Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests

被引:0
|
作者
Droppelmann, Guillermo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rodriguez, Constanza [4 ]
Smague, Dali [4 ]
Jorquera, Carlos [5 ]
Feijoo, Felipe [6 ]
机构
[1] MEDS Clin, Res Ctr Med Exercise Sport & Hlth, Santiago, RM, Chile
[2] Univ Catolica Murcia UCAM, Hlth Sci PhD Program, Murcia, Spain
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Finis Terrae, Fac Med, Santiago, RM, Chile
[5] Univ Mayor, Fac Ciencias, Escuela Nutr & Dietet, Santiago, RM, Chile
[6] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Sch Ind Engn, Valparaiso, Chile
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; diagnostic; orthopedics; radiology; tendinopathy; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1530/EOR-24-0016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
center dot Purpose: Different deep-learning models have been employed to aid in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal pathologies. The diagnosis of tendon pathologies could particularly benefit from applying these technologies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of deep learning models in diagnosing tendon pathologies using various imaging modalities. center dot Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted, with searches performed on MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, and SciELO. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to assess the quality of the studies. Diagnostic measures, such as sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive and negative likelihood ratios, area under the curve, and summary receiver operating characteristic, were included using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity and subgroup analyses were also conducted. All statistical analyses and plots were generated using the R software package. The PROSPERO ID is CRD42024506491. center dot Results: Eleven deep-learning models from six articles were analyzed. In the random effects models, the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithms for detecting tendon conditions were 0.910 (95% CI: 0.865; 0.940) and 0.954 (0.909; 0.977). The PLR, NLR, lnDOR, and AUC estimates were found to be 37.075 (95%CI: 4.654; 69.496), 0.114 (95%CI: 0.056; 0.171), 5.160 (95% CI: 4.070; 6.250) with a (P < 0.001), and 96%, respectively. center dot Conclusion: The deep-learning algorithms demonstrated a high level of accuracy level in detecting tendon anomalies. The overall robust performance suggests their potential application as a valuable complementary tool in diagnosing medical images.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 952
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic performance of deep learning in infectious keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Ong, Zun Zheng
    Sadek, Youssef
    Liu, Xiaoxuan
    Qureshi, Riaz
    Liu, Su-Hsun
    Li, Tianjing
    Sounderajah, Viknesh
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Ting, Daniel Shu Wei
    Said, Dalia G.
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    Burton, Matthew J.
    Dua, Harminder Singh
    Ting, Darren Shu Jeng
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [22] Diagnostic performance of deep learning models versus radiologists in COVID-19 pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chavoshi, Mohammadreza
    Zamani, Sara
    Mirshahvalad, Seyed Ali
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2024, 107
  • [23] Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Deep Learning Prediction Models on COVID-19 Severity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Changyu
    Liu, Siru
    Tang, Yu
    Yang, Hao
    Liu, Jialin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [24] Diagnostic Accuracy of Immunochromatographic Tests for the Detection of Norovirus in Stool Specimens: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yoon, Seo Hee
    Kim, Hye Rim
    Ahn, Jong Gyun
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [25] Diagnostic utility of antigen detection rapid diagnostic tests for Covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ghasemi, Somaye
    Harmooshi, Narges Nazari
    Rahim, Fakher
    DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [26] Diagnostic utility of antigen detection rapid diagnostic tests for Covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Somaye Ghasemi
    Narges Nazari Harmooshi
    Fakher Rahim
    Diagnostic Pathology, 17
  • [27] Diagnostic performance of serum cobalamin tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Willis, Cameron D.
    Elshaug, Adam G.
    Milverton, Joanne L.
    Watt, Amber M.
    Metz, Michael P.
    Hiller, Janet E.
    PATHOLOGY, 2011, 43 (05) : 472 - 481
  • [28] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests of the hip: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Reiman, Michael P.
    Goode, Adam P.
    Hegedus, Eric J.
    Cook, Chad E.
    Wright, Alexis A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 47 (14) : 893 - 902
  • [29] Accuracy of diagnostic tests for feline sporotrichosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Domingos, Eric L.
    Souza, Dalton A.
    Alves, Fernando M. S.
    Gorski, Daniela
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    Ferreira, Luana M.
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    ACTA TROPICA, 2025, 263
  • [30] Validation of diagnostic tests for histologic chorioamnionitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Catano Sabogal, Claudia Patricia
    Fonseca, Javier
    Andres Garcia-Perdomo, Herney
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 228 : 13 - 26