Co-Evolution of Law and Economics-Judicial Sovereignty

被引:0
|
作者
Paschall, Stephen [1 ]
Atkinson, Glen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Law Sch, Law, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Reno, NV USA
关键词
judicial sovereignty; abundance; banker capitalism; transactions; increasing returns; B52; K00; K11; K20; P14; P16;
D O I
10.1080/00213624.2024.2418261
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
John R. Commons' Legal Foundations of Capitalism documented the co-evolution of law and economics. Commons reviewed legal cases that affected economic development. Courts had endorsed emerging business practices unleashing endogenous forces of change. Scarcity was the dominant feature of the pre-industrial economy, but Commons' Stages of Capitalism demonstrated that the economy had evolved to industrial production. As industrialism became more dominant, production was potentially abundant. However, abundance was a source of instability. Stabilized scarcity policies relieving instability were confirmed by the judiciary. Judicial review established judicial sovereignty that Commons called "dictatorship of the courts." Intangible property was legalized. Use value of property was replaced by exchange value. Edicts of the courts could supplant the work of the legislative and executive branches risking a movement toward the fascism of pre-war Italy. The economy continues to evolve. The cutting edge of the economy is knowledge-based production, which is not manufacturing commodities. It is about the design and use of technology for the application of ideas that are built on increasing returns and positive feedback (further sources of instability). Competition is different in these industries where market power is prominent. This will require policies to deal with market power.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1141
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Law and Economics Perspective on Judicial Risk Regulation
    Van Zeben, Josephine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2018, 9 (01) : 79 - 98
  • [22] Co-evolution and emergence in design
    Poon, J
    Maher, ML
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ENGINEERING, 1997, 11 (03): : 319 - 327
  • [23] Co-evolution in social interactions
    Sato, H
    Namatame, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 1109 - 1114
  • [24] Evaluation and Diversity in Co-evolution
    van Wijngaarden, Rients P. T.
    de Jong, Edwin D.
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE - PPSN X, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5199 : 631 - 640
  • [25] Symbiosis and co-evolution in animats
    Numaoka, C
    ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 1995, 929 : 261 - 272
  • [26] Co-evolution in negotiation games
    Murakami, Y
    Sato, H
    Namatame, A
    ICCIMA 2001: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 241 - 245
  • [27] Climbing the co-evolution ladder
    Lenton, TM
    Schellnhuber, HJ
    Szathmáry, E
    NATURE, 2004, 431 (7011) : 913 - 913
  • [28] The Co-Evolution of Matter and Consciousness
    Velmans, Max
    SYNTHESIS PHILOSOPHICA, 2007, 22 (02) : 273 - 282
  • [29] The co-evolution of life and Earth
    Dietrich, Lars E. P.
    Tice, Michael M.
    Newman, Dianne K.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (11) : R395 - R400
  • [30] Cytonuclear integration and co-evolution
    Daniel B. Sloan
    Jessica M. Warren
    Alissa M. Williams
    Zhiqiang Wu
    Salah E. Abdel-Ghany
    Adam J. Chicco
    Justin C. Havird
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2018, 19 : 635 - 648