Cost-Utility of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes in Spain

被引:0
|
作者
Merino-Torres, Juan Francisco [1 ]
Ilham, Sabrina [2 ]
Alshannaq, Hamza [2 ,3 ]
Pollock, Richard F. [4 ]
Ahmed, Waqas [4 ]
Norman, Gregory [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Univ Hosp La Fe, Hlth Res Inst Fe, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept,Dept Med, Valencia, Spain
[2] Dexcom, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Covalence Res Ltd, Harpenden AL5 2JD, England
来源
关键词
continuous glucose monitoring; CGM; cost-effectiveness; hypoglycaemia; health economics; type; 2; diabetes; LIFETIME HEALTH OUTCOMES; MELLITUS; MODEL; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; FREQUENCY; CHILDREN; TRENDS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.2147/CEOR.S483459
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Management of advanced type 2 diabetes (T2D) typically involves daily insulin therapy alongside frequent blood glucose monitoring, as treatments such as oral antidiabetic agents are therapeutically insufficient. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has been shown to facilitate greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and improvements in patient satisfaction relative to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). This study aimed to investigate the cost-utility of rt-CGM versus SMBG in Spanish patients with insulin-treated T2D.. Methods: The analysis was conducted using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (CDM V9.5). Baseline characteristics of the simulated patient cohort and treatment efficacy data were sourced from a large-scale, United States-based retrospective cohort study. Costs were obtained from Spanish sources and inflated to 2022 Euros (EUR) where required. A remaining lifetime horizon (maximum 50 years) was used, alongside an annual discount rate of 3% for future costs and health effects. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of EUR 30,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was adopted, based on precedent across previous cost-effectiveness studies set in Spain. A Spanish payer perspective was adopted. Results: Over patient lifetimes, rt-CGM yielded 9.933 QALYs, versus 8.997 QALYs with SMBG, corresponding to a 0.937 QALY gain with rt-CGM. Total costs in the rt-CGM arm were EUR 2347 higher with rt-CGM versus SMBG (EUR 125,365 versus EUR 123,017). The base case incremental cost-utility ratio was therefore EUR 2506 per QALY gained, substantially lower than the WTP threshold of EUR 30,000 per QALY. The analysis also projected a reduction in cumulative incidence of ophthalmic, renal, neurological, and cardiovascular events in rt-CGM users, with reductions of 16.03%, 13.07%, 7.34%, and 9.09%, respectively. Conclusion: Compared to SMBG, rt-CGM is highly likely to be a cost-effective intervention for patients living with insulin-treated T2D in Spain.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] THE EFFECTS OF STRUCTURED SELF-MONITORING OF BLOOD GLUCOSE IN INSULIN-TREATED TYPE 2 DIABETES
    Wu, Y. C.
    Yang, Y. -S.
    Chen, Y. -J.
    Huang, C. -N.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 106 : S86 - S87
  • [12] Long-term cost-effectiveness of real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin in the United Kingdom
    Isitt, J. J. I.
    Roze, S. R.
    Leelarathna, L. L.
    Cogswell, G. C.
    Normann, G. N.
    Lynch, P. L.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2022, 39
  • [13] Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Kim, Kyung-Soo
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2018, 42 (01) : 26 - 27
  • [14] Cost-effectiveness analysis of real-time continuous monitoring glucose compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose for diabetes mellitus in Spain
    Garcia-Lorenzo, Borja
    Rivero-Santana, Amado
    Vallejo-Torres, Laura
    Castilla-Rodriguez, Ivan
    Garcia-Perez, Sonia
    Garcia-Perez, Lidia
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (04) : 772 - 781
  • [15] Equivalent Efficacy of Intensive Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose to Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes
    Takano, Yuya
    Namiki, Yulia
    Hiiragi, Hiroko
    Yamada, Taku
    Sasaki, Hiroto
    Murohashi, Yuko
    Takamine, Hikaru
    Inazumi, Koji
    Terauchi, Yasuo
    Osada, Uru N.
    DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [16] Self-monitoring of blood glucose in insulin-treated diabetes: a multicase study
    Cameron, Dawn
    Harris, Fiona
    Evans, Josie M. M.
    BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2018, 6 (01)
  • [17] Individuals with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Benefit from Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring
    Tanton, Damon
    DIABETES, 2014, 63 : A597 - A597
  • [18] Cost-Effectiveness of a Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System vs. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 2 Diabetes Patients on Insulin in Canada
    Isitt, John J.
    Roze, Stephane
    Cogswell, Gregory
    Lynch, Peter M.
    DIABETES, 2022, 71
  • [19] Cost-Effectiveness of Real-Time CGM vs. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes from a US Payor Perspective
    Alshannaq, Hamza
    Norman, Gregory J.
    Lynch, Peter M.
    DIABETES, 2024, 73
  • [20] COST EFFECTIVENESS OF REAL-TIME CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING COMPARED WITH SELF-MONITORING OF BLOOD GLUCOSE FOR TYPE 1 DIABETES PATIENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
    Minshall, M.
    Rentoul, D.
    Graham, C.
    Isitt, J.
    Klinkenbijl, B.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 21 : A91 - A92