Artificial intelligence for better goals of care documentation

被引:0
|
作者
Piscitello, Gina [1 ,2 ]
Schell, Jane O. [1 ,2 ]
Arnold, Robert M. [3 ]
Schenker, Yael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Med, Div Internal Med, Sect Palliat Care & Med Eth, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Palliat Res Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Brookdale Dept Geriatr & Palliat Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
Communication; Ethics; End of life care; END-OF-LIFE; NEAR-DEATH; ASSOCIATIONS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/spcare-2023-004657
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Lower rates of goals of care (GOC) conversations have been observed in non-white hospitalised patients, which may contribute to racial disparities in end-of-life care. We aimed to assess how a targeted initiative to increase GOC documentation rates is associated with GOC documentation by race.Methods We retrospectively assessed GOC documentation during a targeted GOC initiative for adult patients with an artificial intelligence predicted elevated risk of mortality. Patients were admitted to an urban academic medical centre in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania between July 2021 and 31 December 2022.Results The 3643 studied patients had a median age of 72 (SD 13.0) and were predominantly white (87%) with 42% admitted to an intensive care unit and 15% dying during admission. GOC documentation was completed for 28% (n=1019/3643). By race, GOC was documented for 30% black (n=105/351), 28% white (n=883/3161) and 24% other (n=31/131) patients (p=0.3933). There was no statistical difference in the rate of documented GOC among races over time (p=0.5142).Conclusions A targeted initiative to increase documented GOC conversations for hospitalised patients with an elevated risk of mortality is associated with similar documentation rates across racial groups. Further research is needed to assess whether this initiative may promote racial equity in GOC documentation in other settings.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial Intelligence and Family Medicine: Better Together
    Liaw, Winston
    Kakadiaris, Ioannis A.
    FAMILY MEDICINE, 2020, 52 (01) : 8 - 10
  • [32] Artificial Intelligence and Academic Journals: For Better and for Worse
    Garrido, Ivan Lapuente
    BRAZILIAN ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2023, 20 (04):
  • [33] Artificial Intelligence: Power for Civilisation - and for Better Healthcare
    Horgan, Denis
    Romao, Mario
    Morre, Servaas A.
    Kalra, Dipak
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2020, 22 (5-6) : 145 - 161
  • [34] Artificial intelligence in primary care
    Mistry, Pritesh
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (686): : 422 - 423
  • [35] Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Care
    Schleidgen, Sebastian
    Friedrich, Orsolya
    ETHIK IN DER MEDIZIN, 2023, 35 (02) : 169 - 172
  • [36] Artificial intelligence in health care
    Isaacs, David
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2020, 56 (10) : 1493 - 1495
  • [37] Artificial Intelligence in Spine Care
    Gutman, Michael J.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Murphy, Hamadi
    Flanders, Adam E.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (04): : 121 - 124
  • [38] Artificial Intelligence in neurocritical care
    Schweingruber, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 28 : 27 - 27
  • [39] Artificial intelligence for better or for worse-ish
    Cawley, Alec
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2018, 238 (3176) : 54 - 54
  • [40] Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care
    Mathur, Piyush
    Burns, Michael L.
    INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 2019, 57 (02) : 89 - 102