External Versus Internal Focus of Attention in Procedural Skills Learning: A Randomized Study

被引:0
|
作者
Tarasova, Natalia [1 ]
Wilkins, Parvathi [1 ]
Cook, David A. [2 ,3 ]
Pankratz, V. Shane [4 ]
Morrey, Mark M. [5 ,6 ]
Laack, Torrey A. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Coll Med & Sci, Multidisciplinary Simulat Ctr, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Coll Med & Sci, Med & Med Educ, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Gen Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Univ New Mexico, Hlth Sci Ctr, Albuquerque, NM USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Coll Med & Sci, Orthoped, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Div Adult Reconstruct, Rochester, MN USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Coll Med & Sci, Emergency Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Dept Emergency Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000005776
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
PurposeThe Optimizing Performance Through Intrinsic Motivation and Attention for Learning (OPTIMAL) theory postulates that directing attention to the intended movement effect or outcome (external focus) is more effective than directing attention to the internal body motion or body part (internal focus). This study compared external versus internal focus of attention as novice students learned ultrasound-guided peripheral cannulation. The authors hypothesized that conditions promoting an external (vs internal) focus of attention would result in better performance on immediate and delayed (retention) testing. MethodThe authors conducted a randomized, experimental study from October 2022 to February 2023 comparing external and internal focus using ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation followed by practice using an ultrasound training block. Undergraduate health science students performed 4 practice trials with instructions to focus on the needle tip (external focus) or their hands (internal focus), followed by immediate and delayed (retention) assessment 2 weeks later. The primary outcome was time to successful cannulation. Results were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and parametric survival analysis regression (accelerated failure time) models. ResultsSeventy participants completed the immediate assessment. The external focus group completed successful cannulation a mean of 2.33 times faster (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-3.67; P < .001) than those in the internal focus group (median time, 12.0 vs 29.5 seconds). Results also favored the external focus group during practice, with the external focus group successfully completing the task a mean of 1.83 times faster (95% CI, 1.04-3.21; P = .04) than the internal focus group. In the retention assessment, the external focus group successfully completed the task a mean of 2.37 times faster (95% CI, 1.19-4.74; P = .02) than the internal focus group. ConclusionsExternal focus of attention compared with internal focus of attention improves medical motor skill learning in novice learners.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 324
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] External focus of attention delivers superior punches with the preferred hand but not with the non-preferred: A comparison of internal, external and holistic focus of attention
    Sanjani, Faezeh Mohammadi
    Van Der Kamp, John
    Bahram, Abbas
    Savelsbergh, Geert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 55 (05) : 483 - 502
  • [32] The Effects of External and Internal Focus of Attention on Learning a Static Balance Skill in Children with Mild Mental Retardation
    Dana, Amir
    Moradi, Jalil
    Salehian, Mir Hamid
    Matin, Parastoo Shayan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS-MASHHAD, 2022, 10 (02): : 15474 - 15481
  • [33] Motor learning and movement automatization in typically developing children: The role of instructions with an external or internal focus of attention
    Krajenbrink, Hilde
    van Abswoude, Femke
    Vermeulen, Sanne
    van Cappellen, Sandra
    Steenbergen, Bert
    HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 60 : 183 - 190
  • [34] An external relative to an internal focus of attention enhances motor learning in children with poor motor imagery ability
    Abdollahipour, R.
    Bahmani, M.
    Babak, M.
    Land, W.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2019, 34 : S673 - S673
  • [35] Internal focus of attention is superior to external focus when training is extended to several weeks
    Black, C
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 26 : S35 - S35
  • [36] IS AN EXTERNAL FOCUS OF ATTENTION MORE BENEFICIAL THAN AN INTERNAL FOCUS TO BALL CATCHING IN CHILDREN?
    Abdollahipour, Reza
    Psotta, Rudolf
    KINESIOLOGY, 2017, 49 (02) : 235 - 241
  • [37] The influence of external and internal foci of attention on transfer to novel situations and skills
    Totsika, V
    Wulf, G
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2003, 74 (02) : 220 - 225
  • [38] Mastery versus invention learning: impacts on future learning of simulated procedural skills
    Ryan Brydges
    Andrea Fiume
    Lawrence Grierson
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2022, 27 : 441 - 456
  • [39] Examining the Mechanisms of Internal and External Focus of Attention With Donders' Subtractive Method
    Blinch, Jarrod
    Harry, John R.
    Hart, Melanie A.
    Cousineau, Denis
    MOTOR CONTROL, 2022, 26 (03) : 378 - 395
  • [40] The Effect of an External and Internal Focus of Attention on Dual-Task Performance
    Sherwood, David E.
    Lohse, Keith R.
    Healy, Alice F.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2020, 46 (01) : 91 - 104