur, Martin
    Lyytikainen, Leo-Pekka
    Medina-Gomez, Carolina
    Rivadeneira, Fernando
    Prince, Richard L.
    Sievanen, Harri
    Leslie, William D.
    Mellstrom, Dan
    Eisman, John A.
    Moverare-Skrtic, Sofia
    Goltzman, David
    Hanley, David A.
    Jones, Graeme
    Pourcain, Beate St.
    Xiao, Yongjun
    Timpson, Nicholas J.
    Smith, George Davey
    Reid, Ian R.
    Ring, Susan M.
    Sambrook, Philip N.
    Karlsson, Magnus
    Dennison, Elaine M.
    Kemp, John P.
    Danoy, Patrick
    Sayers, Adrian
    Wilson, Scott G.
    Nethander, Maria
    McCloskey, Eugene
    Vandenput, Liesbeth
    Eastell, Richard
    Liu, Jeff
    Spector, Tim
    Mitchell, Braxton D.
    Streeten, Elizabeth A.
    Brommage, Robert
    PLOS GENETICS, 2012, 8 (07):