Manual Chest PRESSURE During Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation

被引:1
|
作者
Ferreira, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mikhail, Philopatir [4 ]
Lim, Joyce [1 ]
Ray, Max [1 ]
Dwivedi, Jovita [1 ]
Brienesse, Stephen [1 ]
Butel-Simoes, Lloyd [1 ]
Meere, William [4 ]
Bland, Adam [4 ]
Howden, Niklas [4 ]
Malaty, Michael [1 ]
Kunda, Mercy [1 ]
Kelty, Amy [4 ]
McGee, Michael [5 ]
Boyle, Andrew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sverdlov, Aaron L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
William, Maged [4 ]
Attia, John [3 ]
Jackson, Nicholas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Morris, Gwilym
Barlow, Malcolm [1 ]
Leitch, James [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Collins, Nicholas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ford, Tom [4 ]
Wilsmore, Bradley [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] John Hunter Hosp, Cardiovasc Dept, Lookout Rd,New Lambton Hts, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Hunter Med Res Inst, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[4] Gosford Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Gosford, NSW, Australia
[5] Tamworth Rural Referral Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Tamworth, NSW, Australia
关键词
atrial fibrillation; cardioversion; chest pressure; DEFIBRILLATION; IMPEDANCE; FORCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Direct current cardioversion is frequently used to return patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Chest pressure during cardioversion may improve the efficacy of cardioversion through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront chest pressure during direct current cardioversion for AF with anterior-posterior pad positioning. METHODS This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from 2021 to 2023. Follow-up was until hospital discharge. Recruitment occurred across 3 centers in New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria were age >= 18 years, referred for cardioversion for AF, and anticoagulation for 3 weeks or transesophageal echocardiography excluding left atrial appendage thrombus. Exclusion criteria were other arrhythmias requiring cardioversion, such as atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. The intervention arm received chest pressure during cardioversion from the first shock. The primary efficacy outcome was total joules required per patient encounter. Secondary efficacy outcomes included first shock success, transthoracic impedance, cardioversion success, and sinus rhythm at 30 minutes post cardioversion. RESULTS A total of 311 patients were randomized, 153 to control and 158 to intervention. There was no difference in total joules applied per encounter in the control arm vs intervention arm (355.0 +/- 301 J vs 413.8 +/- 347 J; P = 0.19). There was no difference in first shock success, total shocks provided, average impedance, and cardioversion success. CONCLUSIONS This study does not support the routine application of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (PRESSURE-AF [Investigating the Efficacy of Chest Pressure for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation.
引用
收藏
页码:2207 / 2213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of manual pressure on transthoracic impedance during cardioversion for atrial fibrillation
    Dixit, S
    Hsia, H
    Marchlinski, FE
    Kocovic, DZ
    Pavri, BB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) : 96A - 96A
  • [2] Synchronized direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation after blunt chest trauma
    Ellis, DY
    Hutchinson, NP
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2000, 49 (02): : 342 - 344
  • [3] Investigating the efficacy of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation: a randomised control trial protocol (Pressure-AF)
    Ferreira, David
    Mikhail, Philo
    McGee, Michael
    Boyle, Andrew
    Sverdlov, Aaron
    William, Maged
    Jackson, Nicholas
    Barlow, Malcolm
    Leitch, James
    Collins, Nicholas
    Ford, Thomas
    Wilsmore, Bradley
    OPEN HEART, 2021, 8 (02):
  • [4] Manual chest compression facilitates low energy cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Sivakumaran, S.
    Tsuyuki, R. T.
    Repka, L.
    Krahn, A.
    Jones, A.
    Skanes, A.
    Kubac, G.
    Gula, L.
    Paradon, K.
    Yee, R.
    Klein, G.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 23 : 277C - 277C
  • [5] Effectiveness of dual external direct current cardioversion for initial cardioversion in atrial fibrillation
    Gardner, Michael W.
    Yadava, Mrinal
    Raitt, Merritt H.
    Elman, Miriam R.
    Zarraga, Ignatius G.
    MacMurdy, Karen S.
    Dalouk, Khidir A.
    Jessel, Peter M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (09) : 1636 - 1643
  • [6] Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation
    Benamer S.
    Lusty D.
    Everington T.
    Cardiology and Therapy, 2016, 5 (2) : 215 - 221
  • [7] Activation of inflammation after direct current cardioversion atrial fibrillation
    Gajek, J
    Zysko, D
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 392 - 392
  • [8] Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation
    Femia, Giuseppe
    Fetahovic, Taufik
    Shetty, Pratap
    Lee, Astin
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2018, 27 (07): : 798 - 803
  • [9] Direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation - The next 40 years
    Manning, WJ
    Zimetbaum, PJ
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 77 (09) : 895 - 896
  • [10] DIRECT-CURRENT CARDIOVERSION OF ESTABLISHED ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
    LEVY, S
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 15 (06) : 445 - 449