Critical Review of Axial Resistance in Buried Pipelines Subjected to Transient and Permanent Ground Deformations

被引:0
|
作者
Rajah, Sri [1 ]
机构
[1] CDM Smith, Bellevue, WA 98007 USA
来源
PIPELINES 2024: MULTIDISCIPLINE | 2024年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Understanding the pipe-soil interaction effects at the pipe-soil interface of a buried pipeline is needed to estimate the stresses and strains on the pipeline subjected to longitudinal transient and permanent ground displacements during a seismic event. In general, pipe-soil interaction effects would be dependent on the actual displacement pattern, pipe-soil interface behavior, configuration of the pipe segments as well as joints, and available axial flexibility within pipe joints. In buried pipelines with uniform pipe barrels, such as in most continuous pipeline situations, axial resistance is primarily contributed by frictional and adhesive behaviors of the pipe-soil interface. However, in certain situations of continuous pipelines (e.g., flanged joints) and in segmented pipelines (e.g., bell- and spigot-type configurations), pipeline cross sections are typically larger than the regular pipeline barrel cross sections. Due to these configurations, the axial resistance in a pipe barrel does not develop solely from pure axial frictional and/or adhesive resistance on the pipe-soil interface. A bearing type resistance (e.g., passive resistance at the enlarged joints) would also be contributing to the axial resistance of the pipe. It should be noted that the maximum passive resistance that could be developed on the pipeline joint is also a function of the relative movement at the pipe-soil interface. While underestimating axial resistance for traditional non-seismic situations mostly yield conservative designs, such is not the case for seismic design conditions. Especially important is the axial resistance contribution in estimating the connection force demand arising from potential seismic hazards acting on a pipeline. Recognizing the importance of accurate estimation of the axial force connection demand on a buried pipeline from a design seismic hazard, a critical review of the approaches to estimate the axial resistance on a pipeline has been completed. This paper presents a summary of the current practice to estimate maximum axial resistance in a buried pipeline, critical review of the resistance components contributing to the axial resistance, and a proposed analytical approach to estimate the maximum axial resistance on a continuous or segmented pipeline with enlarged joints.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 216
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Fault induced permanent ground deformations - an experimental comparison of wet and dry soil and implications for buried structures
    Johansson, J
    Konagai, K
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (01) : 45 - 53
  • [32] Slip Resistance of Sandy and Clayey Backfills against Relative Axial Movement of Buried Steel Pipelines
    Rostami, Hamid
    Osouli, Abdolreza
    Touchaei, Hamed
    Kargar, Pourya
    GEO-CONGRESS 2022: ADVANCES IN MONITORING AND SENSING; EMBANKMENTS, SLOPES, AND DAMS; PAVEMENTS; AND GEO-EDUCATION, 2022, 336 : 249 - 256
  • [33] Laboratory Investigation of Buried Small-Diameter Steel Pipes Subjected to Axial Ground Movement
    Andersen, Darren
    Reza, Auchib
    Dhar, Ashutosh Sutra
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2025, 16 (02)
  • [34] Buried pipelines subjected to transverse ground movement: Comparison between full-scale testing and numerical modeling
    Karimian, Hamid
    Wijewickreme, Dharma
    Honegger, Doug
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, VOL 4, 2006, : 73 - 79
  • [35] Impact of wind loads on the resistance capacity of the transmission tower subjected to ground surface deformations
    Shu, Qianjin
    Huang, Zhaohui
    Yuan, Guanglin
    Ma, Weiqing
    Ye, Sheng
    Zhou, Jing
    THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2018, 131 : 619 - 630
  • [36] RESPONSE OF BURIED PIPELINES UNDER PERMANENT GROUND MOVEMENTS: PHYSICS-INFORMED DEEP NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH
    Taraghi, Pouya
    Li, Yong
    Yoosef-Ghodsi, Nader
    Fowler, Matt
    Kainat, Muntaseer
    Adeeb, Samer
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 PRESSURE VESSELS & PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP2023, VOL 2, 2023,
  • [37] Experimental Performance Evaluation of Pipelines Rehabilitated with Cured-In-Place Pipe Liner under Earthquake Transient Ground Deformations
    Zhong, Zilan
    Filiatrault, Andre
    Aref, Amjad
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2017, 23 (02)
  • [38] Onshore Buried Steel Fuel Pipelines at Fault Crossings: A Review of Critical Analysis and Design Aspects
    Melissianos, Vasileios E.
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2022, 13 (04)
  • [39] Safety of buried steel natural gas pipelines under earthquake-induced ground shaking: A review
    Psyrras, Nikolaos K.
    Sextos, Anastasios G.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 106 : 254 - 277
  • [40] Effects of Asymmetrical Vertical Soil Stiffness on Strain Demand of Steel Pipelines Subjected to Transverse Vertical Permanent Ground Deformation
    Agbo, Sylvester
    Roy, Kshama
    Adeeb, Samer
    Li, Yong
    GEO-CONGRESS 2022: ADVANCES IN MONITORING AND SENSING; EMBANKMENTS, SLOPES, AND DAMS; PAVEMENTS; AND GEO-EDUCATION, 2022, 336 : 311 - 321