An Adaptive Probabilistic Imaging Location Method for Microseismic Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Zeng, Zhiyi [1 ,2 ]
Han, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Wei [2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Yong [4 ]
Zhang, Jianzhong [5 ]
Chang, Ying [6 ]
Zhang, Da [6 ]
Dai, Rui [6 ]
Ji, Hu [6 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geol, State Key Lab Earthquake Dynam, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Geophys High Resolut Imagin, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Earth & Space Sci, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, South China Sea Inst Oceanol, Key Lab Ocean & Marginal Sea Geol, Guangzhou 510301, Peoples R China
[5] Ocean Univ China, Coll Marine Geosci, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[6] BGRIMM Technol Grp, Inst Min Engn, Beijing 102628, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2025年 / 63卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Equal differential time (EDT); large picking error; microseismic monitoring; probabilistic location imaging; probability density function (pdf); seismic event location; EARTHQUAKE LOCATION; EVENT LOCATION; TIME; SEISMICITY; STATION; BENCHMARKING; ALGORITHM; INVERSION; MIGRATION; STACKING;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2025.3529931
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Microseismic event locations provide critical insights into fracture locations and stress conditions within rock formations, which are essential for seismic hazard monitoring. In practice, pick-based location methods are widely utilized due to their high computational efficiency. However, the accuracy of picking is compromised when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is low. Source location utilizing equal differential time (EDT) surfaces between station pairs represents an effective strategy for mitigating picking errors. Typically, EDT surfaces are constructed using either a fixed width or a fixed probability density function (pdf), which presents challenges in simultaneously achieving high resolution and accuracy. To address this issue, we propose an adaptive probabilistic imaging location method that constructs EDT surfaces by incorporating an adaptive pdf linked to the SNR of arrival picking data. The location probability imaging function is defined as the product of the independent EDT surfaces used for locating sources. For high-SNR data, where picking errors are typically small, the adaptive pdf converges more rapidly than the Gaussian distribution, yielding higher resolution by assigning lower probabilities to locations distant from true positions. For low-SNR data, where picking errors are typically large, the adaptive pdf exhibits heavy-tailed characteristics with a slower rate of decrease, enhancing the accuracy by assigning higher probabilities to likely true locations. The effectiveness and stability of the method are validated through theoretical analyses and synthetic data tests. Application to mine microseismic data indicates that the proposed method improves the accuracy and resolution of microseismic event locations relative to other methods.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Imaging discrete fracture networks using the location and moment tensors of microseismic events
    Yu, Jeongmin
    Byun, Joongmoo
    Seol, Soon Jee
    EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 52 (01) : 42 - 53
  • [42] Weak signal extraction method for surface microseismic monitoring data
    Song, W., 1600, Science Press, 16 Donghuangchenggen North Street, Beijing, 100717, China (52):
  • [43] Relative source location using a local equivalent path strategy for surface microseismic monitoring
    Jiang, Yongyong
    Wang, Runqiu
    Chen, Xiaoqing
    Chu, Fangdong
    Yin, Chen
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 216 (02) : 1233 - 1244
  • [44] Detection, location, and source mechanism determination with large noise variations in surface microseismic monitoring
    Alexandrov D.
    Eisner L.
    Waheed U.B.
    Kaka S.I.
    Greenhalgh S.A.
    Alexandrov, Dmitry (dmitry.alexandrov@seimik.cz), 1600, Society of Exploration Geophysicists (85): : KS197 - KS206
  • [45] Detection, location, and source mechanism determination with large noise variations in surface microseismic monitoring
    Alexandrov, Dmitry
    Eisner, Leo
    bin Waheed, Umair
    Kaka, SanLinn I.
    Greenhalgh, Stewart Alan
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (06) : KS197 - KS206
  • [46] Microseismic monitoring - Introduction
    Grechka, Vladimir
    Artman, Brad
    Eisner, Leo
    Heigl, Werner
    Wilson, Stephen
    GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 80 (06) : WCI - WCII
  • [47] Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing in Coal Seam using Ground Microseismic Monitoring and Source Location
    Yanan Qian
    Quangui Li
    Yunpei Liang
    Qianting Hu
    Wenxi Li
    Jie Li
    Changjun Yu
    Ronghui Liu
    Shuyue Peng
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2024, 57 : 679 - 694
  • [48] Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing in Coal Seam using Ground Microseismic Monitoring and Source Location
    Qian, Yanan
    Li, Quangui
    Liang, Yunpei
    Hu, Qianting
    Li, Wenxi
    Li, Jie
    Yu, Changjun
    Liu, Ronghui
    Peng, Shuyue
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2024, 57 (01) : 679 - 694
  • [49] Focal mechanism determination by location-constrained deep learning: Application to microseismic monitoring
    Tian, Xiao
    Chen, Yichong
    Zhang, Xiong
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Xiangteng
    GEOPHYSICS, 2025, 90 (02) : L31 - L42
  • [50] Optimizing microseismic monitoring: a fusion of Gaussian-Cauchy and adaptive weight strategies
    Zhu, Wei
    Li, Zhihui
    Su, Hang
    Liu, Lei
    Heidari, Ali Asghar
    Chen, Huiling
    Liang, Guoxi
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 11 (05)