Active Versus Passive Drainage Systems for Subdural Hematomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Porto, Silvio [1 ]
Meira, Davi Amorim [1 ]
da Cunha, Beatriz Lopes Bernardo [2 ]
Fontes, Jefferson Heber Marques [3 ]
Pustilnik, Hugo Nunes [4 ]
Nunes, Gabriel Souza Medrado [5 ]
Cerqueira, Gabriel Araujo [1 ]
da Paz, Matheus Gomes da Silva [6 ]
Alcantara, Tancredo [6 ,7 ]
Dourado, Jules Carlos [6 ]
de Avelar, Leonardo Miranda [6 ]
机构
[1] Bahiana Sch Med, Dept Med, v Dom Joao VI,n275, BR-40290000 Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Bahia State, Dept Med, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[3] Metropolitan Union Educ & Culture, Dept Med, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[4] Univ Salvador, Dept Med, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Bahia, Dept Med, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[6] Gen Hosp Roberto Santos, Dept Neurosurg, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[7] NICC Nucl Integrado Cerebro & Coluna, Dept Neurosurg, Brazi, BA, Brazil
关键词
Subdural; Active; Passive; Drainage; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1227/ons.0000000000001252
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) management involves various surgical techniques, with drainage systems playing a pivotal role. While passive drainage (PD) and active drainage (AD) are both used, their efficacy remains contentious. Some studies favor PD for lower recurrence rates, while others suggest AD superiority. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to address this controversy, aiming to provide clarity on optimal drainage modalities post-CSDH evacuation.METHODS:This systematic review and meta-analysis followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews guidelines, searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until February 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing active vs PD for subdural hematomas. Data extraction involved independent researchers, and statistical analysis was conducted using R software. The assessment of risk of bias was performed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions framework and the Risk Of Bias 2 tool.RESULTS:In this meta-analysis, involving 1949 patients with AD and 1346 with PD, no significant differences were observed in recurrence rates between the active (13.6%) and passive (16.4%) drainage groups (risk ratio [RR] = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.58-1.31). Similarly, for complications, infection, hemorrhage, and mortality, no significant disparities were found between the 2 drainage modalities. Complication rates were 7.5% for active and 12.6% for PD (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.36-1.52). Infection rates were available for 635 patients of the active group, counting for 2% and 2.6%, respectively (RR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.24-4.01). Hemorrhage rates were also available for 635 patients of the active group, counting for 1.1% and 2.2%, respectively (RR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.11-1.81). Mortality rates were 2.7% and 2.5%, respectively (RR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.61-1.46).CONCLUSION:Our study found no significant difference between passive and AD for managing complications, recurrence, infection, hemorrhage, or mortality in CSDH cases. Further large-scale randomized trials are needed for clarity.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 37
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RETRACTED: Active Versus Passive Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Retracted Article)
    Forner, David
    Noel, Christopher W.
    Horwich, Peter
    Hong, Paul
    Shoman, Nael
    EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (01): : 32 - 40
  • [42] Efficacy and Safety of Subdural Drains After Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Alcala-Cerra, Gabriel
    Young, Adam M. H.
    Rafael Moscote-Salazar, Luis
    Paternina-Caicedo, Angel
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (06) : 1148 - 1157
  • [43] Active and passive forms of destructive leadership in a military context: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fosse, Thomas Hol
    Anders, Skogstad
    Einarsen, Stale Valvatne
    Martinussen, Monica
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 28 (05) : 708 - 722
  • [44] Twist drill craniostomy vs burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yagnik, Karan J.
    Goyal, Anshit
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (12) : 3229 - 3241
  • [45] Subdural Drainage versus Subperiosteal Drainage in Burr-Hole Trepanation for Symptomatic Chronic Subdural Hematomas
    Bellut, David
    Woernle, Christoph Michael
    Burkhardt, Jan-Karl
    Kockro, Ralf Alfons
    Bertalanffy, Helmut
    Krayenbuehl, Niklaus
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 77 (01) : 111 - 118
  • [46] Twist drill craniostomy vs burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Karan J. Yagnik
    Anshit Goyal
    Jamie J. Van Gompel
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2021, 163 : 3229 - 3241
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage versus percutaneous drainage for pancreatic fluid collection; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khizar, Hayat
    Zhicheng, Huang
    Chenyu, Le
    Yanhua, Wu
    Jianfeng, Yang
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2023, 55 (01)
  • [48] Systematic review and meta-analysis of closed suction drainage versus non-drainage in primary hip arthroplasty
    Kelly, E. G.
    Cashman, J. P.
    Conroy, R.
    O'Byrne, J.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 183 : S44 - S44
  • [49] Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis with an adjusted subgroup analysis
    Ali, Syed Hasham
    Tharwani, Zoaib Habib
    Siddiqui, Asad Ali
    Iqbal, Fizza
    Sadiq, Mahnoor
    Abdullah, Ali
    Khalid, Abdullah
    Ansari, Huzaifa Ul Haq
    Usman, Muhammad
    Qazi, Shurjeel Uddin
    Munaf, Uzair
    Ul Haque, Ibtehaj
    Marsia, Shayan
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE, 2024, 16
  • [50] A Comparison of Subperiosteal or Subgaleal Drainage with Subdural Drainage on the Outcomes of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Yonglin
    Lu, Qin
    Lenahan, Cameron
    Yang, Shuxu
    Zhou, Daoyang
    Qi, Xuchen
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 135 : e723 - e730