Privacy and Fairness Analysis in the Post-Processed Differential Privacy Framework

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Kai [1 ]
Gao, Longxiang [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Jinjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Comp Technol, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
[2] Qilu Univ Technol, Shandong Comp Sci Ctr, Key Lab Comp Power Network & Informat Secur, Minist Educ,Shandong Acad Sci, Jinan 250316, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Fundamental Res Ctr Comp Sci, Shandong Prov Key Lab Comp Power Internet & Serv C, Jinan 250000, Peoples R China
关键词
Privacy; Accuracy; Differential privacy; Noise; Resource management; Vectors; Three-dimensional displays; Standards; Sensitivity; Optimization methods; consistency; non-negativity; post-processing; fairness; census data privacy; COUNTS;
D O I
10.1109/TIFS.2025.3528222
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The post-processed Differential Privacy (DP) framework has been routinely adopted to preserve privacy while maintaining important invariant characteristics of datasets in data-release applications such as census data. Typical invariant characteristics include non-negative counts and total population. Subspace DP has been proposed to preserve total population while guaranteeing DP for sub-populations. Non-negativity post-processing has been identified to inherently incur fairness issues. In this work, we study privacy and unfairness (i.e., accuracy disparity) concerns in the post-processed DP framework. On one hand, we propose the post-processed DP framework with both non-negativity and accurate total population as constraints would inadvertently violate privacy guarantee desired by it. Instead, we propose the post-processed subspace DP framework to accurately define privacy guarantees against adversaries. On the other hand, we identify unfairness level is dependent on privacy budget, count sizes as well as their imbalance level via empirical analysis. Particularly concerning is severe unfairness in the setting of strict privacy budgets. We further trace unfairness back to uniform privacy budget setting over different population subgroups. To address this, we propose a varying privacy budget setting method and develop optimization approaches using ternary search and golden ratio search to identify optimal privacy budget ranges that minimize unfairness while maintaining privacy guarantees. Our extensive theoretical and empirical analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of our approaches in addressing severe unfairness issues across different privacy settings and several canonical privacy mechanisms. Using datasets of Australian Census data, Adult dataset, and delinquent children by county and household head education level, we validate both our privacy analysis framework and fairness optimization methods, showing significant reduction in accuracy disparities while maintaining strong privacy guarantees.
引用
收藏
页码:2412 / 2423
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Effective Federated Recommendation Framework with Differential Privacy
    Xu, Zihang
    Chu, Chiawei
    Song, Shiyang
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [22] Optimizing differential privacy in a federated learning framework: strategies for dynamic clipping and privacy allocation
    Liang, Zhaoxian
    Chen, Yonghong
    ENGINEERING RESEARCH EXPRESS, 2025, 7 (01):
  • [23] Privacy, Liveliness and Fairness for Reputation
    Schiffner, Stefan
    Clauss, Sebastian
    Steinbrecher, Sandra
    SOFSEM 2011: THEORY AND PRACTICE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2011, 6543 : 506 - 519
  • [24] From Privacy to Algorithms' Fairness
    Sabelli, Chiara
    Tallacchini, Mariachiara
    PRIVACY AND IDENTITY MANAGEMENT: THE SMART REVOLUTION, 2018, 526 : 86 - 110
  • [25] On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairness
    Chang, Hongyan
    Shokri, Reza
    2021 IEEE EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (EUROS&P 2021), 2021, : 292 - 303
  • [26] A Variational Approach to Privacy and Fairness
    Rodriguez-Galvez, Borja
    Thobaben, Ragnar
    Skoglund, Mikael
    2021 IEEE INFORMATION THEORY WORKSHOP (ITW), 2021,
  • [27] Privacy in Crises: The NIST Privacy Framework
    Hiller, Janine S.
    Russell, Roberta S.
    JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 25 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [28] A privacy threat analysis framework: supporting the elicitation and fulfillment of privacy requirements
    Deng, Mina
    Wuyts, Kim
    Scandariato, Riccardo
    Preneel, Bart
    Joosen, Wouter
    REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING, 2011, 16 (01) : 3 - 32
  • [29] A privacy threat analysis framework: supporting the elicitation and fulfillment of privacy requirements
    Mina Deng
    Kim Wuyts
    Riccardo Scandariato
    Bart Preneel
    Wouter Joosen
    Requirements Engineering, 2011, 16 : 3 - 32
  • [30] Limiting Privacy Breaches in Differential Privacy
    Ouyang Jia
    Yin Jian
    Liu Shao-Peng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SERVICE SYSTEM (CSSS), 2014, 109 : 657 - 664