Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Adadioglu, Oeznur [1 ]
Acar, Bilgehan Atilgan [2 ]
Acar, Tuerkan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Internal Med Nursing Dept, Sakarya, Turkiye
[2] Sakarya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Sakarya, Turkiye
来源
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR | 2024年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
acute stroke; health-care professionals; reliability; validity; INSTRUMENTS; VALIDATION; SCALES;
D O I
10.1002/brb3.70191
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe current research was carried out to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire (ASMaQ), developed to determine the acute stroke management awareness of health-care professionals.MethodsThis methodological study was performed in a training and research hospital. Data were collected using the "Participant Interview Form" and the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire.ResultsThe Content Validity Index (CVI) of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire was found to be 0.91. As a result of exploratory factor analysis (EFA), it was revealed that the scale, which was adapted to Turkish, consisted of 3-factor and 29 items, as in its original form. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the 3-factor structure of the scale. The ASMaQ exhibited strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.96) and test-retest reliability (0.879).ConclusionThe 29-item and three-dimensional structure of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire was revealed to be a valid and reliable measurement tool that could be utilized in evaluating the acute stroke management awareness of health-care professionals in the Turkish language and culture.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire for the Spondyloarthropathies
    Esra Ozcan
    Ozlem Yilmaz
    Ahmet Tutoglu
    Hatice Bodur
    Rheumatology International, 2012, 32 : 1563 - 1568
  • [32] Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire
    Gunaydin, Gurkan
    Gunaydin, Ozge Ece
    Yakut, Hatice
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 32 (03) : 466 - 470
  • [33] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish version of the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire
    Karatepe, Hasan Turan
    Yavuz, Fatih Kaasim
    Turkcan, Ahmet
    KLINIK PSIKOFARMAKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 23 (03): : 231 - 241
  • [34] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire
    Erol, Erkan
    Yildiz, Ayse
    Yildiz, Ramazan
    Apaydin, Umut
    Gokmen, Derya
    Elbasan, Bulent
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (09) : E549 - E554
  • [35] The Turkish Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity Assessment
    Mamuk, Rojjin
    Sahin, Nevin
    Dissiz, Melike
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF BAKIRKOY, 2019, 15 (03) : 265 - 271
  • [36] Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version
    Akyel, Betul
    Aldemir, Ebru
    Ender Altintoprak, Ayse
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2018, 29 (03) : 202 - 208
  • [37] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Adult Picky Eating Questionnaire
    Ayyildiz, Feride
    Esin, Kubra
    PROGRESS IN NUTRITION, 2022, 24 (03):
  • [38] RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE EXERCISE THERAPY BURDEN QUESTIONNAIRE
    Sari, F.
    Sari, S.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2023, 82 : 2126 - 2126
  • [39] INTERNATIONAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION
    Saglam, Melda
    Arikan, Hulya
    Savci, Sema
    Inal-Ince, Deniz
    Bosnak-Guclu, Meral
    Karabulut, Erdem
    Tokgozoglu, Lale
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2010, 111 (01) : 278 - 284
  • [40] Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire
    Altin, Busra
    Aksoy, Songul
    ERCIYES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 44 (03) : 286 - 292