Open Source Tools for Bayesian Search

被引:0
|
作者
Harris, Michael [1 ]
Perree, Nicola [1 ]
Wright, James [1 ]
Barr, Jordi [1 ]
机构
[1] Def Sci & Technol Lab, Cyber & Informat Syst, Salisbury, England
关键词
Bayesian search; Stone Soup; Sensor management; Tracking; State estimation;
D O I
10.1117/12.3012763
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
When searching for a target whose state is unknown, it is desirable to implement an appropriate search method to maximise efficiency through the minimisation of an associated cost function. The posterior distribution over the target state returned by Bayesian search provides just such a function. Nevertheless, finding the best algorithm for a given task is often non-trivial; a common approach is to build a model that accurately represents the scenario and to compare the efficacy of competing algorithms. This requires a toolkit that is easy to adapt and is able to demonstrate a range of sensor characteristics, target behaviours and search schemes. This paper shows how Stone Soup, an open source state estimation and tracking framework, can be an effective tool for Bayesian search. It demonstrates how user-defined search scenarios can be incorporated into Stone Soup's sensor management capability to model Bayesian search algorithms and compare them against heuristic methods. Several examples are provided to demonstrate this. The benefit of using Stone Soup is that the implementer of Bayesian search need not exert significant energy understanding or reinventing algorithms for modelling all aspects of sensor management. Instead, they can focus on their area of expertise, building up an appropriate model, and use the relevant tools in Stone Soup to implement the search algorithms. This paper lays the foundations for more complex search scenarios to be modelled using Stone Soup, offering more realism to the user.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Open source tools for geographic analysis in transport planning
    Robin Lovelace
    Journal of Geographical Systems, 2021, 23 : 547 - 578
  • [42] Industrial Experience with Open-Source EDA Tools
    Lueck, Christian
    Lopera, Daniela Sanchez
    Wenzek, Sven
    Ecker, Wolfgang
    MLCAD '22: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 ACM/IEEE 4TH WORKSHOP ON MACHINE LEARNING FOR CAD (MLCAD), 2022, : 143 - 143
  • [44] Making more out of open-source tools
    West, B
    IEEE DESIGN & TEST OF COMPUTERS, 2006, 23 (02): : 176 - 176
  • [45] Comparative Study of Open Source Capture and Replay Tools
    Nedyalkova, S.
    Bernardino, J.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2014, 12 (04) : 675 - 682
  • [46] Open Source vs Proprietary Project Management Tools
    Abramova, Veronika
    Pires, Francisco
    Bernardino, Jorge
    NEW ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1, 2016, 444 : 331 - 340
  • [47] An Acceptance Empirical Assessment of Open Source Test Tools
    Costa Valentim, Natasha M.
    Lopes, Adriana
    Cesar, Edson
    Conte, Tayana
    Rizzo Vincenzi, Auri Marcelo
    Maldonado, Jose Carlos
    ICEIS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS - VOL 2, 2017, : 379 - 386
  • [48] Open-Source Tools for Automated Localization Microscopy
    Deschamps, Joran
    Mund, Markus
    Schroeder, Daniel
    Ries, Jonas
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 118 (03) : 147A - 147A
  • [49] Evaluation of Open Source Anti-Rootkit Tools
    Romana, Sandeep
    Jha, Amit Kumar
    Pareek, Himanshu
    Eswari, P. R. L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 IEEE WORKSHOP ON ANTI-MALWARE TESTING RESEARCH (WATER'13), 2013, : 10 - 15
  • [50] How Open Source Tools Can Benefit Industry
    Ebert, Christof
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2009, 26 (02) : 50 - 51