Stigma in Mexican patients with Lung Cancer: Psychometric Properties of the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) - Brief version

被引:0
|
作者
Flores-Juarez, Joel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Galindo-Vazquez, Oscar [2 ]
Ortega-Andeane, Patricia [1 ]
Fresan-Orellana, Ana [4 ]
Montero-Pardo, Xolyanetzin [5 ]
Estape, Tania [6 ]
Arroyo-Hernandez, Marisol [3 ]
Cabrera-Miranda, Luis Antonio [3 ]
Arrieta, Oscar [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Psicol, Mexico City, Mexico
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Serv Psicooncol, Unidad Invest & Desarrollo Psicooncol, INCan, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
[3] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Unidad Func Oncol Torac, INCan, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
[4] Inst Nacl Psiquiatria Ramon de la Fuente Muniz, Subdirecc Invest Clin, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
[5] Univ Autonoma Sinaloa, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
[6] Univ Barcelona, Coordinadora Psicooncol Fdn FEFOC, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Direcc Gen, INCan, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
关键词
Lung cancer; stigma; instrument; psychometric properties; Mexican population; RELIABILITY; DEPRESSION; VALIDITY; ANXIETY; BREAST; SHAME; SELF; HEAD;
D O I
10.1017/S1478951524001263
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Stigma in lung cancer patients may be associated with various negative outcomes such as increased psychosocial symptoms, severity of physical symptoms, and may act as a barrier to medical help-seeking behavior. The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing health-related stigma in lung cancer patients. Objectives. To determine the psychometric properties of the CLCSS in a Mexican sample of lung cancer patients. Methods. A non-experimental, instrumental design was employed, using non-probabilistic sampling based on availability. The sample included 265 lung cancer patients. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega were used for internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, through Pearson correlation coefficient. Results. The 17-item version yielded a model with 4 factors (stigma and shame, social isolation, discrimination, and smoking) explaining 50.74% of the variance, with adequate values of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Significance of results. The Mexican version of the CLCSS is culturally appropriate, brief, psychometrically valid, and reliable for assessing health-related stigma in Mexican lung cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lung Cancer Screening and Stigma: Do Smoking-Related Differences in Perceived Lung Cancer Stigma Emerge Prior to Diagnosis?
    Williamson, Timothy J.
    Rawl, Susan M.
    Kale, Minal S.
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    STIGMA AND HEALTH, 2023, 8 (04) : 497 - 500
  • [42] Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer
    Bu, Xiaofan
    Li, Shuangshuang
    Cheng, Andy S. K.
    Ng, Peter H. F.
    Xu, Xianghua
    Xia, Yimin
    Liu, Xiangyu
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [43] STIGMA IN ASTHMA PATIENTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY TO ESTABLISH THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MALAY VERSION OF STIGMA SCALE (M-SS)
    Ahmad, S.
    Ismail, A. I.
    Zim, M. A. M.
    Qamar, M.
    Ismail, N. E.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2016, 21 : 169 - 169
  • [44] Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Substance Abuse Self-Stigma Scale
    Sukut, Ozge
    Buzlu, Sevim
    ADDICTA-THE TURKISH JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 2022, 9 (03): : 295 - 302
  • [45] Validation of the Malay Version of the Shame and Stigma Scale among Cancer Patients in Malaysia
    Zhang, Zheng
    Azman, Nizuwan
    Eyu, Hui Ting
    Jaafar, Nik Ruzyanei Nik
    Sahimi, Hajar Mohd Salleh
    Yunus, Mohd Razif Mohamad
    Shariff, Noorsuzana Mohd
    Hami, Rohayu
    Mansor, Nor Shuhada
    Lu, Ping
    Bin Abdullah, Mohammad Farris Iman Leong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [46] Psychometric properties of the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) in Chinese cancer patients: a cross-sectional study
    Zhu, Lei
    Yao, Juntao
    Wu, Liyang
    Wang, Jun
    Qiu, Mengting
    Zhang, Chunyu
    Zhang, Hongmei
    Xie, Juan
    Liu, Ailan
    Ranchor, Adelita
    Schroevers, Maya
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [47] Validation of the Chinese Version of the Shame and Stigma Scale in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
    Tseng, Wei-Ting
    Lee, Yu
    Hung, Chi-Fa
    Lin, Pao-Yen
    Chien, Chih-Yen
    Chuang, Hui-Ching
    Fang, Fu-Min
    Li, Shau-Hsuan
    Huang, Tai-Lin
    Chong, Mian-Yoon
    Wang, Liang-Jen
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 10297 - 10305
  • [48] Validation of the Canadian Version of the Shame and Stigma Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Bobevski, Irene
    Kissane, David W.
    Desroches, Justin
    De Simone, Avina
    Henry, Melissa
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (08) : 7553 - 7565
  • [49] A Comprehensive Vision to Reduce Lung Cancer Stigma: Changing Cultural Perspectives on Lung Cancer
    Rigney, M.
    Studts, J.
    Criswell, A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (11) : S1814 - S1814
  • [50] The Lung Cancer Stigma Communications Assessment Tool: Supporting Engagement with the Lung Cancer Community
    Studts, J.
    Hoover, K.
    Carter-Bawa, L.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (10) : S416 - S417