Improving machine learning predictions to estimate fishing effort using vessel's tracking data

被引:1
|
作者
Samarao, J. [1 ,4 ]
Moreno, A. [1 ]
Gaspar, M. B. [1 ,3 ]
Rufino, M. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Portuguese Inst Sea & Atmosphere IPMA, Av Dr Alfredo Magalhaes Ramalho 6, P-149565 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Sci, Ctr Stat & its Applicat CEAUL, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] CCMAR, Faro, Portugal
[4] Nova Sch Sci & Technol FCT, Almada, Portugal
关键词
Fishing effort; Machine leaning; Spatio-temporal high-resolution data; Small scale fisheries; FISHERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102953
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Small-Scale Fisheries (SSF) comprise over 80 % of the global fleet and serve as the primary income source for numerous coastal communities. However, these critical fisheries face various threats. To effectively monitor SSF activities and their ecological impacts, it is required precise estimation of fishing effort using high-resolution spatio-temporal data. This information can identify areas with high fishing density, warranting protection of their main fishing grounds against other users (i.e. ocean grabbing), while also signalling potential stock depletion requiring management interventions and preserving the ecosystems from which these fisheries depend on. In this study, we propose a series of steps to enhance the performance of Machine Learning algorithms in estimating fishing effort. We assessed seven supervised ML algorithms, including Logistic Regression, Ridge Classifier, Random Forest Classifier, K-Neighbours, Gradient Boosting Classifier, LinearSVC, Recurrent Neural Networks and XGBoost, using four case studies, from bivalve dredge and octopus pots and traps fisheries. First, in a preliminary statistical analysis between common error measures derived from the confusion matrix was decided to use accuracy, precision, and sensitivity as evaluation criteria. We found that a simple moving average applied to speed, employed as a pre-processing technique using ten neighbouring points, showed up to 3 % improvement in results. Random Forest and XGBoost gave the best performances among the models compared (18 % change), using the variables Latitude, Longitude, Speed, Time, and Month (accuracies near 99 %)(61 % change). The proportion of the training/test dataset, showed a minimal impact on accuracy, with changes of less than 8 % when varying the training data percentage between 10 % and 90 %, making 60 % a suitable compromise. Considering the sampling unit to be (1) point-based (randomly selected pings) or (2) boat trip-based (randomly selected boat trips), leaded to changes in accuracy between 2.53 % and 3.99 %, depending on the model. Temporal resolution (ping rate) showed minimal effects on model performance, ranging from less than 2 % for intervals between 30 s (raw data with irregular time series) to 10 min (regular time series). As a post- processing step, it was concluded that replacing isolated data points with neighbouring values, significantly enhanced the detection of fishing events, with improvements ranging from 80 % to 250 %, depending on the model. In conclusion, this study presents a straightforward procedure for selecting a machine learning method and enhancing its power of classification using simple procedures. These approaches should be applied in all works using machine learning to produce fishing effort maps.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Improving Mortality Predictions for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Follow-Up Data and Machine Learning
    Jaeger, Byron C.
    Cantor, Ryan S.
    Sthanam, Venkata
    Rudraraju, Ramaraju
    CIRCULATION-GENOMIC AND PRECISION MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (02): : E002877
  • [12] Estimating fishing effort in small-scale fisheries using GPS tracking data and random forests
    Behivoke, Faustinato
    Etienne, Marie-Pierre
    Guitton, Jerome
    Randriatsara, Roddy Michel
    Ranaivoson, Eulalie
    Leopold, Marc
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 123
  • [13] Improving Earnings Predictions and Abnormal Returns with Machine Learning
    Hunt, Joshua O. S.
    Myers, James N.
    Myers, Linda A.
    ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2022, 36 (01) : 131 - 149
  • [14] Improving machine learning predictions for metastases in colorectal cancer
    Azlan, Ali
    Rafaqat, Zoha
    Ahmad, Abraiz
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (11):
  • [15] Algorithm of Trawler Fishing Effort Extraction Based on BeiDou Vessel Monitoring System Data
    Zhang, Shengmao
    Yu, Bailang
    Zheng, Qiaoling
    Zhou, Weifeng
    GEO-INFORMATICS IN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE ECOSYSTEM, 2016, 569 : 159 - 168
  • [16] A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms to Estimate Effort in Varying Sized Software
    Rahman, Md Tanziar
    Islam, Md. Motaharul
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 IEEE REGION 10 SYMPOSIUM (TENSYMP), 2019, : 137 - 142
  • [17] Improving Mental Disorder Predictions using Feature-Based Machine Learning Techninques
    Muetunda, Faustino
    Pais, Sebastiao
    Sabry, Soumaya
    Dias, Gael
    Pombo, Nuno
    Cordeiro, Joao
    2023 23RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOPS, ICDMW 2023, 2023, : 1279 - 1288
  • [18] Improving streamflow predictions across CONUS by integrating advanced machine learning models and diverse data
    Tayal, Kshitij
    Arvind, Renganathan
    Lu, Dan
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (10):
  • [19] Improving Discharge Predictions in Ungauged Basins: Harnessing the Power of Disaggregated Data Modeling and Machine Learning
    Muhebwa, Aggrey
    Gleason, Colin J.
    Feng, Dongmei
    Taneja, Jay
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2024, 60 (09)
  • [20] Machine learning predictions of irradiation embrittlement in reactor pressure vessel steels
    Yu-chen Liu
    Henry Wu
    Tam Mayeshiba
    Benjamin Afflerbach
    Ryan Jacobs
    Josh Perry
    Jerit George
    Josh Cordell
    Jinyu Xia
    Hao Yuan
    Aren Lorenson
    Haotian Wu
    Matthew Parker
    Fenil Doshi
    Alexander Politowicz
    Linda Xiao
    Dane Morgan
    Peter Wells
    Nathan Almirall
    Takuya Yamamoto
    G. Robert Odette
    npj Computational Materials, 8