Capital structure decisions and R&D investment: The contingency role of firm size

被引:0
|
作者
Ali, Sarmad [1 ]
Rangone, Adalberto [1 ,3 ]
Muhammad, Hussain [2 ]
机构
[1] G D Annunzio Univ Chieti Pescara, Pescara, Italy
[2] Amer Univ Ras Al Khaimah AURAK, Sch Business, Dept Accounting & Finance, Bldg 75,Str Sheikh Humaid Bin Mohamed,POB: 10021, Rasal Khaimah 72603, U Arab Emirates
[3] Univ Perugia, Perugia, Italy
关键词
capital structure decisions; debt financing; equity financing; firm size; R&D investment; U.S. pharmaceutical industry; AGENCY COSTS; FINANCING CONSTRAINTS; CASH FLOW; INNOVATION; EQUITY; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; MATTER;
D O I
10.1177/03063070241284895
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper explores how the size of a firm influences the relationship between capital structure choices and research and development (R&D) investment. By analyzing data from publicly listed U.S. pharmaceutical firms between 2011 and 2020 and using an instrumental variables regression, we present evidence that the impact of capital structure on R&D investment varies depending on firm size. Our findings show that firm size plays a critical role in shaping financing decisions to support R&D. Specifically, large and small firms employ different strategies for developing and implementing R&D projects. Our results reveal that R&D investment is negatively (positively) and significantly associated with debt financing (equity financing). Moreover, we show that firm size attenuates the adverse effect of debt financing on R&D investment and accentuates the positive effect of equity financing. Our study provides a refined distinction between debt and equity financing and clarifies the importance of structural characteristics in explaining a firm's R&D investment decisions. Our study assists policymakers and practitioners in designing effective policies to enhance the understanding of the complex relationship between capital structure decisions and R&D investment.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Firm size and R&D tax incentives
    Koga, T
    TECHNOVATION, 2003, 23 (07) : 643 - 648
  • [32] Evaluation of public investment in R&D -: Towards a contingency analysis
    Piric, A
    Reeve, N
    POLICY EVALUATION IN INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY: TOWARDS BEST PRACTICES, 1997, : 49 - 64
  • [33] R&D capital, ambidexterity innovation, and firm performance
    Li B.
    Yin J.
    Su Y.
    Harbin Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2019, 40 (03): : 634 - 640
  • [34] Top management team characteristics, R&D investment and capital structure in the IT industry
    Chen, Hsiang-Lan
    Hsu, Wen-Tsung
    Huang, Yen-Sheng
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2010, 35 (03) : 319 - 333
  • [35] Top management team characteristics, R&D investment and capital structure in the IT industry
    Hsiang-Lan Chen
    Wen-Tsung Hsu
    Yen-Sheng Huang
    Small Business Economics, 2010, 35 : 319 - 333
  • [36] An R&D options selection model for investment decisions
    Coldrick, S
    Longhurst, P
    Ivey, P
    Hannis, J
    TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (03) : 185 - 193
  • [37] R&D intensity and firm performance of SME firms in Thailand: the moderating role of firm size
    Suttipun, Muttanachai
    Insee, Krittiga
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [38] Managerial human capital and corporate R&D investment
    Xu, Jing
    Li, Haizheng
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2023, 213 : 151 - 171
  • [39] SOCIAL CAPITAL AND INVESTMENT IN R&D: NEW EXTERNALITIES
    Sequeira, Tiago Neves
    Ferreira-Lopes, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 14 (01) : 77 - 97
  • [40] How learning and legitimacy goals influence inter-firm imitation in R&D investment decisions
    Mazzelli, Ambra
    Foss, Nicolai J.
    BRQ-BUSINESS RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2025, 28 (02): : 349 - 370