Manual Chest PRESSURE During Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation

被引:1
|
作者
Ferreira, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mikhail, Philopatir [4 ]
Lim, Joyce [1 ]
Ray, Max [1 ]
Dwivedi, Jovita [1 ]
Brienesse, Stephen [1 ]
Butel-Simoes, Lloyd [1 ]
Meere, William [4 ]
Bland, Adam [4 ]
Howden, Niklas [4 ]
Malaty, Michael [1 ]
Kunda, Mercy [1 ]
Kelty, Amy [4 ]
McGee, Michael [5 ]
Boyle, Andrew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sverdlov, Aaron L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
William, Maged [4 ]
Attia, John [3 ]
Jackson, Nicholas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Morris, Gwilym
Barlow, Malcolm [1 ]
Leitch, James [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Collins, Nicholas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ford, Tom [4 ]
Wilsmore, Bradley [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] John Hunter Hosp, Cardiovasc Dept, Lookout Rd,New Lambton Hts, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Hunter Med Res Inst, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[4] Gosford Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Gosford, NSW, Australia
[5] Tamworth Rural Referral Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Tamworth, NSW, Australia
关键词
atrial fibrillation; cardioversion; chest pressure; DEFIBRILLATION; IMPEDANCE; FORCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Direct current cardioversion is frequently used to return patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Chest pressure during cardioversion may improve the efficacy of cardioversion through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront chest pressure during direct current cardioversion for AF with anterior-posterior pad positioning. METHODS This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from 2021 to 2023. Follow-up was until hospital discharge. Recruitment occurred across 3 centers in New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria were age >= 18 years, referred for cardioversion for AF, and anticoagulation for 3 weeks or transesophageal echocardiography excluding left atrial appendage thrombus. Exclusion criteria were other arrhythmias requiring cardioversion, such as atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. The intervention arm received chest pressure during cardioversion from the first shock. The primary efficacy outcome was total joules required per patient encounter. Secondary efficacy outcomes included first shock success, transthoracic impedance, cardioversion success, and sinus rhythm at 30 minutes post cardioversion. RESULTS A total of 311 patients were randomized, 153 to control and 158 to intervention. There was no difference in total joules applied per encounter in the control arm vs intervention arm (355.0 +/- 301 J vs 413.8 +/- 347 J; P = 0.19). There was no difference in first shock success, total shocks provided, average impedance, and cardioversion success. CONCLUSIONS This study does not support the routine application of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (PRESSURE-AF [Investigating the Efficacy of Chest Pressure for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation.
引用
收藏
页码:2207 / 2213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Marked QTc Reduction Immediately Following Direct Current Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation
    Omondi, Arthur
    Sirinvaravong, Natee
    Spears, Jenna
    Sauerwein, Samuel
    Taoutel, Roy
    Liskov, Steven
    Gao, Chuanyu
    Liu, Tong
    Kowey, Peter R.
    Yan, Gan-Xin
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 9 (04) : 543 - 554
  • [22] Left atrial size after Cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: Effect of external direct current shock
    Mattioli, AV
    Bonatti, S
    Bonetti, L
    Mattioli, G
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2003, 16 (03) : 271 - 276
  • [23] Anticoagulation during cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: Current clinical practice
    Stellbrink C.
    Schimpf T.
    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2005, 5 (3) : 155 - 162
  • [24] Left atrial emptying fraction determined during atrial fibrillation predicts maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
    Walek, Pawel
    Gorczyca, Iwona
    Sielski, Janusz
    Wozakowska-Kaplon, Beata
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [25] Efficacy and Safety of Dual Direct Current Cardioversion versus Single Direct Current Cardioversion as an Initial Treatment Strategy in Obese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Aymond, Joshua
    Sanchez, Alexandra
    Castine, Michael
    Bernard, Michael
    Khatib, Sammy
    Hiltbold, Aimee
    Polin, Glenn
    Rogers, Paul
    Dominic, Paari
    Morin, Daniel P.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148 (25) : E288 - E289
  • [26] Right and left atrial activation during external direct-current cardioversion shocks delivered for termination of atrial fibrillation in humans
    Prakash, A
    Saksena, S
    Krol, RB
    Philip, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 87 (09): : 1080 - 1088
  • [27] Biomarkers of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Patients with Paroxysmal or Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Following External Direct Current Electrical Cardioversion
    Demirel, Ozan
    Berezin, Alexander E.
    Mirna, Moritz
    Boxhammer, Elke
    Gharibeh, Sarah X.
    Hoppe, Uta C.
    Lichtenauer, Michael
    BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [28] Pressure-assisted cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter
    De Bruyn, VH
    Park, TH
    Botteron, GW
    Faddis, MN
    Baker, BM
    Guerrero, PA
    Lindsay, BD
    Gleva, MJ
    Smith, JM
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 102 - 102
  • [29] Feasibility and safety of the direct current cardioversion at the time of left atrial appendage occlusion for patients with atrial fibrillation
    Meng, Xian Sai
    Chen, Tao
    Wang, Xin Yan
    Lu, Xu
    Hu, Jia
    Shen, Juan
    Guo, Jun
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [30] Early direct current cardioversion or ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter and acute decompensated heart failure
    Foo, Fang Shawn
    Kerr, Andrew
    Gabriel, Ruvin
    Heaven, David
    Looi, Jen-Li
    Lund, Mayanna
    Voss, Jamie
    Sutton, Timothy
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 132 (1496) : 39 - 46