Efficacy of Turmeric-Boswellia Formulation for Acute Low Back Pain: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Kare, Sanjeev Kumar [1 ]
Gupta, Ajay [2 ]
Rudrappa, Girish H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Govt Med Coll & Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Nirmal Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Sapthagiri Inst Med Sci & Res Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Bengaluru 560090, Karnataka, India
关键词
Low back pain; pain intensity; turmeric; Boswellia; Rhuleave-K; pain relief; PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS; CURCUMIN; IMPACT; OIL;
D O I
10.1177/09731296241281438
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the efficiency of the turmeric-Boswellia formulation (TBF, Rhuleave-K) in reducing acute low back pain (LBP) among healthy subjects. Materials and Methods This research aimed to assess the effectiveness of TBF compared to a placebo through a single dose of 1,000 mg, administered in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 76 participants experiencing acute low back pain. Efficacy was evaluated using objective outcome measures, namely the numerical rating scale (NRS), categorical pain relief scale (PRS), the onset of analgesia, and the short-form McGill questionnaire. NRS and PRS measurements were taken 30 minutes post-dose at rest, during movement, and under pressure application at the afflicted area. The onset of analgesia was assessed 6 hours post-dose. Quantitative analysis of the Sum of Pain intensity Difference (SPID) and Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) values was conducted based on the NRS and PRS scores, respectively. Results Pain relief began quickly and all participants in the TBF group reported a significantly noticeable reduction in pain at about 76.4 minutes, compared to the 190 minutes in the placebo group. Similarly, 92.7% of participants in the TBF group experienced mean meaningful pain relief (MPR) as early as 224.1 minutes, compared to the zero MPR responders in the placebo group. There was a statistically significant difference in the time to pain relief between the TBF and placebo groups, with significant improvement in the TBF group (log-rank hazard ratio, p < 0.001). None of the individuals in the placebo group demonstrated a minimum of 50% maximum TOTPAR in rest, movement, and pressure. Whereas, 75.71% of the TBF group experienced at least 50% maximum TOTPAR in rest, 88.09% in movement, and 90.48% in pressure. The effectiveness of the treatment, as measured by the number needed to treat (NNT) for achieving at least 50% of MPR in the TBF group, was 1.2 at rest and 1.1 during both movement and pressure. Conclusion Oral administration of TBF (Rhuleave-K) to individuals with acute low back pain significantly reduces pain, providing meaningful relief within 4 hours of administration. This highlights the substantial analgesic effectiveness of TBF in the context of acute LBP.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of sibutramine
    Bray, GA
    Ryan, DH
    Gordon, D
    Heidingsfelder, S
    Cerise, F
    Wilson, K
    OBESITY RESEARCH, 1996, 4 (03): : 263 - 270
  • [32] Intraoperative acupuncture for posttonsillectomy pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Tsao, Gabriel J.
    Messner, Anna H.
    Seybold, Jeannie
    Sayyid, Zahra N.
    Cheng, Alan G.
    Golianu, Brenda
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (08): : 1972 - 1978
  • [33] Efficacy of turmeric (curcumin) in pain and postoperative fatigue after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled study
    Agarwal, Krishna Adit
    Tripathi, C. D.
    Agarwal, Brij B.
    Saluja, Satish
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (12): : 3805 - 3810
  • [34] Efficacy of turmeric (curcumin) in pain and postoperative fatigue after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled study
    Krishna Adit Agarwal
    C. D. Tripathi
    Brij B. Agarwal
    Satish Saluja
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 3805 - 3810
  • [35] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a glycine antagonist in neuropathic pain
    Wallace, MS
    Rowbotham, MC
    Katz, NP
    Dworkin, RH
    Dotson, RM
    Galer, BS
    Rauck, RL
    Backonja, MM
    Quessy, SN
    Meisner, PD
    NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (11) : 1694 - 1700
  • [36] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ormeloxifene in breast pain and nodularity
    Kumar, Sandeep
    Rai, Ruchi
    Agarwal, G. G.
    Dwivedi, Varsha
    Kumar, Surender
    Das, Vinita
    NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 2013, 26 (02): : 69 - 74
  • [37] Topiramate in treatment of patients with chronic low back pain - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Muehlbacher, Moritz
    Nickel, Marius K.
    Kettler, Christian
    Tritt, Karin
    Lahmann, Claas
    Leiberich, Peter K.
    Nickel, Cerstin
    Krawczyk, Jakub
    Mitterlehner, Ferdinand O.
    Rother, Wolfhardt K.
    Loew, Thomas H.
    Kaplan, Patrick
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 22 (06): : 526 - 531
  • [38] Efficacy of Enalapril in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Sonbolestan, Seyed Ali
    Heshmat, Kiyan
    Javanmard, Shaghayegh Haghjooy
    Saadatnia, Mohammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 4 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [39] The efficacy of azithromycin in pityriasis rosea: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Pandhi, Deepika
    Singal, Archana
    Verma, Prashant
    Sharma, Reena
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2014, 80 (01): : 36 - 40
  • [40] Vaccine for cocaine dependence: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled efficacy trial
    Kosten, Thomas R.
    Domingo, Coreen B.
    Shorter, Daryl
    Orson, Frank
    Green, Charles
    Somoza, Eugene
    Sekerka, Rachelle
    Levin, Frances R.
    Mariani, John J.
    Stitzer, Maxine
    Tompkins, D. Andrew
    Rotrosen, John
    Thakkar, Vatsal
    Smoak, Benjamin
    Kampman, Kyle
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2014, 140 : 42 - 47