Physico-chemical characterization of ten commercial pea protein isolates

被引:1
|
作者
Schumacher, Till [1 ]
Steinmacher, Tatjana [1 ]
Koester, Elena [2 ]
Wagemans, Anja [2 ]
Weiss, Jochen [1 ]
Gibis, Monika [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Food Sci & Biotechnol, Dept Food Mat Sci, Garbenstr 21-25, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Chair Food Engn, Bergstr 120, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Pea; Protein; Solubility; Functionality; Composition; FUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES; ISOELECTRIC PRECIPITATION; EXTRACTION; CHICKPEA; LENTIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110996
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
This study screened ten different commercial pea protein isolates in terms of composition including protein-, fat-, dry matter-, ash-, and sodium chloride content, color, molecular weight distribution, as well as functionality in aqueous suspension including solubility, native pH, water/oil holding capacity, and zeta potential. While composition did not differ strongly between the different protein isolates, excluding minor differences in protein and ash content, functionality did. Aqueous solubility ranged from 9.24% to 40.74%, native pH between 5.50 and 8.15, and water holding capacities between 2.52 g/g and 5.19 g/g. In addition, the oil holding capacity was also the lowest for the batch with the lowest water holding capacity with 1.33 g/g and the highest for the one with the highest water holding capacity with 2.21 g/g. A classification of solubility of commercial pea protein isolates was proposed with classes low (<10%), medium (similar to 20-25%) and high (>35%). Predictions regarding colloidal stability were possible due to the analysis of surface charge over a pH range of around 2.5 to 8, including the determination of the isoelectric points of the individual pea protein products. Here, differences were found between pH 3.43 and 4.76. An SDS-PAGE analysis was used to fractionate the main protein components and to determine the constituents in comparison with a standard marker. Taken together, this study showed that different pea protein isolates exhibited different physico-chemical properties, and that a selection for food product development based on the parameters such as solubility, zeta potential behavior, native pH, and water/oil holding capacity is advisable.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PROTEIN FLOCCULATION REACTIONS - A PHYSICO-CHEMICAL APPROACH
    SAIFER, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1952, 13 (06): : 730 - 743
  • [42] Physico-chemical characterization of some lead oxides
    Berdan, I
    Calu, N
    Berdan, CI
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 1996, 47 (09): : 841 - 846
  • [43] Physico-Chemical Characterization of Lignocellulosic Seed Microfibers
    Pandey, Ritu
    Dubey, Amarish
    Prasad, G. Krishna
    Arputharaj, A.
    Raja, A. S. M.
    Dubey, Ragini
    Sinha, Mukesh Kumar
    Jose, Seiko
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [44] Physico-chemical characterization of thermally treated bentonite
    Zivica, Vladimir
    Palou, Martin T.
    COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2015, 68 : 436 - 445
  • [45] Photoacoustic characterization of bone physico-chemical information
    Xie, Weiya
    Feng, Ting
    Yu, Dong
    Ta, Dean
    Cheng, Liming
    Cheng, Qian
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2022, 13 (05) : 2668 - 2681
  • [46] Physico-chemical characterization of proteins by capillary electrophoresis
    Rabiller-Baudry, M
    Bouguen, A
    Lucas, D
    Chaufer, B
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B, 1998, 706 (01): : 23 - 32
  • [47] Physico-chemical Characterization of Novel Compound RmBr
    Higley, Courtney
    Sarkar, Arindam Basu
    Reddy, E. Shyam P.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2018, 32 (01):
  • [48] Physico-chemical properties of surfactant and protein films
    Patino, Juan M. Rodriguez
    Rodriguez Nino, Ma. Rosario
    Sanchez, Cecilio Carrera
    CURRENT OPINION IN COLLOID & INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2007, 12 (4-5) : 187 - 195
  • [49] New hydrofluoropolyethers II: Physico-chemical characterization
    Tonelli, Claudio
    Di Meo, Antonella
    Picozzi, Rosaldo
    Bassi, Mattia
    JOURNAL OF FLUORINE CHEMISTRY, 2011, 132 (05) : 356 - 362