Meta-Analysis Comparing Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Disease

被引:1
|
作者
Almizel, Abdulrahman M. [1 ]
Levett, Jeremy Y. [2 ]
Zolotarova, Tetiana [3 ]
Eisenberg, Mark J. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Div Cardiac Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
关键词
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; OUTCOMES; VESSEL; IMPACT; TRIAL; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) frequently present with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and the optimal timing of complete revascularization (CR) in these cases remains uncertain. This study aims to assess major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and procedural complications in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD who underwent immediate (index procedure) versus staged CR. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing immediate to staged CR in STEMI and multivessel CAD. Trials were identified by way of a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Libraries from database inception to March 6, 2024. The data were analyzed using the RevMan software. A total of 5 randomized controlled trials (n = 1,415) were included in our study, which showed no significant differences in MACEs (13.3% vs 9.8%, relative risk [RR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 1.83), all-cause mortality (3% vs 4.55%, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.21), or myocardial infarction (4.5% vs 2.6%, RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.55) at a weighted mean follow-up duration of 16 months. However, the staged group had a higher rate of unplanned revascularization (8.6% vs 4.4%, RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.04). In conclusion, in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD, at a mean follow-up of approximately 1.3 years, there is no significant difference in immediate versus staged revascularization (SR) for MACEs; however, SR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. SR within the index hospitalization may be as effective as immediate CR; further trials are needed to confirm this. We conducted a meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials comparing immediate to staged complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel coronary artery disease. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction rates between immediate and staged complete revascularization. However, staged revascularization was associated with a higher incidence of unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 81
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IMMEDIATE VERSUS STAGED COMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION IN HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE PATIENTS WITH MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Gonzalez, Maria E. Benitez
    Roberson, Manuel Villegas
    Ferreira, Andre Luiz Carvalho
    Lima, Ana Emanuela
    Neves, Henrique Alexsander
    Guida, Camila Mota
    Baddi, Ajay
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 1083 - 1083
  • [22] Immediate Versus Staged Revascularization of Non-Culprit Coronary Arteries During ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sayat, G. M.
    Barnes, M. V.
    Dalangin, F. P.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (04) : S3 - S4
  • [23] Complete Revascularization in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
    Kober, Lars
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (13): : 1282 - 1284
  • [24] Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve guided complete revascularization versus infarct related artery only revascularization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease
    Neupane, Saroj
    Singh, Hemindermeet
    Edla, Sushruth
    Altujjar, Mohammad
    Yamsaki, Hiroshi
    Lalonde, Thomas
    Rosman, Howard S.
    Eggebrecht, Holger
    Mehta, Rajendra H.
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2019, 30 (06) : 393 - 397
  • [25] Meta-Analysis of Complete versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease
    Levett, Jeremy Y.
    Windle, Sarah B.
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Cabaussel, Josselin
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 40 - 49
  • [26] Immediate versus staged complete myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: A post hoc analysis of the randomized FLOWER-MI trial
    Tea, Victoria
    Morelle, Jean-Francois
    Gallet, Romain
    Cayla, Guillaume
    Lemesle, Gilles
    Lhermusier, Thibault
    Dillinger, Jean-Guillaume
    Ducrocq, Gregory
    Angouvant, Denis
    Cottin, Yves
    Chamandi, Chekrallah
    le Bras, Alicia
    Steg, Philippe Gabriel
    Montalescot, Gilles
    Nelson, Anais Charles
    Simon, Tabassome
    Chatellier, Gilles
    Danchin, Nicolas
    Puymirat, Etienne
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2022, 115 (10) : 496 - 504
  • [27] Clinical impact of simultaneous complete revascularization vs culprit only primary angioplasty in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis
    Navarese, E.
    De Luca, G.
    Serra, A.
    Buffon, A.
    Margheri, M.
    De Servi, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 767 - 767
  • [28] Staged Versus One-time Complete Revascularization With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients Without ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Hannan, Edward L.
    Samadashvili, Zaza
    Walford, Gary
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Stamato, Nicholas J.
    Venditti, Ferdinand J.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Sharma, Samin
    King, Spencer B., III
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [29] Impact of complete revascularization on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: an updated meta-analysis
    Sanz-Sanchez, Jorge
    Chiarito, Mauro
    Regazzoli, Damiano
    Cannata, Francesco
    Condorelli, Gianluigi
    Reimers, Bernhard
    Stefanini, Giulio G.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (12) : 988 - 990
  • [30] Immediate versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Uncomplicated by Cardiogenic Shock
    Mihnea-Traian, Nichita-Brendea
    Popa, Virgil
    Polojintef-Corbu, Dorina-Carmen
    Popescu, Mircca Ioachim
    INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (03) : 94 - 100