Translation Shifts in English Indonesian: A Cognitive-Affective Map Study

被引:0
|
作者
Bessie, Polce Aryanto [1 ]
Artawa, Ketut [1 ]
Pastika, I. wayan [1 ]
Udayana, I. nyoman [1 ]
机构
[1] Udayana Univ, Fac Humanities, Linguist Doctoral Study Program, Badung, Indonesia
关键词
CAM; Shift; Semantic Arguments; Actant; COLLOCATIONS;
D O I
10.17576/3L-2024-3003-15
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
Semantic cognition should be considered first when translating. The cognitive process relates to how people determine the component semantics of words in either written or oral text. Simply put, the cognitive process brings semantic labels to one's mind, which correspond to syntactic labels of a different language discourse. Translators' efforts to match the meaning of source language (SL) text in the target language (TL) can lead to translation shifts. Therefore, this article focuses on the valence shift between English and Indonesian. The primary source of this article was Start With Why by Sinek (2009) and its Indonesian translation by Purwoko (2019). The analysis applied the Cognitive Affective Map tool. This article explores the translation shift by considering the semantic map by Song (2018) and the blended theory by Ungerer and Schmid (2006). The results of this research indicate that an intrasystem shift occurs. Ergative cases in source language change to nonergative cases, and the entity of semantic argument changes animate cases to be unanimated, or vice versa. In addition, the number of semantic arguments changes. This research implies that translators should define semantic arguments when translating and clarify them with target language speakers' social cognition to find equivalent meanings.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 228
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR - THE COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE MISMATCH HYPOTHESIS
    MILLAR, MG
    TESSER, A
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1990, 17 : 86 - 90
  • [32] A Cognitive-Affective Scale for Hurricane Risk Perception
    Trumbo, Craig W.
    Peek, Lori
    Meyer, Michelle A.
    Marlatt, Holly L.
    Gruntfest, Eve
    McNoldy, Brian D.
    Schubert, Wayne H.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2016, 36 (12) : 2233 - 2246
  • [33] COGNITIVE CONTROLS AND AGGRESSION IN CHILDREN - THE CONCEPT OF COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE BALANCE
    SANTOSTEFANO, S
    RIEDER, C
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 52 (01) : 46 - 56
  • [34] THE FORMATION OF AFFECTIVE JUDGMENTS - THE COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE MODEL VERSUS THE INDEPENDENCE HYPOTHESIS
    ANAND, P
    HOLBROOK, MB
    STEPHENS, D
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (03) : 386 - 391
  • [35] English legalese translation into Indonesian
    Dewi, Haru Deliana
    Wijaya, Andika
    Hidayat, Rahayu S.
    WACANA-JURNAL ILMU PENGETAHUAN BUDAYA-JOURNAL OF THE HUMANITIES OF INDONESIA, 2020, 21 (03): : 446 - 474
  • [36] COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE INTERACTION - A TEST OF THE SPECIFICITY AND GENERALITY HYPOTHESES
    CLARK, DA
    COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1986, 10 (06) : 607 - 623
  • [37] Cognitive-affective mechanisms and processes in autobiographical memory - Commentary
    Conway, MA
    MEMORY, 2003, 11 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [38] Visceral sensory and cognitive-affective neuroscience: towards integration?
    Van Oudenhove, Lukas
    GUT, 2010, 59 (04) : 431 - 432
  • [39] The cognitive-affective neuroscience of obsessive-compulsive disorder
    Stein D.J.
    Goodman W.K.
    Rauch S.L.
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2000, 2 (4) : 341 - 346
  • [40] A systematic review of multisensory cognitive-affective integration in schizophrenia
    Tseng, Huai-Hsuan
    Bossong, Matthijs G.
    Modinos, Gemma
    Chen, Kuan-Ming
    McGuire, Philip
    Allen, Paul
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2015, 55 : 444 - 452