Translation, Validity, and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)

被引:0
|
作者
Deviandri, Romy [1 ,2 ]
Daud, Afrianto [3 ]
Utami, Tania Nugrah [1 ]
Octarina, Putri [1 ]
Aminata, Iman W. [4 ]
Alkaff, Firas Farisi [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Riau, Arifin Achmad Hosp, Fac Med, Diponegoro St 1, Pekanbaru 28133, Riau, Indonesia
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthoped, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Riau, Fac Teachers Training & Educ, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
[4] Fatmawati Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Jakarta, Indonesia
[5] Univ Airlangga, Fac Med, Dept Anat Histol & Pharmacol, Div Pharmacol, Surabaya, Indonesia
[6] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
cross-cultural comparison; patient-reported outcome measure; psychometric; questionnaire; shoulder; rotator cuff; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; ROTATOR CUFF DISEASE; VALIDATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; PATIENT; FORM;
D O I
10.1177/23259671241304656
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a widely used 13-item shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measure for shoulder pain disorders. The English version of SPADI is easy to use and demonstrates excellent measurement properties for clinical and research settings.Purpose: To translate and culturally adapt an Indonesian version of SPADI (SPADI-IDN) and then validate its use in Indonesian patients.Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.Methods: Through a forward and a backward translation process, the validity of the questionnaire was investigated. The study population was 100 patients with shoulder pain who were treated in a hospital in Indonesia. The patients were asked to fill out the SPADI-IDN during their visit. To evaluate the validity of SPADI-IDN, the patients were also asked to fill out the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey and the Oxford Shoulder Score. To assess the test-retest reliability, the same patients were asked to fill out the SPADI-IDN questionnaire again 1 week later. The assessment of construct validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effect, and measurement of error followed the COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. The Bland-Altman method was used to explore absolute agreement.Results: Of the 100 eligible patients, all were used to assess construct validity, and 87 patients (87%) were used to assess test-retest reliability. Almost every established hypothesis about the correlations between SPADI-IDN and other questionnaires could be confirmed, implying good construct validity. No floor or ceiling effects were found. The intraclass correlation value was 0.99, indicating strong test-retest reliability. A Cronbach alpha was 0.95, indicating a good internal consistency. The Bland-Altman analysis did not reveal any bias. The standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change at the individual and group levels were 2.65, 7.3, and 0.7, respectively.Conclusion: The SPADI-IDN represents a valid and reliable tool for measuring pain and disability in patients with shoulder pain disorders.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Facial Disability Index
    Ozden, Fatih
    Karaman, Ozgur Nadiye
    Tugay, Nazan
    Savas, Ozden
    Sozen, Tevfik
    Ucuncu, Harun
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (01) : 148 - 157
  • [42] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire
    Yoon, Jisun
    Choi, Kyoung Hyo
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Yang, Seo Yon
    Sim, Mi Kyung
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2013, 37 (06): : 814 - 823
  • [43] Validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the International Index of Erectile Function
    Kloping, Yudhistira Pradnyan
    Muharram, Farizal Rizky
    Reswari, Ardhina Mahendrata
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2021, 14 (02) : 95 - 99
  • [44] The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability
    Todri, Jasemin
    Lena, Orges
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [45] Validation and reliability of a Japanese version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: A cross-sectional study
    Sekiguchi, Takuya
    Hagiwara, Yoshihiro
    Ando, Akira
    Kanazawa, Kenji
    Suzuki, Kazuaki
    Koide, Masashi
    Yabe, Yutaka
    Onoda, Satsuki
    Itoi, Eiji
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2021, 26 (04) : 595 - 598
  • [46] Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Korean Version of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire and Shoulder Rating Questionnaire
    Choi, Yuseong
    Park, Jong Wook
    Noh, Sujin
    Kim, Min Su
    Park, Yun Hee
    Sung, Duk Hyun
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2015, 39 (05): : 705 - 717
  • [47] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire in patients with shoulder pain
    Ciftci, Betul
    Uzunkulaoglu, Aslihan
    Topcu, Deniz Oke
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2021, 55 (03) : 208 - 212
  • [48] Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck and low back pain: Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the pain disability index
    Bicer, A
    Sahin, G
    Cimen, OB
    Erdogan, C
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2004, 63 : 428 - 428
  • [49] Urdu version of the neck disability index: a reliability and validity study
    Farooq, Muhammad Nazim
    Mohseni-Bandpei, Mohammad A.
    Gilani, Syed Amir
    Hafeez, Ambreen
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18
  • [50] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of lumbar stiffness disability index
    Yapar, Aliekber
    Yapar, Dilek
    Selcuk, Hueseyin
    Kilicaslan, Omer Faruk
    Egerci, Omer Faruk
    Karatas, Ozlem
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2024, 58 (05)