Effect of protected bike lanes on bike-sharing ridership: A New York City case study

被引:0
|
作者
Chahine, Ricardo [1 ]
Duarte, Jorge [2 ]
Gkritza, Konstantina [3 ]
机构
[1] HNTB Corp, 111 Monument Cir, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, 110 Sproul Hall 5800, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil & Construct Engn & Agr & Biol Engn, 550 Stadium Mall Dr, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Shared mobility; Bike-sharing; Difference-in-differences; Protected bike lane; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104147
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Bike-sharing is an emerging transportation service that has been found to offer a sustainable and convenient option for transportation, especially in urban areas. It also complements transportation for public services such as buses, trains, or subways. Nevertheless, bike-sharing adoption remains low in comparison to car usage, potentially due to cyclists' concerns about their safety on the road. In this regard, this research aims to investigate the impact of the implementation of protected bike lanes on bike-sharing ridership, given that such measures have been found to improve cyclists' road safety perceptions. The study uses ridership data from 2014 to 2019, obtained from the Citi Bike System Data in New York City. A difference-in-differences analysis with multiple time periods and groups was conducted to understand the impact of introducing multiple protected bike lanes in the city. The analysis provided evidence of a significant uptick in ridership after the installation of protected bike lanes, with the most pronounced increases observed in areas directly served by these new lanes. The study did not find apparent trends related to bike lane placement or seasonal variations in introduction dates. Our findings provide specific insights that enhance bike lane placement strategies and improve coordination between operators and stakeholders in this regard.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EMPIRICAL STUDY ON INTENTION TO USE BIKE-SHARING IN VIETNAM
    Nguyen Thi Ngan
    Bui Huy Khoi
    IIOAB JOURNAL, 2019, 10 : 1 - 6
  • [32] The Bike-Sharing System as an Element of Enhancing Sustainable Mobility-A Case Study based on a City in Poland
    Macioszek, Elzbieta
    Swierk, Paulina
    Kurek, Agata
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [33] Visualization of the Mobility Patterns in the Bike-Sharing Transport Systems in Mexico City
    Moncayo-Martinez, L. A.
    Ramirez-Nafarrate, A.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2016, : 1851 - 1855
  • [34] Examining usage patterns of a bike-sharing scheme in a medium sized city
    Caulfield, Brian
    O'Mahony, Margaret
    Brazil, William
    Weldon, Peter
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 100 : 152 - 161
  • [35] Optimization Model for the Supply Volume of Bike-Sharing: Case Study in Nanjing, China
    Yu, Jiajie
    Ji, Yanjie
    Yi, Chenyu
    Kuai, Chenchen
    Samal, Dmitry Ivanovich
    INFORMATION, 2021, 12 (05)
  • [36] Strategic and Operational Planning of Bike-Sharing Systems by Data Mining - A Case Study
    Vogel, Patrick
    Mattfeld, Dirk C.
    COMPUTATIONAL LOGISTICS, 2011, 6971 : 127 - 141
  • [37] Understanding the intention to use bike-sharing system: A case study in Xi'an, China
    Zhang, Xiaonan
    Wang, Jianjun
    Long, Xueqin
    Li, Weijia
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [38] Bike-sharing systems' impact on modal shift: A case study in Delft, the Netherlands
    Ma, Xinwei
    Yuan, Yufei
    Van Oort, Niels
    Hoogendoorn, Serge
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 259
  • [39] The Impact of Dockless Bike-Sharing on Public Transit: A Case Study of Shanghai, China
    Yun, Meiping
    Wei, Shuang
    Ma, Yue
    CICTP 2021: ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, ENHANCED CONNECTION, 2021, : 955 - 965
  • [40] A simulation-optimization study of the inventory of a bike-sharing system: The case of Mexico City Ecobici's system
    Marquez, Hector R. Gomez
    Bracho, Rafael Lopez
    Ramirez-Nafarrate, Adrian
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2021, 9 (03) : 1059 - 1072